Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Skating isn't a thing here - it's not the culture. You'd need to move north to get what you want.
Ice hockey is one of the fastest growing sports in the DMV.
It's easy to be the fastest growing when the baseline is near zero
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Skating isn't a thing here - it's not the culture. You'd need to move north to get what you want.
Ice hockey is one of the fastest growing sports in the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:Skating isn't a thing here - it's not the culture. You'd need to move north to get what you want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The economics of running an ice rink are pretty daunting. Its not too bad in the winter, but keeping the ice full (and by full, I mean getting roughly $500 of revenue per hour per rink) in summer is hard. Every time a new rink or sheet of ice is opened, that means that thousands of dollars of extra ice-time need to be sold. And that's hard. Black Bear Sports Group - which owns Piney Orchard and Ice World in Md. and I think is now managing Ft. DuPont - specializes in buying financially distressed rinks, and then renting the ice to hockey teams and tournaments they also control. It seems like a pretty good system, but its not easy to replicate.
But Cabin John and Wheaton are fully scheduled at all times. Their freestyle and public sessions are packed with people. I almost think it's unsafe that they allow so many people on the rink at one time during public skate. I think that, if each Cabin John and Wheaton built even one additional rink, it would be full all the time.
With what money? County tax money? Land close in is really really pricey now. The rec dept doesnt even have $ to staff libraries fully and open more hours on weekends or keep up with maintenance.
It's not like people skate for free. Each skater pays $16 per hour for freestyle skating. Public skate is $8 per hour. And the sessions are totally packed with people. And if the rinks raised the rates, I am guessing that people would pay it.
In contrast, there is no charge to use a library.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The economics of running an ice rink are pretty daunting. Its not too bad in the winter, but keeping the ice full (and by full, I mean getting roughly $500 of revenue per hour per rink) in summer is hard. Every time a new rink or sheet of ice is opened, that means that thousands of dollars of extra ice-time need to be sold. And that's hard. Black Bear Sports Group - which owns Piney Orchard and Ice World in Md. and I think is now managing Ft. DuPont - specializes in buying financially distressed rinks, and then renting the ice to hockey teams and tournaments they also control. It seems like a pretty good system, but its not easy to replicate.
But Cabin John and Wheaton are fully scheduled at all times. Their freestyle and public sessions are packed with people. I almost think it's unsafe that they allow so many people on the rink at one time during public skate. I think that, if each Cabin John and Wheaton built even one additional rink, it would be full all the time.
With what money? County tax money? Land close in is really really pricey now. The rec dept doesnt even have $ to staff libraries fully and open more hours on weekends or keep up with maintenance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowie built a huge fancy rink about 20 years ago. My understanding is that it’s a financial drain on the city.
I’m generally in favor of public facilities and I enjoy ice skating but really rinks seem like such an environmental disaster, I’m not really sure why public entities should be subsidizing this MC and UMC hobby. Just cause you grew up playing these sports in Boston or Minneapolis doesn’t mean we need to have that level of support for it here in Maryland. If forced to chose, I’d pick more pools as it is more accessible cardiovascular exercises that is much healthier for the joints, plus swim safety is important for everyone, so from a public health perspective, pools are much more beneficial than ice rinks.
This
Anonymous wrote:Bowie built a huge fancy rink about 20 years ago. My understanding is that it’s a financial drain on the city.
I’m generally in favor of public facilities and I enjoy ice skating but really rinks seem like such an environmental disaster, I’m not really sure why public entities should be subsidizing this MC and UMC hobby. Just cause you grew up playing these sports in Boston or Minneapolis doesn’t mean we need to have that level of support for it here in Maryland. If forced to chose, I’d pick more pools as it is more accessible cardiovascular exercises that is much healthier for the joints, plus swim safety is important for everyone, so from a public health perspective, pools are much more beneficial than ice rinks.
Anonymous wrote:
I love this idea! Especially with the Yards trying to push TSNY out. I know their circus camps for kids are really popular so there’s clearly local interest.
Anonymous wrote:Bowie built a huge fancy rink about 20 years ago. My understanding is that it’s a financial drain on the city.
I’m generally in favor of public facilities and I enjoy ice skating but really rinks seem like such an environmental disaster, I’m not really sure why public entities should be subsidizing this MC and UMC hobby. Just cause you grew up playing these sports in Boston or Minneapolis doesn’t mean we need to have that level of support for it here in Maryland. If forced to chose, I’d pick more pools as it is more accessible cardiovascular exercises that is much healthier for the joints, plus swim safety is important for everyone, so from a public health perspective, pools are much more beneficial than ice rinks.
Anonymous wrote:Reston is also run by a group that bought it as a distressed asset. Paul Mulvey is the one who took it fro
tennis club to ice rink. You can see the court material in the Olympic rink still.
My beer league team plays at Reston. We keep hearing the rink isn't long for this world, as the land would be super valuable for other development. Anyone have any real information on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The economics of running an ice rink are pretty daunting. Its not too bad in the winter, but keeping the ice full (and by full, I mean getting roughly $500 of revenue per hour per rink) in summer is hard. Every time a new rink or sheet of ice is opened, that means that thousands of dollars of extra ice-time need to be sold. And that's hard. Black Bear Sports Group - which owns Piney Orchard and Ice World in Md. and I think is now managing Ft. DuPont - specializes in buying financially distressed rinks, and then renting the ice to hockey teams and tournaments they also control. It seems like a pretty good system, but its not easy to replicate.
But Cabin John and Wheaton are fully scheduled at all times. Their freestyle and public sessions are packed with people. I almost think it's unsafe that they allow so many people on the rink at one time during public skate. I think that, if each Cabin John and Wheaton built even one additional rink, it would be full all the time.