Anonymous wrote:So now VDH needs to adapt and then we can unmask?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS isn't even acknowledging March 1.
The various fcps newsletters, weekly email from school, SB newsletter, etc has said NOTHING about March 1. There are long wordy paragraphs about XYZ, but nothing about masks post Mar 1.
They're in denial of the inevitable.
It's their passive aggressive 'in denial' approach.
Scroll upthread. It's all there, clear, detailed, and surprisingly pretty sane.
Up until just this morning, FCPS and Brandbrand were radio silent.
Brabrand's email upthread was sent today - barely 3 days before mask optional.
Way to wait until the last possible moment to acknowledge the elephant in the room. I'm surprised he didn't send the email at 5pm on a Friday.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/covid-by-county.html
And you would complain about our pinky toe hurting..... Anything to bash. Take as a step forward or take your kids out of public school and move on.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS isn't even acknowledging March 1.
The various fcps newsletters, weekly email from school, SB newsletter, etc has said NOTHING about March 1. There are long wordy paragraphs about XYZ, but nothing about masks post Mar 1.
They're in denial of the inevitable.
It's their passive aggressive 'in denial' approach.
Scroll upthread. It's all there, clear, detailed, and surprisingly pretty sane.
Up until just this morning, FCPS and Brandbrand were radio silent.
Brabrand's email upthread was sent today - barely 3 days before mask optional.
Way to wait until the last possible moment to acknowledge the elephant in the room. I'm surprised he didn't send the email at 5pm on a Friday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?
I don't think you are following what people are saying. There were many sane people that were fighting the removal of the mask mandate while Omicron was still surging. Now that the Omicron peak has passed and numbers (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) are plummeting, this is exactly the time to begin the off-ramp. Not when Youngkin signed his illegal EO.
By the way, the FCPS metrics (moderate for 7 days) will probably be met by mid-March. So, for all of the celebrating about the recent law change, the state and FCPS will be almost exactly aligned on the end of mask mandates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm burning all my masks today. LET'S GO!! My middle schoolers don't want to take them off for cosmetic reasons (they also want to see what their friends will do), but I'm so happy about this.
Cosmetic reasons?
I believe that, many kids this age are super conscious of their looks and don’t mind hiding behind a mask.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?
I don't think you are following what people are saying. There were many sane people that were fighting the removal of the mask mandate while Omicron was still surging. Now that the Omicron peak has passed and numbers (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) are plummeting, this is exactly the time to begin the off-ramp. Not when Youngkin signed his illegal EO.
By the way, the FCPS metrics (moderate for 7 days) will probably be met by mid-March. So, for all of the celebrating about the recent law change, the state and FCPS will be almost exactly aligned on the end of mask mandates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?
I don't think you are following what people are saying. There were many sane people that were fighting the removal of the mask mandate while Omicron was still surging. Now that the Omicron peak has passed and numbers (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) are plummeting, this is exactly the time to begin the off-ramp. Not when Youngkin signed his illegal EO.
By the way, the FCPS metrics (moderate for 7 days) will probably be met by mid-March. So, for all of the celebrating about the recent law change, the state and FCPS will be almost exactly aligned on the end of mask mandates.
Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?
Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?