Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
You do realize that all schools have 200+ kids in Freshman classes and this starts thinning out as the classes progress, right? Or do you think all schools have a fixed quota of teachers and they just have to manage regardless of number of students?
Not my kid's CTCL.
What's a CTCL? Is that like a SLAC or NESCAC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
You do realize that all schools have 200+ kids in Freshman classes and this starts thinning out as the classes progress, right? Or do you think all schools have a fixed quota of teachers and they just have to manage regardless of number of students?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Yeah, but W&M is not also a world-class research university.
OP's daughter will be an undergraduate, not a professional researcher at this point.
+1
They are rated equally for undergraduate instruction. Go to Michigan which is a world class research university as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Yeah, but W&M is not also a world-class research university.
OP's daughter will be an undergraduate, not a professional researcher at this point.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Yeah, but W&M is not also a world-class research university.
OP's daughter will be an undergraduate, not a professional researcher at this point.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Considering U Michigan (OOS), W&M Monroe Scholars (OOS), Lafayette ($25,000/yr merit) and Northeastern ($20,00 merit/yr) for Poly Sci/Econ
If cost is not a factor, I'd say go with Michigan. Head and shoulders above the other 3 options.
OMG, this stuff never ends. A - U Mich is not head and shoulders above the other 3 options, and B - it's irrelevant -- these are not Ivies - your kid should go where they will be most lively to thrive!
It's no wonder why so many college kids are stressed, unhappy and ultimately transfer schools - they focus on the wrong things in their decision process!!! A happy and engaged kid will be more likely to excel in their academics, but more importantly will grow into the person who can excel in life!
Nationally, yes it is. It is a legit top 20 school with virtually every program in the top 10. Sure, if you want to be in the Mid-Atlantic then Lafayette or W&M are fine - both great schools. Michigan is a powerhouse and has the reputation and alumni network to back it up.
This. The PP you are responding to either has something against Michigan or does not know what she's talking about. I repeat, if cost is not a concern, go with Michigan. It IS head and shoulders above the other choices.
Everyone here is talking about W&M. While it's a great school, its nowhere close to Michigan on any standard. It's not even a top school in VA. A few SLAC (or is this one a LAC) afficionados seem to recommend Lafayette but.. c'mon. No one seems to like NEU.
OP. If you have the money, go the best school money can buy. In this case, it's Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
You do realize that all schools have 200+ kids in Freshman classes and this starts thinning out as the classes progress, right? Or do you think all schools have a fixed quota of teachers and they just have to manage regardless of number of students?
Not my kid's CTCL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
You do realize that all schools have 200+ kids in Freshman classes and this starts thinning out as the classes progress, right? Or do you think all schools have a fixed quota of teachers and they just have to manage regardless of number of students?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Considering U Michigan (OOS), W&M Monroe Scholars (OOS), Lafayette ($25,000/yr merit) and Northeastern ($20,00 merit/yr) for Poly Sci/Econ
If cost is not a factor, I'd say go with Michigan. Head and shoulders above the other 3 options.
OMG, this stuff never ends. A - U Mich is not head and shoulders above the other 3 options, and B - it's irrelevant -- these are not Ivies - your kid should go where they will be most lively to thrive!
It's no wonder why so many college kids are stressed, unhappy and ultimately transfer schools - they focus on the wrong things in their decision process!!! A happy and engaged kid will be more likely to excel in their academics, but more importantly will grow into the person who can excel in life!
Nationally, yes it is. It is a legit top 20 school with virtually every program in the top 10. Sure, if you want to be in the Mid-Atlantic then Lafayette or W&M are fine - both great schools. Michigan is a powerhouse and has the reputation and alumni network to back it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
There is no difference between an in person class with 200 students and online class with 1 million students. Might as well listen to a free online class from top schools like MIT
Every time I see one of these posts I think that person didn't go to a large university I went to University of Michigan and University of Maryland and this is simply not true.
Anybody who states that every class at Michigan has over 200 students is a moron. Stop posting and reposting nonsense!