Anonymous wrote:How many years of graduates are accounted for in the Lowell list above? One or last 5, last 10?
Anonymous wrote:Another takeaway is that one’s views of their K-8 experience likely turn on how happy they were with outplacement. The families that are happy of course think the K-8 model worked well for them. But are families whose kids were not admitted to their school of choice (whatever it was) still happy they chose the K-8 model?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:k-8 parent here with child at Big 3. Our experience at k-8 was great and our child did not find application process to be toxic. Our goal was NEVER Big 3 but best fit and we encouraged our child to do the same. We have another still at k-8 and they may or may not go to a Big 3.
Our child's cohort was very strong and over 30% of the class landed at STA/NCS, Sidwell, GDS. If you include Potomac/Holton/Maret it was 40%.
I agree with previous posters that it's typical that the top 20-25% of class will go to top schools but I will also say that these kids are high fliers (and that many parents think their kid is in the high flier category but the kid is not). That said - nothing is a guarantee; it also happens that (a) some kids get in that are not as academically strong (usually they have some special pull - whether known publicly or not) and (b) sometimes someone strong gets shut out for reasons unknown.
Bottom line is that, if your goal is Big 3 for HS, then try as early and as often as you can to apply there. A K-8 is not the place for you if you want this guarantee.
We'd never trade the k-8 experience but Big3 is not the priority.
What the PP did not disclose is how many of those admitted to top schools in 9th, from K8, were siblings or children or large donors. That plays a very large part and no one talks about it.
PP said it was a strong class. Unless you’re going to go back in time to enroll your own kid in that class, why does it matter?
Which K-8 - if you don’t mind sharing wildness like to know. 30-40% landing at those schools is very impressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids attended an upper NW DCPS elementary. Quite a few of the kids who couldn't hack it at our elementary and/or at Deal transferred into one K-8 or another along the way.
There are many smart kids at the K-8s (for sure), but they are also used by families as a softer alternative for kids who are struggling academically in public.
In contrast, the strongest public school kids all stayed in public through middle school.
Anyway, what I'm saying is that 20% heading on to the "Big3" from a K-8 is probably about right. The top 20% are probably appropriate for the elite, pressure cooker high schools. The K-8
schools have kids all over the academic spectrum, not unlike public schools.
My kids attended ... DCPS elementary. ... Anyway, what I'm saying is that 20% heading on to the "Big3" from a K-8 is probably about right.
"I'm saying that I'm confident that I know what happens inside the walls at private K-8 schools although I have no actual, direct experience with private schools."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:k-8 parent here with child at Big 3. Our experience at k-8 was great and our child did not find application process to be toxic. Our goal was NEVER Big 3 but best fit and we encouraged our child to do the same. We have another still at k-8 and they may or may not go to a Big 3.
Our child's cohort was very strong and over 30% of the class landed at STA/NCS, Sidwell, GDS. If you include Potomac/Holton/Maret it was 40%.
I agree with previous posters that it's typical that the top 20-25% of class will go to top schools but I will also say that these kids are high fliers (and that many parents think their kid is in the high flier category but the kid is not). That said - nothing is a guarantee; it also happens that (a) some kids get in that are not as academically strong (usually they have some special pull - whether known publicly or not) and (b) sometimes someone strong gets shut out for reasons unknown.
Bottom line is that, if your goal is Big 3 for HS, then try as early and as often as you can to apply there. A K-8 is not the place for you if you want this guarantee.
We'd never trade the k-8 experience but Big3 is not the priority.
PP said it was a strong class. Unless you’re going to go back in time to enroll your own kid in that class, why does it matter?
Which K-8 - if you don’t mind sharing wildness like to know. 30-40% landing at those schools is very impressive.