Anonymous wrote:Bethesda 09's have been having a great run in MLSNext. They have not lost a game and have only given up one goal this year. That will be a tough bracket to come out of if you are not Bethesda.

A couple of close games, but they made it to the finals against SYC, who beat PPA in the morning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

It's U13, so nobody knows how good these teams are (or aren't), regardless of league. But I agree that this particular team was clearly underseeded. Second division would have been perfect. Bucks Wolfe should be in first in lieu of Arlington.

they tied their second game so fc Charles shouldn't have been there

Yeah, they tied the second game. Anything except winning that bracket is an embarrassment. Most of the kids on that team were / would be on second and third teams elsewhere.

They managed to squeak through to the finals by beating PPA’s second team 1-0.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bethesda’s top teams u15 and up are off to a rough start. They have not won a game. 0-5-2.

Treating them like showcases. As it should be.

Now do the 2010, 2009, and 2008 teams.

Don’t care about pre-pubescent soccer.

I would suspect most teams are allowing all players equal time for kids to be seen. I know our BSC team is not leaving the starting 11 on the field for more than 30 - 40 min. but hey if you judge quality of play and programs based on a college showcase then more power to you.

Want some peanut butter with that jelly?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

It's U13, so nobody knows how good these teams are (or aren't), regardless of league. But I agree that this particular team was clearly underseeded. Second division would have been perfect. Bucks Wolfe should be in first in lieu of Arlington.

they tied their second game so fc Charles shouldn't have been there

Yeah, they tied the second game. Anything except winning that bracket is an embarrassment. Most of the kids on that team were / would be on second and third teams elsewhere.

Anonymous wrote:Bethesda’s top teams u15 and up are off to a rough start. They have not won a game. 0-5-2.

Treating them like showcases. As it should be.

Now do the 2010, 2009, and 2008 teams.

Bethesda’s top teams u15 and up are off to a rough start. They have not won a game. 0-5-2.

Why are so many games earlier in the day not updated on their website?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

That is what BRYC does. Lose in league games and then play in tournaments/brackets that they can dominate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

It's U13, so nobody knows how good these teams are (or aren't), regardless of league. But I agree that this particular team was clearly underseeded. Second division would have been perfect. Bucks Wolfe should be in first in lieu of Arlington.

they tied their second game so fc Charles shouldn't have been there

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

It's U13, so nobody knows how good these teams are (or aren't), regardless of league. But I agree that this particular team was clearly underseeded. Second division would have been perfect. Bucks Wolfe should be in first in lieu of Arlington.

Anonymous wrote:Our first game at Muldoon was on a field that was significantly uphill/downhill from goal to goal. Amusing.

We used to joke - what was the score uphill vs downhill.

Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.

They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.

Our first game at Muldoon was on a field that was significantly uphill/downhill from goal to goal. Amusing.