Anonymous wrote:DD just got accepted by MIT but we're neither qualified for any merits nor financial aid. The cost will be 73K+/yr and it is a lot of money. DD will likely get full-ride from state schools. DD is debating whether to invest 300K and attend state school for pre-med.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS was rejected from MIT. He is disappointed as MIT was his dream school and had worked very hard to maintain very good stats. He was accepted to Caltech, Georgia Tech and Berkeley MET. He wants to do electrical engineering. Which school would be the best for his major? He is leaning a bit to the MET program due to dual degree advantage and as he is interested in entrepreneurship.
He has received Stamp's scholarship at Georgia Tech, part scholarship at Berkeley. He had not looked into Caltech earlier but had just applied. Money is somewhat of a consideration but ultimately we want him to go to place that is best for him ( we do not mind taking loans). Understand that Caltech would be much higher fees. If we were not to consider money situation, any advice?
I’m sorry about MIT but your DS has amazing admits! I have heard Stamps is supposed to be amazing even without the money — lots of opportunities for the scholars! That would be in the running if it were my child. But look into GA tenure (they were making some changes, but not sure about current status), safety at school especially getting to and from airport, culture (cutthroat or collaborative?) GT has amazing school spirit as well. Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
I just know what my friends and professors at MIT said about Caltech. My one professor said that it was the one place he saw bunny ears on physics books from kids reading them, repeatedly. He felt like his lectures were a joke to some because they knew the material already. One friend described it as a much deeper nerdom than even MIT. "East campus" at MIT has that vibe, so that's how it was put to me.
I was in Greek life, sports and most of my friends were too. That POV is people very smart, dedicated to studies but also well balanced, love to party, etc. MIT was very fun place to be.
When were you there? At a certain point in time, there were shortages of housing, so most students, even new students lived at frats. Not as many women at the time, so there were fewer sororities. It really was not so long ago!
MIT has to provide more housing for undergrads, out of necessity/liability.
Anonymous wrote:DD just got accepted by MIT but we're neither qualified for any merits nor financial aid. The cost will be 73K+/yr and it is a lot of money. DD will likely get full-ride from state schools. DD is debating whether to invest 300K and attend state school for pre-med.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
I just know what my friends and professors at MIT said about Caltech. My one professor said that it was the one place he saw bunny ears on physics books from kids reading them, repeatedly. He felt like his lectures were a joke to some because they knew the material already. One friend described it as a much deeper nerdom than even MIT. "East campus" at MIT has that vibe, so that's how it was put to me.
I was in Greek life, sports and most of my friends were too. That POV is people very smart, dedicated to studies but also well balanced, love to party, etc. MIT was very fun place to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
My DS got into both schools and strongly preferred MIT over Cal Tech. A few of the reasons: MIT is more gender balanced whereas Cal Tech has significantly more men than women; everything is walking distance in Cambridge but Cal Tech is kind of far from stuff for someone without a car; Cal Tech is a much smaller school which means that there are fewer options and fewer opportunities if you decide to switch majors; from the DMV it’s so much easier and cheaper to get to Boston; Boston is a fabulous place to be a college student. No regrets.
Anonymous wrote:My DS was rejected from MIT. He is disappointed as MIT was his dream school and had worked very hard to maintain very good stats. He was accepted to Caltech, Georgia Tech and Berkeley MET. He wants to do electrical engineering. Which school would be the best for his major? He is leaning a bit to the MET program due to dual degree advantage and as he is interested in entrepreneurship.
He has received Stamp's scholarship at Georgia Tech, part scholarship at Berkeley. He had not looked into Caltech earlier but had just applied. Money is somewhat of a consideration but ultimately we want him to go to place that is best for him ( we do not mind taking loans). Understand that Caltech would be much higher fees. If we were not to consider money situation, any advice?
Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
I just know what my friends and professors at MIT said about Caltech. My one professor said that it was the one place he saw bunny ears on physics books from kids reading them, repeatedly. He felt like his lectures were a joke to some because they knew the material already. One friend described it as a much deeper nerdom than even MIT. "East campus" at MIT has that vibe, so that's how it was put to me.
I was in Greek life, sports and most of my friends were too. That POV is people very smart, dedicated to studies but also well balanced, love to party, etc. MIT was very fun place to be.
When were you there? At a certain point in time, there were shortages of housing, so most students, even new students lived at frats. Not as many women at the time, so there were fewer sororities. It really was not so long ago!
MIT has to provide more housing for undergrads, out of necessity/liability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
I just know what my friends and professors at MIT said about Caltech. My one professor said that it was the one place he saw bunny ears on physics books from kids reading them, repeatedly. He felt like his lectures were a joke to some because they knew the material already. One friend described it as a much deeper nerdom than even MIT. "East campus" at MIT has that vibe, so that's how it was put to me.
I was in Greek life, sports and most of my friends were too. That POV is people very smart, dedicated to studies but also well balanced, love to party, etc. MIT was very fun place to be.
Anonymous wrote:My DS was rejected from MIT. He is disappointed as MIT was his dream school and had worked very hard to maintain very good stats. He was accepted to Caltech, Georgia Tech and Berkeley MET. He wants to do electrical engineering. Which school would be the best for his major? He is leaning a bit to the MET program due to dual degree advantage and as he is interested in entrepreneurship.
He has received Stamp's scholarship at Georgia Tech, part scholarship at Berkeley. He had not looked into Caltech earlier but had just applied. Money is somewhat of a consideration but ultimately we want him to go to place that is best for him ( we do not mind taking loans). Understand that Caltech would be much higher fees. If we were not to consider money situation, any advice?
Anonymous wrote:So, I take it that MIT > Cal Tech? Why?? Does MIT offer more popular majors, better research opportunities, greater inter-disciplinary approach? What is the allure? I'd rather take Pasadena weather than Cambridge in the winter!
Anonymous wrote:My DS was rejected from MIT. He is disappointed as MIT was his dream school and had worked very hard to maintain very good stats. He was accepted to Caltech, Georgia Tech and Berkeley MET. He wants to do electrical engineering. Which school would be the best for his major? He is leaning a bit to the MET program due to dual degree advantage and as he is interested in entrepreneurship.
He has received Stamp's scholarship at Georgia Tech, part scholarship at Berkeley. He had not looked into Caltech earlier but had just applied. Money is somewhat of a consideration but ultimately we want him to go to place that is best for him ( we do not mind taking loans). Understand that Caltech would be much higher fees. If we were not to consider money situation, any advice?