Anonymous wrote:Have any of you even looked at her Instagram and watched her videos? She is the type of girl to think this was romantic. Just sayin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing funny or charming about this; this is psycho behavior.

It is absolutely gross, psycho behavior but the Republicans have arrived on this thread to gaslight the rest of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing funny or charming about this; this is psycho behavior.

It is absolutely gross, psycho behavior but the Republicans have arrived on this thread to gaslight the rest of us.

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing funny or charming about this; this is psycho behavior.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

A kid? Was she underage? I’m curious.

Yes, a kid. No, she was not underage. Who do you think she was most likely to call for car trouble? Her dad. Why? Because she's a broke and single New Jersey kid working in Midtown Manhattan. It's also very likely she was still living with her parents in NJ. In this context, she's a kid who was preyed on by a much older married man at work.

Preyed give me a break

You seriously don’t find this behavior predatory?

A few years ago the phrase “rape culture” rose to prominence and right wingers predictably understood it to mean whatever garbled definition was offered to them by people like Jesse Watters. Here is a great example of the kind of technique favored by gross men, a stop on a continuum of predatory behavior. No, the PP does not understand this to be predatory.

Honestly I think a lot of people would think drugging a woman’s drink with rohypnol is a fair tactic.

It's pretty disturbing to see the people here describing letting the air out of her tires as "hitting on her" and talking about her "agency" as if she consented to having the air let out of her tires without her knowledge.

+1. And if she turned down his ride, this psychopath would have left her alone in a dark Manhattan parking garage. Waiting for some creepy tow truck driver to come out, endangering her life and costing her several hundred dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on here called the girl a kid, how is he not in trouble for her being underage?

Adult women do not have any agency according to many here.

I love how you guys try to coopt arguments without understanding the terms.

This guy disabled her car and then offered her a ride. She had agency to say yes or no to a ride, certainly. But do you think she would have made the same decision if she had all the facts? If she knew he let the air out of her tires would she have seen the offer of a ride home as a kind move from a coworker, or the beginning of a movie about a serial killer?

She was not a kid. But she was his subordinate at work and his chosen target. And you deciding that you don't have to address illegal and predatory behavior because one poster used the word kid colloquially instead of clinically is a very obvious PR smokescreen.

Using kid when she is not shows that one has to trump it up to make it salacious because one has nothing on it.

Anonymous wrote:It's upsetting that women actually marry men who stalk them or otherwise manipulate things to get into a relationship with them. I hope she never decides that she's unhappy and wants to leave, because he'll kill her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's insane is not just that he did this... it's that years later, after being married to her, just had a kid (or two?) with her, and just secured a multi-million hosting gig of the 7PM prime time hour... he BRAGS ABOUT THIS ON TV! wtf

Way to re-victimize your ex wife and the children you have with her, you dirtbag.

This post is so weird. He was joking. He didn't do this. He was married when he started dating the producer/intern, whatever she was. It's not like she didn't know he had a wife and kids. She's not a victim.

The married Fox host was lusting after a kid in the office, so he decided to demobilize the kid's car so he could prey on her in the parking lot away from other colleagues. So charming, I am sure Fox lawyers, the News Corp board, and his ex wife loved hearing about this.

If you have to use kid as a name for a 20 something year old, then you are not secure in any info you’ve got.

A roughly 40 year old multi-millionaire married on-air talent creeping on a broke 20-something in the office makes her a kid in this context. He is a creepy old man who demobilized the kid's car. The old man's predatory behavior worked because she's a broke kid. A wealthy colleague his age would have had the money to order a black car and arrange a tow. Stop trying to spin for this sicko. Who not only preyed on the kid but just re-victimized hi ex wife and her family.

Stop infantilizing grown women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Letting the air out of someone's tires is PSYCHO. That would freak me the f*ck out. I would have got a restraining order, not gone on a date with him. The fact he was married would have been a non-starter w/ or w/out the tire situation.

What a creep.

She didn't know he did it. She thought he just happened to show up in her time of need and drove an hour out of his way to get her home.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Letting the air out of someone's tires is PSYCHO. That would freak me the f*ck out. I would have got a restraining order, not gone on a date with him. The fact he was married would have been a non-starter w/ or w/out the tire situation.

What a creep.

She didn't know he did it. She thought he just happened to show up in her time of need and drove an hour out of his way to get her home.

I would feel so violated and be so upset if I found out about this later. It would seriously tell me I was dealing with a psychopath and I'd wonder what else he was hiding...well an affair from his wife at the time!!