Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is absolutely no reason anyone should ever go to Dickenson. Ever.
https://thedickinsonian.com/opinion/2019/02/07/should-white-boys-still-be-allowed-to-talk/
TBH, this is very well written. Impressive, even if I disagree with the argument.
I was also impressed. My takeaway wasn't that the author thought white guys should shut up, but that they should prioritize listening when the issue is something they have little firsthand experience with. Nice piece!
Would you be equally "impressed" with a piece that says "Should black girls still be allowed to talk?"
Do you believe that black girls should "prioritize listening?"
Anonymous wrote:Bowdoin
Anonymous wrote:Any engineering school will be challenging. Even more so if the school has a strict curve. My undergrad (which I won't name here) curved to a 2.6/4.0 GPA. There were no minus grades, so the scale was:
A= 4.0
B+ = 3.5
B = 3.0
C+ = 2.5, etc.
This put the school average GPA close to a C+ average. As were hard earned. Bs, Cs and Ds were common. We had an expression "D equals diploma" and it was true for many.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is absolutely no reason anyone should ever go to Dickenson. Ever.
https://thedickinsonian.com/opinion/2019/02/07/should-white-boys-still-be-allowed-to-talk/
TBH, this is very well written. Impressive, even if I disagree with the argument.
It's disgusting. Anyone who has graduated from Dickenson should hang their heads in shame.
Anonymous wrote:NYU, at least in arts and sciences
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech engineering. DD didn't go. She looked like an potential engineer as a HS senior (720 math sat, AP Physics C, Calc BC). She (we) asked a lot of questions of VT: why they flunk out so many students (who obviously were top of their class, to get into engineering at VT in the first place) Asked if there would be a way to start out, intentionally, on a course schedule that planned on 5 years to graduate in engineering (since so many student inadvertently ended up needing 5 years anyway) Their attitude, their response to questions was so harsh, bullying really. It seemed like such a fallacy that they wanted to encourage students in stem/engineering. Harsh environment for a woman especially. imo
Anonymous wrote:There may be something to the rigorous vs non rigorous hs theory. I didn’t find my college classes crazy hard, but I also went to a tough HS and took a challenging workload.
I think major also plays a role.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know of schools that are hard, just for the sake of being hard?
My friend told me that her DD left Dickinson for that reason. Her DD was not learning and not being supported. The impression was that the school is trying to improve its reputation by being tough??
Heard the same about Rice many years ago.
I think Johns Hopkins has a reputation for behing very hard.
A lot of state schools with loose admissions standards set by state law are very tough on freshmen.
Amherst has grade deflation for a top school. (It gets the most favorable adjustment of GPA by Yale Law School, where the adjustment is based on a combination of the quality of the school and the grading scale.)
Anonymous wrote:CMU for everything but business