Anonymous wrote:If I were one of the other two women the last thing I’d want is one last date with someone who was intent on breaking things off with me. I’d much prefer a call or even a text. The guy sounds like a narcissist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he should have known by now, 3 months in, that he wanted to be with you and should have already gradually stopped seeing the other women. This doesn’t feel great to me.
I think it's the height of immaturity to initiate an exclusivity talk and then, when the other person agrees, punish them because it hurts your feelings that they were not actually being exclusive before the talk happens. OP is too old for this mindset.
OP: I'm not punishing him for not being exclusive. I was dating other people also. He told me he was not serious with either of them, so I guess I don't understand why a phone call is not sufficient?
Because he's not a jerk? Because he already had dates planned with them and now is going to use that meeting to end things? Because he knows them better than you do and he has his reasons for why he wouldn't want to be intentionally hurtful to people that he likes and has enjoyed getting to know?
Uh, I can say as a woman that I would much prefer receiving a phone call from someone I had been casually dating, than having to go out with them one last time only to awkwardly sit there while he told me he needed to move on, had found someone else. etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he should have known by now, 3 months in, that he wanted to be with you and should have already gradually stopped seeing the other women. This doesn’t feel great to me.
I think it's the height of immaturity to initiate an exclusivity talk and then, when the other person agrees, punish them because it hurts your feelings that they were not actually being exclusive before the talk happens. OP is too old for this mindset.
OP: I'm not punishing him for not being exclusive. I was dating other people also. He told me he was not serious with either of them, so I guess I don't understand why a phone call is not sufficient?
Because he's not a jerk? Because he already had dates planned with them and now is going to use that meeting to end things? Because he knows them better than you do and he has his reasons for why he wouldn't want to be intentionally hurtful to people that he likes and has enjoyed getting to know?
Uh, I can say as a woman that I would much prefer receiving a phone call from someone I had been casually dating, than having to go out with them one last time only to awkwardly sit there while he told me he needed to move on, had found someone else. etc.
Anonymous wrote:I think his request is unreasonable, especially if it makes you uncomfortable. He has no obligation to these other women, as he was not exclusive with them either. A simple phone call or email would do. Something just doesn't feel right to me, OP. If he truly wants to be with you, and knows that his meeting up with a couple of other women to "wrap things up" doesn't feel good to you, then he shouldn't do it. His priority should be you, not them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he should have known by now, 3 months in, that he wanted to be with you and should have already gradually stopped seeing the other women. This doesn’t feel great to me.
I think it's the height of immaturity to initiate an exclusivity talk and then, when the other person agrees, punish them because it hurts your feelings that they were not actually being exclusive before the talk happens. OP is too old for this mindset.
OP: I'm not punishing him for not being exclusive. I was dating other people also. He told me he was not serious with either of them, so I guess I don't understand why a phone call is not sufficient?
Because he's not a jerk? Because he already had dates planned with them and now is going to use that meeting to end things? Because he knows them better than you do and he has his reasons for why he wouldn't want to be intentionally hurtful to people that he likes and has enjoyed getting to know?
Anonymous wrote:I think the issue that everyone's getting hung up on is that this guy is breaking things off in person with the other women. Which, great. But he doesn't need a "7-10 day break" from OP to do this, nor does he need to make a federal case out of it. Go have that 30 min coffee with Larla and Larlita and be done with it. It's honestly not OP's business or concern. The fact that he's giving her this much detail and making it an issue between the two of them is the flag. OP querying the situation "that seems kind of long" is reasonable. Like, why is he bringing it up at all? If he wants to make OP his girlfriend, that's all she needs to know.
tldr; dude is sketch, OP. Also the whole "I'm being punished for my transparency" is gross. I'd move on.
Anonymous wrote:I think the issue that everyone's getting hung up on is that this guy is breaking things off in person with the other women. Which, great. But he doesn't need a "7-10 day break" from OP to do this, nor does he need to make a federal case out of it. Go have that 30 min coffee with Larla and Larlita and be done with it. It's honestly not OP's business or concern. The fact that he's giving her this much detail and making it an issue between the two of them is the flag. OP querying the situation "that seems kind of long" is reasonable. Like, why is he bringing it up at all? If he wants to make OP his girlfriend, that's all she needs to know.
tldr; dude is sketch, OP. Also the whole "I'm being punished for my transparency" is gross. I'd move on.