Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some Colgate supporters may bristle with this take, but its popularity has crested.
As far as Colgate's trajectory, I would encourage people to trust the data and not some fartknocker on a forum. Acceptance rate dropping by 50% every year. SAT and ACT midranges climbing. Doesn't sound like cresting to me.
Anonymous wrote:Eh, middling school at best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colgate's admission rate this year was about 17% - low, but not quite in Amherst/Williams/Midd territory despite huge increase in applications.
Part of what's driving the spike in numbers at many competitive schools is applications from non-score-reporting applicants who would not previously have applied. And some of these applicants are shotgunning 20, 30+ applications just to see what sticks. Which means, at many schools, accepted students will have more options and yield will trend down. So the decline in admission rates is not linear.
Nope. Admission rate was 12% for class of 2026.
Where are those numbers? The school reported 17% but has not send out its CDS yet.
Kickstart.
But the 12% number makes sense. Colgate received 21,000+ applications this year, which is a record fir them an up 21% over the year before, which was also a record. The number of applications this year was an astonishing 2.5 times greater (146%) than just 2 years ago.
Given that they received 21,000 applications, it isn’t hard to do the math that results in 12% because they are going to accept about the same number of students as they did the year before.
I thought the "astonishing" increase a couple of years ago coincided with their move to the common app.
Anonymous wrote:But Colgate says 17%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colgate's admission rate this year was about 17% - low, but not quite in Amherst/Williams/Midd territory despite huge increase in applications.
Part of what's driving the spike in numbers at many competitive schools is applications from non-score-reporting applicants who would not previously have applied. And some of these applicants are shotgunning 20, 30+ applications just to see what sticks. Which means, at many schools, accepted students will have more options and yield will trend down. So the decline in admission rates is not linear.
Nope. Admission rate was 12% for class of 2026.
Where are those numbers? The school reported 17% but has not send out its CDS yet.
Kickstart.
But the 12% number makes sense. Colgate received 21,000+ applications this year, which is a record fir them an up 21% over the year before, which was also a record. The number of applications this year was an astonishing 2.5 times greater (146%) than just 2 years ago.
Given that they received 21,000 applications, it isn’t hard to do the math that results in 12% because they are going to accept about the same number of students as they did the year before.
Anonymous wrote:But Colgate says 17%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colgate's admission rate this year was about 17% - low, but not quite in Amherst/Williams/Midd territory despite huge increase in applications.
Part of what's driving the spike in numbers at many competitive schools is applications from non-score-reporting applicants who would not previously have applied. And some of these applicants are shotgunning 20, 30+ applications just to see what sticks. Which means, at many schools, accepted students will have more options and yield will trend down. So the decline in admission rates is not linear.
Nope. Admission rate was 12% for class of 2026.
Where are those numbers? The school reported 17% but has not send out its CDS yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with all of the previous points about test scores and college admissions. Jettisoning the test requirement is going to be judged in the rear view mirror as a very stupid and costly mistake. It’s frankly ludicrous to suggest test scores are anything but the best way to judge kids’ academic abilities coming out of disparate high schools from around the country and the world. The pendulum will swing back to putting a big emphasis on standardized tests but the kids who were screwed this decade will pay the cost - both those who end up at schools where they cannot handle the work load and those whose work and ability should have placed them in more challenging college academic environs. Frankly it’s the former cohort that will pay the highest price and those kids are likely the ones who can least handle it
You wish, but just not true. My kid had a low SAT score and is thriving big time at a much higher ranked school than Colgate. Those tests are inane.
Your personal anecdote is meaningless. Rigorous scientific study has proven that standardized tests are the best predictor of college success. They are the only, just the best. What do you not understand?
There's nothing I don't understand. Except that you keep saying that but haven't provided any proof of such studies. Because the only ones there are those by people who stand to profit from sustaining the grift that is the College Board.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with all of the previous points about test scores and college admissions. Jettisoning the test requirement is going to be judged in the rear view mirror as a very stupid and costly mistake. It’s frankly ludicrous to suggest test scores are anything but the best way to judge kids’ academic abilities coming out of disparate high schools from around the country and the world. The pendulum will swing back to putting a big emphasis on standardized tests but the kids who were screwed this decade will pay the cost - both those who end up at schools where they cannot handle the work load and those whose work and ability should have placed them in more challenging college academic environs. Frankly it’s the former cohort that will pay the highest price and those kids are likely the ones who can least handle it
You wish, but just not true. My kid had a low SAT score and is thriving big time at a much higher ranked school than Colgate. Those tests are inane.
Your personal anecdote is meaningless. Rigorous scientific study has proven that standardized tests are the best predictor of college success. They are the only, just the best. What do you not understand?
There's nothing I don't understand. Except that you keep saying that but haven't provided any proof of such studies. Because the only ones there are those by people who stand to profit from sustaining the grift that is the College Board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colgate's admission rate this year was about 17% - low, but not quite in Amherst/Williams/Midd territory despite huge increase in applications.
Part of what's driving the spike in numbers at many competitive schools is applications from non-score-reporting applicants who would not previously have applied. And some of these applicants are shotgunning 20, 30+ applications just to see what sticks. Which means, at many schools, accepted students will have more options and yield will trend down. So the decline in admission rates is not linear.
Nope. Admission rate was 12% for class of 2026.