Anonymous wrote:He should have addressed and acknowledge it. He shouldn't have been fired.
Anonymous wrote:Unless the teacher also wore blackface before showing the movie, this is stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He should have addressed and acknowledge it. He shouldn't have been fired.
I think he did. He wasn't defiant.
That is true according to the article. The top PP didn’t bother to read the short article linked in the OP.
NP here, but that's probably because it's behind a pay wall. Why do posters do that?
Anonymous wrote:Does this mean Hamilton is banned too, or is that ok?
Anonymous wrote:He should have addressed and acknowledge it. He shouldn't have been fired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Geez, it's simple. Don't show things that use blackface. It's offensive, even on Olivier. Are there no other Othello productions he could show?
Yup — unless you’re teaching about blackface. This was a music composition class. Not clear why he was showing this film, but presumably whatever point he was making could have been made in a different way (using a different example, separating audio from video). And you always make strategic decisions like this when teaching — you don’t want the noise to drown out the signal.
You have absolutely no idea what his pedagogical goal was here and whether showing the Olivier Othello was important to meeting it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Geez, it's simple. Don't show things that use blackface. It's offensive, even on Olivier. Are there no other Othello productions he could show?
Yup — unless you’re teaching about blackface. This was a music composition class. Not clear why he was showing this film, but presumably whatever point he was making could have been made in a different way (using a different example, separating audio from video). And you always make strategic decisions like this when teaching — you don’t want the noise to drown out the signal.
You have absolutely no idea what his pedagogical goal was here and whether showing the Olivier Othello was important to meeting it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Geez, it's simple. Don't show things that use blackface. It's offensive, even on Olivier. Are there no other Othello productions he could show?
Yup — unless you’re teaching about blackface. This was a music composition class. Not clear why he was showing this film, but presumably whatever point he was making could have been made in a different way (using a different example, separating audio from video). And you always make strategic decisions like this when teaching — you don’t want the noise to drown out the signal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a path for redemption for him? If so, how must be atone?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2021/10/university-of-michigan-professor-steps-down-from-class-after-blackface-incident.html%3foutputType=amp
“The controversy surrounds Sheng’s showing the 1965 movie Othello on Sept. 10 to his undergraduate music composition seminar class. The film adaptation of the William Shakespeare play stars Laurence Olivier as the title character of the Moorish King, and features Olivier in blackface.”
The question should be: Is there a path to redemption for the university?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is a two-time Pulitzer nominee and a recipient of a MacArthur fellowship. And he has to leave the university for showing an Oscar nominated film. The university should defend him. Instead they’re too scared of accusations of racism to support their own scholars.
This is beyond stupid.
I really don't get the issue with blackface (and I'm Black btw). A character is black, is played by a white person (who colors his face black to play the role). Why is that by itself racist? People are such sensitive pu**ies these days! I bet most Black people don't care about this (none of my friends do). It's the woke White crowd..