Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars are meant to be leased even in today’s much changed leasing market with money factor snd residual. Costs of repair after 3 years can be daunting with the myriad electronic systems/sensors, adjustable suspensions, and the like.
I thought leasing was an unwise financial decision?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars are meant to be leased even in today’s much changed leasing market with money factor snd residual. Costs of repair after 3 years can be daunting with the myriad electronic systems/sensors, adjustable suspensions, and the like.
I thought leasing was an unwise financial decision?
Cars lose their value the minute you drive them off the lot. I think that the notion that leasing is an unwise financial decision is rooted in the 1950s way of thinking about cars--that you buy one for the investment of owning a car for the life of the car. Cars a disposable these days. Drive it for a few years and then turn it in for a new one. Otherwise, the money you think you're saving on a lease will be spent on mechanical repairs and other things you'll need to do to maintain the upkeep of the car. Personally, I'd rather have a new model every few years.
Anonymous wrote:Lexus isn’t luxury. It’s basic.
The Mercedes gle 450 is really nice, especially with the AMG package.
I’ve had range rovers for years. As long as you lease, they take care of any problems. I would not buy one.
I’ve also been liking the look of the new genesis suv. The tiger woods one. It’s pretty hot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexus isn’t luxury. It’s basic.
The Mercedes gle 450 is really nice, especially with the AMG package.
I’ve had range rovers for years. As long as you lease, they take care of any problems. I would not buy one.
I’ve also been liking the look of the new genesis suv. The tiger woods one. It’s pretty hot.
Such an odd post, knocking on Lexus but praising Range Rovers and Hyundais...
Lexus is good option, though not sure what OP is really looking for.
Not Hyundai. Genesis. Looks like a Bentley, but better.
It’s still a Hyundai, dude.![]()
Just like a Lexus is still a Toyota?![]()
Sure. If Toyota had a car named Toyota Lexus and decided to rebrand it 6 years ago and only sold them at Toyota dealers until this year.
All vehicles sold internationally under the Lexus marque were sold domestically in Japan as a Toyota before 2005. Many Toyota and Lexus models share platforms, drivetrains snd innumerable parts. Some models are assembled on adjacent lines in the same factories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars are meant to be leased even in today’s much changed leasing market with money factor snd residual. Costs of repair after 3 years can be daunting with the myriad electronic systems/sensors, adjustable suspensions, and the like.
I thought leasing was an unwise financial decision?
Cars lose their value the minute you drive them off the lot. I think that the notion that leasing is an unwise financial decision is rooted in the 1950s way of thinking about cars--that you buy one for the investment of owning a car for the life of the car. Cars a disposable these days. Drive it for a few years and then turn it in for a new one. Otherwise, the money you think you're saving on a lease will be spent on mechanical repairs and other things you'll need to do to maintain the upkeep of the car. Personally, I'd rather have a new model every few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexus isn’t luxury. It’s basic.
The Mercedes gle 450 is really nice, especially with the AMG package.
I’ve had range rovers for years. As long as you lease, they take care of any problems. I would not buy one.
I’ve also been liking the look of the new genesis suv. The tiger woods one. It’s pretty hot.
Such an odd post, knocking on Lexus but praising Range Rovers and Hyundais...
Lexus is good option, though not sure what OP is really looking for.
Not Hyundai. Genesis. Looks like a Bentley, but better.
It’s still a Hyundai, dude.![]()
Just like a Lexus is still a Toyota?![]()
Sure. If Toyota had a car named Toyota Lexus and decided to rebrand it 6 years ago and only sold them at Toyota dealers until this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexus isn’t luxury. It’s basic.
The Mercedes gle 450 is really nice, especially with the AMG package.
I’ve had range rovers for years. As long as you lease, they take care of any problems. I would not buy one.
I’ve also been liking the look of the new genesis suv. The tiger woods one. It’s pretty hot.
Such an odd post, knocking on Lexus but praising Range Rovers and Hyundais...
Lexus is good option, though not sure what OP is really looking for.
Not Hyundai. Genesis. Looks like a Bentley, but better.
It’s still a Hyundai, dude.![]()
Just like a Lexus is still a Toyota?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexus isn’t luxury. It’s basic.
The Mercedes gle 450 is really nice, especially with the AMG package.
I’ve had range rovers for years. As long as you lease, they take care of any problems. I would not buy one.
I’ve also been liking the look of the new genesis suv. The tiger woods one. It’s pretty hot.
Such an odd post, knocking on Lexus but praising Range Rovers and Hyundais...
Lexus is good option, though not sure what OP is really looking for.
Not Hyundai. Genesis. Looks like a Bentley, but better.
It’s still a Hyundai, dude.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars are meant to be leased even in today’s much changed leasing market with money factor snd residual. Costs of repair after 3 years can be daunting with the myriad electronic systems/sensors, adjustable suspensions, and the like.
I thought leasing was an unwise financial decision?
Cars lose their value the minute you drive them off the lot. I think that the notion that leasing is an unwise financial decision is rooted in the 1950s way of thinking about cars--that you buy one for the investment of owning a car for the life of the car. Cars a disposable these days. Drive it for a few years and then turn it in for a new one. Otherwise, the money you think you're saving on a lease will be spent on mechanical repairs and other things you'll need to do to maintain the upkeep of the car. Personally, I'd rather have a new model every few years.
Yea this is the typical lease spiel. But really the only reason to lease is you want to continually drive a new car and don’t mind paying more to do so. Which is fine, but stop pedaling this lie that it somehow saves you money over keeping a car longer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars are meant to be leased even in today’s much changed leasing market with money factor snd residual. Costs of repair after 3 years can be daunting with the myriad electronic systems/sensors, adjustable suspensions, and the like.
I thought leasing was an unwise financial decision?
Cars lose their value the minute you drive them off the lot. I think that the notion that leasing is an unwise financial decision is rooted in the 1950s way of thinking about cars--that you buy one for the investment of owning a car for the life of the car. Cars a disposable these days. Drive it for a few years and then turn it in for a new one. Otherwise, the money you think you're saving on a lease will be spent on mechanical repairs and other things you'll need to do to maintain the upkeep of the car. Personally, I'd rather have a new model every few years.
Anonymous wrote:My husband drives a Mercedes (gls 430 or something? I’m not a car person.)
I like the car, but the service blows. Like we had a check engine light pop up and they said not to drive it and then told us they had an appointment in 10 days. And that check engine light is on more frequently than it should be (maybe 3-4 times in a 3 year old car?)
I’d never get one based on his experience, but I’m not sure what’s better. Lexus IS the most reliable, but i don’t like the way it looks and the rest are probably worse than the Mercedes.