Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

Exactly.

Ditto. My 85 year parents do not have photo ID and don’t travel by plane. They will not be able to vote with the new law.

So your parents never see the doctor? Photo ID required.

DP. I never have to show photo id at the doctor. Not when I go to my pcp, my gyn, my dermatologist, my opthamologist or my orthopedist.

Yes, you did the first time when you also gave them your insurance card. After that you’re correct.

Which means pp’s point stands. If you are already established with your doctors, you don’t need photo id to continue seeing your doctors. PP was saying you can’t go to a doctor at all without a photo id, so lack of a valid photo id would mean the other poster’s elderly parent could never go to the doctor since she does not have valid photo id.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

Exactly.

Ditto. My 85 year parents do not have photo ID and don’t travel by plane. They will not be able to vote with the new law.

So your parents never see the doctor? Photo ID required.

DP. I never have to show photo id at the doctor. Not when I go to my pcp, my gyn, my dermatologist, my opthamologist or my orthopedist.

Yes, you did the first time when you also gave them your insurance card. After that you’re correct.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

Exactly.

Ditto. My 85 year parents do not have photo ID and don’t travel by plane. They will not be able to vote with the new law.

So your parents never see the doctor? Photo ID required.

DP. I never have to show photo id at the doctor. Not when I go to my pcp, my gyn, my dermatologist, my opthamologist or my orthopedist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

Exactly.

Ditto. My 85 year parents do not have photo ID and don’t travel by plane. They will not be able to vote with the new law.

So your parents never see the doctor? Photo ID required.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

Exactly.

Ditto. My 85 year parents do not have photo ID and don’t travel by plane. They will not be able to vote with the new law.

Anonymous wrote:Republicans, answer this question honestly: do you prefer more people voting or fewer?

Anonymous wrote:Republicans, answer this question honestly: do you prefer more people voting or fewer?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

What is funny is that it is always the left that is accusing people of conspiracy theories.

Take a look at Delaware's voting laws sometime and come back and talk to us about early voting, drop boxes, etc, etc, etc.

Voting should be easy, but it must also be secure. Both sets of interests need to be protected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

What is funny is that it is always the left that is accusing people of conspiracy theories.

Take a look at Delaware's voting laws sometime and come back and talk to us about early voting, drop boxes, etc, etc, etc.

Voting should be easy, but it must also be secure. Both sets of interests need to be protected.

You know that there have been ongoing efforts to change Delaware's voting laws because even Republicans have acknowledged that they are needlessly draconian, right?

heh

The same Delaware with a Democrat governor and a supermajority of Democrats in the legislature?

Gee, I hope they are able to find time in their busy schedules to take on this critical issue we have been hearing about for years now...

Does it seem odd to you that Biden flew to GA to talk about their (comparably permissive) election laws in his speech when he could have just given his speech from Delaware?

I mean he is there every few weekends already so it seems like that would have saved some jet fuel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who think requiring a photo ID to vote (and a specific one at that), who think that removing ballot drop boxes in underserved areas, who think that cutting back on early voting, who think that shutting down polling places -- conveniently in areas where more Democrats tend to vote -- does NOT have any affect on people's access to voting have a limited imagination and a limited life experience.

I mean, that you cannot imagine how anyone would have any difficulty getting a new photo id that is approved for voting just goes to show the poverty of YOUR mind.

What is funny is that it is always the left that is accusing people of conspiracy theories.

Take a look at Delaware's voting laws sometime and come back and talk to us about early voting, drop boxes, etc, etc, etc.

Voting should be easy, but it must also be secure. Both sets of interests need to be protected.

You know that there have been ongoing efforts to change Delaware's voting laws because even Republicans have acknowledged that they are needlessly draconian, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread title is deliberately misleading. None of those Bills would prevent registered voters from voting.

Post reported.

It would prevent me from voting.

- registered voter

And anyone else with an expired license.

Such as my MIL, who does not need a valid driver's license, as she doesn't drive anymore, and who hasn't replaced it with an ID card because she is disabled and pretty much housebound.

THis. A lot of older people can't get out to the DL offices. They can't drive and have no transportation. My father's wallet was stolen in the hospital. He was never well enough again to make the trip to the driver's license office.

What about people like him? They are NOT few and far between,

Yes they are. Seriously, people that are physically incapable of getting an ID but who want to vote?

DP. You mean like lots of nursing home residents?

And guess what, they get bills addressed to then at their nursing homes....that can be used to vote.

WHat are you talking about? NO THEY CAN'T UNDER THE NEW LIMITS.

I think this thread is just one more piece of evidence that support for Youngkin is fundamentally based in ignorance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread title is deliberately misleading. None of those Bills would prevent registered voters from voting.

Post reported.

It would prevent me from voting.

- registered voter

And anyone else with an expired license.

Such as my MIL, who does not need a valid driver's license, as she doesn't drive anymore, and who hasn't replaced it with an ID card because she is disabled and pretty much housebound.

THis. A lot of older people can't get out to the DL offices. They can't drive and have no transportation. My father's wallet was stolen in the hospital. He was never well enough again to make the trip to the driver's license office.

What about people like him? They are NOT few and far between,

Yes they are. Seriously, people that are physically incapable of getting an ID but who want to vote?

DP. You mean like lots of nursing home residents?

And guess what, they get bills addressed to then at their nursing homes....that can be used to vote.

WHat are you talking about? NO THEY CAN'T UNDER THE NEW LIMITS.