Anonymous wrote:I was actually favorably impressed with the meeting. The DCPS team has a very well defined timeline in terms of what will happen every month, starting now. Everybody presenting seemed very competent.
But I am also an elementary school parent, so I am not worried about 2023. I understand middle school parents may feel anxious though..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should have tuned in to the briefing tonight or head over to the DCPS planning website. There are phase 1 improvements already underway including a cafeteria and classroom conversion and configuration for HS programming. The folks who are scared and trying to portray this as a rushed and thoughtless exercise are not paying attention.
I did tune in. Most of the discussion (at least from DCPS) was regarding parking and traffic. Getting to and from school takes an hour at most. The kids will be in school for 6 hours. The plans for curriculum, leadership, facilities (e.g. sports, labs etc.) are non-existent. They haven't even figured out whether it will be an AP or an IB school and what programs they plan to offer.
With a current 7th grader at Hardy, we have every right to be cautious (scared even, as you say). In a few years, the school might grow into a compelling alternative to Jackson/Reed but the first class will have it rough.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, i think the High School will open and the foxhall ES will be cancelled.
I don't understand why the city doesn't just double Stoddert? The neighborhood want that (then they could offer PK3). There is enough room on the site to so and there will be minimal traffic impact since nearly everyone walks. I think they should ban driving drop-offs for all non-disabled students.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, i think the High School will open and the foxhall ES will be cancelled.
I don't understand why the city doesn't just double Stoddert? The neighborhood want that (then they could offer PK3). There is enough room on the site to so and there will be minimal traffic impact since nearly everyone walks. I think they should ban driving drop-offs for all non-disabled students.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, i think the High School will open and the foxhall ES will be cancelled.
I don't understand why the city doesn't just double Stoddert? The neighborhood want that (then they could offer PK3). There is enough room on the site to so and there will be minimal traffic impact since nearly everyone walks. I think they should ban driving drop-offs for all non-disabled students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even with the money, I don't think there was ever a chance the MacArthur school would actually be ready by next year. Delaying the money might not delay actual opening much.
While these are tweets from Goulet, the decision was made by Mendelson. I don't know if Goulet had anything to do with it.
Goulet’s tweets say that the plan is not just delaying but shifting by putting Foxhall ES at the GDS site and looking for some new magical unicorn site for a HS.
Those tweets are confusing. There's clearly no actual "the plan" yet, so maybe that's what he thinks will result?
It's also confusing that Goulet is literally the only person reporting on these delays. Wasn't there a DCPS meeting about the new schools last night (or tonight)?
There is a meeting tonight. But Mendelson's legislative proposal does push the funds to FY24 and FY25 (on his website). It doesn't explicitly show up in the legislative text but perhaps that is an overview.
I'm going to guess most people who attend this meeting will not be aware of the delay, so that'll go over well.
Also, I'm curious as to where he thinks they're gonna find a spot for an entirely new high school in Ward 3.
I had heard friendship heights - like the old lord and Taylor building. Am I mistaken that is an option?
So would you blow up the J-R feeder system? Because the logical thing would be to split the feeders for J-R, and have Deal feed one high school and Hardy another. J-R is geographically within the boundaries of Deal, so what makes sense is have Deal feed J-R, and Hardy feed the new high school. That means the new school needs to be within the Hardy boundaries. So it's not really a search for a high school somewhere in Ward 2 or 3, it's a more focused search for a site somewhere within the existing Hardy boundaries.
Now the logical spot would be along the major transportation hub of the area, Wisconsin Ave. If rec centers can be considered, an obvious choice would be Jelleff. Oops, that's been leased to Maret for ten years. Or Guy Mason. Oops, that's leased to Georgetown.
Maybe there are other city-owned sites inside the Hardy boundaries that I'm missing. But the likelihood of the city assembling a large parcel via purchase or even eminent domain is remote.
How about Duke-Ellington, the former DCPS Western High School?
Anonymous wrote:You should have tuned in to the briefing tonight or head over to the DCPS planning website. There are phase 1 improvements already underway including a cafeteria and classroom conversion and configuration for HS programming. The folks who are scared and trying to portray this as a rushed and thoughtless exercise are not paying attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, listening to the DCPS info session. It seems that Goulet’s views are his own and not what seems well underway. MacArthur HS will open at the GDS site in 23. The budget delays that Goulet seems to be referring to are for additional improvements to the GDS site to bring it to full capacity.
Yeah, Goulet has egg on his face for over-reacting on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... the school will open in 2023 with zero improvements? Because?
No idea. I can't figure out the headlong rush. It is not like this is an election issue. The place has no high school level track or anything. There are no labs or any facilities.
Anonymous wrote:So... the school will open in 2023 with zero improvements? Because?