Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had you already paid for the food since you were getting take-out? Did you include a tip? Maybe the server saw you didn’t tip for the take out food so she decided to be difficult. Were you then going to start eating your food with the margarita?
Went to bar to pick up to-go food and asked her to add two classic margaritas to the order while we wait. When she declined to give me one, we just tipped her a few bucks. Should have stiffed her but we didn’t.
Who TF cares if they were “classic” margaritas or not? You sound very off, OP.
I'm sorry it triggered you. I wanted to emphasize we were ordering an adult cocktail, so as to not be confused with say a colorful huge slush margarita, which is maybe something an underage kid would order.
Well, yeah I sincerely doubt they thought you were undergrads regardless of your drink order. Lots of establishments require that employees ID even when people look well over the legal age to drink. They would rather be safe than sorry and lose their license. This can’t be new information. You are are being ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:No way they should serve you and risk losing their liquor license. Next time put your ID in your bra or give it to your husband.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
Anonymous wrote:It's weird because of your age, but I wouldn't be ticked off because if there's an inspector in the restaurant that night, the server could lose their job. I've seen it happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
This. I am amazed at the combination of ignorance and righteousness of the most PP. The law is about serving minors, not carding.
+1
Folks are piling on and using disinformation to do so because this forum is full of bitter hoi polloi who like to see a presumably UMC Karen get knocked down a notch.
Or:
This forum is filled with people who don’t condone nonsense. The server was 100% correct. Why should she jeopardize her job because some entitled person demands a margarita?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
This. I am amazed at the combination of ignorance and righteousness of the most PP. The law is about serving minors, not carding.
+1
Folks are piling on and using disinformation to do so because this forum is full of bitter hoi polloi who like to see a presumably UMC Karen get knocked down a notch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
This. I am amazed at the combination of ignorance and righteousness of the most PP. The law is about serving minors, not carding.
+1
Folks are piling on and using disinformation to do so because this forum is full of bitter hoi polloi who like to see a presumably UMC Karen get knocked down a notch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
This. I am amazed at the combination of ignorance and righteousness of the most PP. The law is about serving minors, not carding.
+1
Folks are piling on and using disinformation to do so because this forum is full of bitter hoi polloi who like to see a presumably UMC Karen get knocked down a notch.
Anonymous wrote:All the "it's the LAW" people here are too much. Let me guess, none of you ever drive over the speed limit either, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on stare or local law, but generally the law forbids serving minors, and carding is a business policy to make sure you don't violate that law. If they didn't card a 40 year old, and ABC were standing right there, they would not have been in trouble because they did not serve a minor.
This. I am amazed at the combination of ignorance and righteousness of the most PP. The law is about serving minors, not carding.
+1