Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s good to remember that second graders aren’t reliable narrators. I’m sure he ate inside but there may be more to it.
Ugh the the relatable narrator phrase 🙄
The OP sounds like she hit the roof before getting the whole story. Her own title is "APS had my 2nd grader...". APS (as a system) was not responsible, this was a teacher decision. So, email the teacher!! Find out what's going on. THEN react. Don't just freak out because of a story your 7 year old told you. He may have it mostly right, but the entire crux on her anger is intent. She may not completely understand the teacher's intentions here. The best way to find those is to talk to the other adults. Once the teacher confirms she is using her hcild as a reward system (IF that is what is happening) then you can elevate this to other channels and let her know you don't think that's appropriate.
OP here--just received a call from the Assistant Principal and SPED aide. Immediately off the bat they stated that it was a decision made on the spot and it was a mistake. They said the staff member didn't know that kids should eat outside on nice days.
I call BS. I'm sorry--that has been the most contentious issue of returning to in person school and if staff don't understand the gravity of the risks that come with that situation and that they are way out of bounds if they think that it is their own discretion to uniquely put a child at risk without the parent's consent or awareness, then I don't even know what to say.
They acknowledged that it is the other child who needs support, and not my child, so, my child will not be singled out in that way going forward and they will modify lunch and recess for the other child as needed.
I described it as APS to indicate which system we were dealing with, but, did not name the school so as to not totally throw them under the bus though I am half tempted to. I emailed the SPED aide and principal immediately upon returning home last evening, so, I didn't wait around stewing over a child's hearsay.
great job making the lives of the school SPED harder, making a SPED kid’s life harder, and probably confusing your kid. Hope you’re happy!!!
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that you guys are okay with a child's presence being a reward for another child who behaves?!
That's crazy!
I would be irate if my kid came home and told me that they weren't allowed to eat outside with the class because Larlo was good and won their presence as a reward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm, how exactly is your kid’s health and safety impacted?
Also, you’re crazy.
FFS. Because maskless indoor lunch during a pandemic is profoundly stupid.
Get help for your anxiety.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s good to remember that second graders aren’t reliable narrators. I’m sure he ate inside but there may be more to it.
Ugh the the relatable narrator phrase 🙄
The OP sounds like she hit the roof before getting the whole story. Her own title is "APS had my 2nd grader...". APS (as a system) was not responsible, this was a teacher decision. So, email the teacher!! Find out what's going on. THEN react. Don't just freak out because of a story your 7 year old told you. He may have it mostly right, but the entire crux on her anger is intent. She may not completely understand the teacher's intentions here. The best way to find those is to talk to the other adults. Once the teacher confirms she is using her hcild as a reward system (IF that is what is happening) then you can elevate this to other channels and let her know you don't think that's appropriate.
OP here--just received a call from the Assistant Principal and SPED aide. Immediately off the bat they stated that it was a decision made on the spot and it was a mistake. They said the staff member didn't know that kids should eat outside on nice days.
I call BS. I'm sorry--that has been the most contentious issue of returning to in person school and if staff don't understand the gravity of the risks that come with that situation and that they are way out of bounds if they think that it is their own discretion to uniquely put a child at risk without the parent's consent or awareness, then I don't even know what to say.
They acknowledged that it is the other child who needs support, and not my child, so, my child will not be singled out in that way going forward and they will modify lunch and recess for the other child as needed.
I described it as APS to indicate which system we were dealing with, but, did not name the school so as to not totally throw them under the bus though I am half tempted to. I emailed the SPED aide and principal immediately upon returning home last evening, so, I didn't wait around stewing over a child's hearsay.
great job making the lives of the school SPED harder, making a SPED kid’s life harder, and probably confusing your kid. Hope you’re happy!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, was it lunch bunch with the guidance counselor? You'll sound crazy if you go in ranting about having your kid participate in lunch bunch. It's usually a nice program with the counselor and a small group of students who talk about emotional regulation skills and other social skills. Totally different than isolating your kid or using him as an incentive.
Yes, it sounds like lunch bunch to me. You can opt out.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like that your kid is the reward. It puts way too much pressure on him and it's not a healthy dynamic. I'd definitely call the teacher and say you don't want your kid excluded from the class or used as a reward or punishment. You are fine with your kid being a buddy, the SN kid eating with the class, and the kid playing with him at recess if they want, but it's unfair to exclude your child
Anonymous wrote:OP- it’s fine to discuss this with principal- just remember to be[b] kind and reasonable.[b]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, both of my kids were brought into lunch bunches with various kids throughout their elementary years in APS. We were never informed ahead of time, and I never really thought much about them. The kids would mention them in passing, like "Larlo invited me to his lunch bunch today". And yes, we knew that Larlo had some social or emotional issues, but the kids never acted like it was an imposition or that they would have preferred to be with the rest of the kids in the cafeteria. Some kids can't handle the noise/chaos of being around 100 kids at the same time (have you gone to lunch at one of the schools? The noise can be deafening). The lunch bunch is a calmer environment, that can allow more environmentally sensitive kids to have fun and make friends.
Picking up on this, lunch bunch can be a valuable experience for neurotypical kids as well. It helps them learn to communicate and cooperate with people who aren’t just like them, and helps them get to know other kid’s who aren’t just like them so they are less likely to stereotype and exhibit bias toward people later in life. These are good experiences for kids to have, and something they don’t get when their parents freak out over them spending one lunch period sitting with a kid who isn’t just like them.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, both of my kids were brought into lunch bunches with various kids throughout their elementary years in APS. We were never informed ahead of time, and I never really thought much about them. The kids would mention them in passing, like "Larlo invited me to his lunch bunch today". And yes, we knew that Larlo had some social or emotional issues, but the kids never acted like it was an imposition or that they would have preferred to be with the rest of the kids in the cafeteria. Some kids can't handle the noise/chaos of being around 100 kids at the same time (have you gone to lunch at one of the schools? The noise can be deafening). The lunch bunch is a calmer environment, that can allow more environmentally sensitive kids to have fun and make friends.
Picking up on this, lunch bunch can be a valuable experience for neurotypical kids as well. It helps them learn to communicate and cooperate with people who aren’t just like them, and helps them get to know other kid’s who aren’t just like them so they are less likely to stereotype and exhibit bias toward people later in life. These are good experiences for kids to have, and something they don’t get when their parents freak out over them spending one lunch period sitting with a kid who isn’t just like them.