Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys are complaining about static rankings but what other schools deserve at least a 4.1 out of 5 for reputation?! You could make an argument for NYU because of Stern but that's about it. All of the other schools between 26- 50 are not on that level of elite. The fact that this doesn't change much makes it valid.
See above. That is an absurd argument - not changing makes a peer list valid? Quite the opposite - Dynamic rankings that reflect excellent collaborative research that are cited by peers is what makes a ranking list of academic institutions valid.
Anonymous wrote:You guys are complaining about static rankings but what other schools deserve at least a 4.1 out of 5 for reputation?! You could make an argument for NYU because of Stern but that's about it. All of the other schools between 26- 50 are not on that level of elite. The fact that this doesn't change much makes it valid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Princeton 4.8
2. Columbia 4.7
Harvard 4.9
MIT 4.9
5. Yale 4.8
6. Stanford 4.9
U Chicago 4.6
8. UPenn 4.6
Caltech 4.6
9. Duke 4.5
John's Hopkins 4.7
Northwestern 4.4
13. Dartmouth 4.4
14. Brown 4.5
Vanderbilt 4.3
WashU 4.2
17. Cornell 4.6
Rice 4.1
19. Notre Dame 4.2
20. UCLA 4.4
21. Emory 4.2
22. UC Berkeley 4.7
23. Georgetown 4.2
U Michigan 4.5
25. Carnegie Mellon 4.3
UVA 4.3
You're welcome! However a caveat... There are several important factors that should go into the rankings and peer reputation is only one factor. Student selectivity and institutional resources matter for the entire quality of the school. Peer Reputation can also be gamer as well.
HYPSM comprise the top 5 for peer reputation.
I don’t trust this peer review … how do they decide who matters? Unlike real life these lists barely move… I just don’t believe the same places each year have monopolies on top quality teaching and learning …
Pay to peer play?
Old fart peer ranking conventions ?
Skulls and bones/ other secret societies ?
It just is not plausible that same institutions that mainly recruit from top 1% and legacies continue to dominate educational excellence in reality (in perception obviously is possible). It is rigged somehow. Maybe we are so desperate for order in our chaotic world that we collectively buy into this mass delusion of static hierarchies …
+1
They need transparent quantifiable data to support these static “peer ranked” hierarchies - for starters academic relevance could be measured in numbers of citations in different fields …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Princeton 4.8
2. Columbia 4.7
Harvard 4.9
MIT 4.9
5. Yale 4.8
6. Stanford 4.9
U Chicago 4.6
8. UPenn 4.6
Caltech 4.6
9. Duke 4.5
John's Hopkins 4.7
Northwestern 4.4
13. Dartmouth 4.4
14. Brown 4.5
Vanderbilt 4.3
WashU 4.2
17. Cornell 4.6
Rice 4.1
19. Notre Dame 4.2
20. UCLA 4.4
21. Emory 4.2
22. UC Berkeley 4.7
23. Georgetown 4.2
U Michigan 4.5
25. Carnegie Mellon 4.3
UVA 4.3
You're welcome! However a caveat... There are several important factors that should go into the rankings and peer reputation is only one factor. Student selectivity and institutional resources matter for the entire quality of the school. Peer Reputation can also be gamer as well.
HYPSM comprise the top 5 for peer reputation.
I don’t trust this peer review … how do they decide who matters? Unlike real life these lists barely move… I just don’t believe the same places each year have monopolies on top quality teaching and learning …
Pay to peer play?
Old fart peer ranking conventions ?
Skulls and bones/ other secret societies ?
It just is not plausible that same institutions that mainly recruit from top 1% and legacies continue to dominate educational excellence in reality (in perception obviously is possible). It is rigged somehow. Maybe we are so desperate for order in our chaotic world that we collectively buy into this mass delusion of static hierarchies …
Anonymous wrote:It is difficult to say what they are responding to when they respond to this question. Are they thinking of the university overall? Are they thinking only of the undergraduate program? Are the responses really some mix of the above?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
This.
Jhu undergrad is a quality education full stop in arts, sciences, and applied stuff like engineering.
Jhu gets dinged because the student body isn’t attractive for the most part and they really need to beef up their career services.
Jhu needs to hire away penn’s career services staff
JHU is very one-sided school. Just pre-med or bust
Jhu english dept is top notch. Same with history and Physics. Just to pick a few. There are very few schools academically as strong in as wide of subjects as jhu.
Jhu suffers because location, student body isn’t f’able outside of maybe 10% of the class, and they should probably have a required course for all kids by some entertainment agents on how to sell yourself, small talk, polish etc. Like a two-semester series of “finishing school”.
Bloomie should also write a check to get all jhu sports outside of football, D1.
That would help as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
This.
Jhu undergrad is a quality education full stop in arts, sciences, and applied stuff like engineering.
Jhu gets dinged because the student body isn’t attractive for the most part and they really need to beef up their career services.
Jhu needs to hire away penn’s career services staff
JHU is very one-sided school. Just pre-med or bust
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
JHU too high. Belongs in 14 with Dartmouth, Berkeley, etc.
No way. Not if the measure is strictly academics. It’s correctly placed on that list, drop penn actually to the duke northwestern tier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
JHU too high. Belongs in 14 with Dartmouth, Berkeley, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
This.
Jhu undergrad is a quality education full stop in arts, sciences, and applied stuff like engineering.
Jhu gets dinged because the student body isn’t attractive for the most part and they really need to beef up their career services.
Jhu needs to hire away penn’s career services staff
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:** I forgot Michigan
1.Harvard, Stanford
3.MIT, Princeton,
5. Yale, Columbia
7. U Chicago, Caltech, John's Hopkins, Upenn
11. Duke, Northwestern, Brown
14. Dartmouth,*UCB
16. Cornell, *UCLA, Vanderbilt
19. Rice, Carnegie Mellon, WashU, Emory, Notre Dame, Georgetown
25. Gatech, UNC, UVA, Michigan
29. UT Austin, Wisconsin-Madison
Johns Hopkins should not be that high... I'd put it alongside Dartmouth/UCB/Cornell/UCLA. Vanderbilt should also be one tier down.
JHU is easily a top 10 institution. It is hard as hell, and you don't get watered down garbage courses/grades like you do at other 'top' institutions that will not be named. I went to a top 50 undergrad institution, then did my PhD at JHU where I had to teach undergrads. The undergrads at JHU are just on a whole different level of intelligence. JHU gets bad marks for 'undergrad life' simply because it is so hard and all the kids do is study their tails off. Almost every single undergrad and grad student I know from my entire time there went on to med school, wall street, top 3 consulting firms, or top 5-10 grad schools. JHU has extraordinary placement in med schools - 100% of the kids who worked in our lab for undergrad research ended up going to med school at places like UCSF, Stanford, Harvard, and Einstein.
Also, JHU is ranked high because of its grad programs - this is a peer reputation ranking. JHU gets the most funding from the NIH out of any university, and has a top 3 med school. JHU is always near the top in terms of publications relative to impact factor (and given its size), plus always punches above its weight for patents generated.
JHU too high. Belongs in 14 with Dartmouth, Berkeley, etc.