Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a problem with this, and I'm not seeing anyone trying to explain why they believe these schools, who filled out the application and were granted the money under the conditions specified, should not have been allowed to do so. It cost a lot above normal operating costs to stay open under the conditions the CDC and local HHS required.
I see some who are mad that their public schools didn't use the money to stay open, but why does that mean private schools should not have been allowed to do so? It's great that some schools didn't need the money (some schools, like Holton, are seriously flush with cash), but others did need it to stay open and keep kids safely in school, which is what everybody wanted, right?
I do find the $5 mil to Sidwell puzzling and would be interesting in an accounting of that. It is the largest amount given to any school I could find.
It is terrible that public school in this area didn't use the funds to try to stay open. Many, many other public schools in other areas did. That doesn't make it "disgusting" that private schools made a different and better choice.
NP: just wanted to note, that staying open was not a requirement to have a PPP forgiven. We had to keep employees on and pay our bills, but there was no requirement about continuing to offer services or mode of services. I think the PPP program is flawed, but I don't fault institutions who applied and took the funds offered.
Of course you don't have a problem with this. You're an admin of a school that took the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.
Oh yes it is. These schools have huge endowments and did not need to to take the money. I applaud those that didn't and am ashamed for those that did. And on top of taking the loans they asked parents for their annual fund donations. What a crock.
Anonymous wrote:Here comes the cover up! Nothing to see here but we will have to raise tuition you know because of all the costs associated with Covid. Loan? What loan?
So admin and board members writing in why did some schools decide not to take this money? Seems like they realize it was wrong? In fact a Holton announced that was the reason. So……
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.
Oh yes it is. These schools have huge endowments and did not need to to take the money. I applaud those that didn't and am ashamed for those that did. And on top of taking the loans they asked parents for their annual fund donations. What a crock.
GDS didn’t take PPP funds because the leadership and trustees believed that the funds could be better spent to advance social justice.
Anonymous wrote:Here comes the cover up! Nothing to see here but we will have to raise tuition you know because of all the costs associated with Covid. Loan? What loan?
So admin and board members writing in why did some schools decide not to take this money? Seems like they realize it was wrong? In fact a Holton announced that was the reason. So……
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.
Oh yes it is. These schools have huge endowments and did not need to to take the money. I applaud those that didn't and am ashamed for those that did. And on top of taking the loans they asked parents for their annual fund donations. What a crock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.
Oh yes it is. These schools have huge endowments and did not need to to take the money. I applaud those that didn't and am ashamed for those that did. And on top of taking the loans they asked parents for their annual fund donations. What a crock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.
Oh yes it is. These schools have huge endowments and did not need to to take the money. I applaud those that didn't and am ashamed for those that did. And on top of taking the loans they asked parents for their annual fund donations. What a crock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Burgundy Farm took $2.4 million??!? Shocked.
I am so curious how Burgundy spent this huge amount of money, besides the hand washing stations they added…
Well according to the school officals who are on this thread it went to hvac you know and some signs and the other 1.5 hmmmm not to the teachers who did the heavy lifting😳
Anonymous wrote:My kids school got a huge amount, but I can well imagine what they did with it. They upgraded HVAC, invested in a lot of classroom technology for remote learning, rented tents for outdoor classrooms, and did weekly PCR testing of the entire school population. I really don’t think they lined their pockets, I think they used it for pandemic related expenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a problem with this, and I'm not seeing anyone trying to explain why they believe these schools, who filled out the application and were granted the money under the conditions specified, should not have been allowed to do so. It cost a lot above normal operating costs to stay open under the conditions the CDC and local HHS required.
I see some who are mad that their public schools didn't use the money to stay open, but why does that mean private schools should not have been allowed to do so? It's great that some schools didn't need the money (some schools, like Holton, are seriously flush with cash), but others did need it to stay open and keep kids safely in school, which is what everybody wanted, right?
I do find the $5 mil to Sidwell puzzling and would be interesting in an accounting of that. It is the largest amount given to any school I could find.
It is terrible that public school in this area didn't use the funds to try to stay open. Many, many other public schools in other areas did. That doesn't make it "disgusting" that private schools made a different and better choice.
NP: just wanted to note, that staying open was not a requirement to have a PPP forgiven. We had to keep employees on and pay our bills, but there was no requirement about continuing to offer services or mode of services. I think the PPP program is flawed, but I don't fault institutions who applied and took the funds offered.
Of course you don't have a problem with this. You're an admin of a school that took the money.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is not the PPP loans for private schools. That makes sense. The problem was the PPP loans for charter schools. That made zero sense and seems like outright fraud.