Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Apparently anybody can run as a candidate in the GOP. No misdeed is too low to disqualify potential candidates.

An Indiana man running for a seat on the Clinton Township Board won the GOP primary while he is in jail for the murder of his wife (he bashed her in the head and threw her in a creek).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/06/indiana-gop-murder-andrew-wilhoite/

If he had gotten zero votes, he still would have qualified. Do some research.

The township board consists of three members and only three candidates entered the Republican field, while no one filed to run on the Democratic ticket. Wilhoite garnered 60 votes, compared to his competitors’ 110 and 106 votes, stats cited by the newspaper show.

Anyone facing felony charges can still run for local office, but they become ineligible upon conviction, state election officials told the newspaper.

“Under our legal system, every person is innocent until proven guilty,” said Brad King, co-director of the Indiana Election Division. “If a candidate is ultimately convicted, then depending upon the timing of that conviction, the person can be replaced on the ballot by the political party that has a vacancy.”

But King noted there’s no law barring anyone who is jailed ahead of trial from “exercising the duties of their office” if they get elected.

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/andrew-wilhoite-charged-with-killing-wife-wins-primary-election/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Apparently anybody can run as a candidate in the GOP. No misdeed is too low to disqualify potential candidates.

An Indiana man running for a seat on the Clinton Township Board won the GOP primary while he is in jail for the murder of his wife (he bashed her in the head and threw her in a creek).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/06/indiana-gop-murder-andrew-wilhoite/

The township board consists of three members and only three candidates entered the Republican field, while no one filed to run on the Democratic ticket. Wilhoite garnered 60 votes, compared to his competitors’ 110 and 106 votes, stats cited by the newspaper show.

Anyone facing felony charges can still run for local office, but they become ineligible upon conviction, state election officials told the newspaper.

“Under our legal system, every person is innocent until proven guilty,” said Brad King, co-director of the Indiana Election Division. “If a candidate is ultimately convicted, then depending upon the timing of that conviction, the person can be replaced on the ballot by the political party that has a vacancy.”

But King noted there’s no law barring anyone who is jailed ahead of trial from “exercising the duties of their office” if they get elected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MTG is slated to testify to the 1/6/21 Committee tomorrow, April 22. I’d watch the heck out of it if it were televised.

It’s not to the January 6 Committee, it’s to a judge in the lawsuit by her constituents trying to keep her off the ballot. And it WILL be televised!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

And I've got a swamp to sell in Florida....

Sell it to the constituents that voted that con artist in. They might be the ones open to a swindle

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

And I've got a swamp to sell in Florida....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

She was grasping for a narrative to push.

Look at her original text during January 6 - "Mark I was just told there is an active shooter on the first floor of the Capitol Please tell the President to calm people This isn't the way to solve anything"

She knew Trump pushed this and could get the crowd to back down. That was her initial inclination, not Antifa. She knew the whole time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

She was grasping for a narrative to push.

Look at her original text during January 6 - "Mark I was just told there is an active shooter on the first floor of the Capitol Please tell the President to calm people This isn't the way to solve anything"

She knew Trump pushed this and could get the crowd to back down. That was her initial inclination, not Antifa. She knew the whole time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

She thought January 6 was Antifa. That’s not smart.

Anonymous wrote:Is the dude who founded 4chan still running for AZ Congress?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Marjorie said she never discussed martial (Marshall) law with anyone, she wasn't being truthful?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/25/politics/read-mark-meadows-texts-sean-hannity-ivanka-trump-marjorie-taylor-greene/index.html

I read her texts. What struck me was the excellent composition, syntax, punctuation, and lack of misspellings. This different greatly from the texts from other people - mostly older men - to Mark Meadows.

MJT is actually decently smart. She's pure evil and a demagogue lunatic who is willing to embrace violence, but she actually has coherent and lucid thoughts. She's the most dangerous type of person with power.