Anonymous wrote:Please stop referring to Fetlife messages using CB or Anastasia. Juliana and BB created the account and wrote/replied to JR.
Facts:
1. At some point in message exchange, knife was discussed. Juliana (likely) or Brendan wrote something like never considered it or no.
2. JR said himself (his mom confirmed) that he’d never done it except as a prop, laying it on bed, or something to that effect.
3. Admitted into evidence: Juliana testified/read parts of the letters to/from BB and Tess. She read in court that Tess wrote “snitches get stitches.”
4. Admitted into evidence: Letter to Juliana. Brendan wrote that his mother Tess created a hostile environment in the home (every day) and how it affected him. No mention of his child being affected by this hostile environment.
Along with Count 4 child endangerment, 3 and 4 above will certainly be all CPS or whatever agency needs to give custody to the Benson family (grandparents and aunt).
I have no doubt the former au pair will be a part of the child’s life (not custodial). She loved both CB and V. They were both in her bridal party. They had weekly calls. Many posts on her Instagram.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone post link to the actual snitches get stitches letter in evidence? What is the date it was put into evidence?
Authorities monitored her phone conversations at the Fairfax County jail. In one call last month, Clingan said that Brendan Banfield's mother, who has paid for the au pair's legal defense, discussed the consequences that 'snitches' in the jail would face.
In another, between Brendan Banfield and the au pair, Magalhães said: "I hope you are not just staying with me because you are afraid I'm going to turn against you."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone post link to the actual snitches get stitches letter in evidence? What is the date it was put into evidence?
No evidence. It was reported by the media that CW mentioned in a hearing.
That's what I thought but the other poster made it sound like it was in the trial. Would love to know the trial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone post link to the actual snitches get stitches letter in evidence? What is the date it was put into evidence?
No evidence. It was reported by the media that CW mentioned in a hearing.
Anonymous wrote:"I have no doubt the former au pair will be a part of the child’s life (not custodial). She loved both CB and V. They were both in her bridal party. They had weekly calls. Many posts on her Instagram."
I have to agree with the previous poster that we need to STOP with this about the former au pair. Unless you know her personally, you shouldn't be so insistent about this. She hasn't been in the child's life for several years now. Yes it's a nice thought, but it's in no way realistic.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone post link to the actual snitches get stitches letter in evidence? What is the date it was put into evidence?
Anonymous wrote:Please stop referring to Fetlife messages using CB or Anastasia. Juliana and BB created the account and wrote/replied to JR.
Facts:
1. At some point in message exchange, knife was discussed. Juliana (likely) or Brendan wrote something like never considered it or no.
2. JR said himself (his mom confirmed) that he’d never done it except as a prop, laying it on bed, or something to that effect.
3. Admitted into evidence: Juliana testified/read parts of the letters to/from BB and Tess. She read in court that Tess wrote “snitches get stitches.”
4. Admitted into evidence: Letter to Juliana. Brendan wrote that his mother Tess created a hostile environment in the home (every day) and how it affected him. No mention of his child being affected by this hostile environment.
Along with Count 4 child endangerment, 3 and 4 above will certainly be all CPS or whatever agency needs to give custody to the Benson family (grandparents and aunt).
I have no doubt the former au pair will be a part of the child’s life (not custodial). She loved both CB and V. They were both in her bridal party. They had weekly calls. Many posts on her Instagram.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think we will ever know all the details as someone else pointed out. But I think the basic fact that the blood splatter evidence so clearly points towards BB as being the one who stabbed her, is all that really matters when it boils down to it. That plus the fact that they clearly shot Joe and admitted to that, snd that it seems CB was killed after Joe based on timing of 911 calls. If she made the first call let’s say as soon as they walked in the house before the went to the room- like let’s say she called because maybe there was an intruder and BB told her to hang up and let him check it out first. Or she hung up on her own when she heard noises upstairs and decided to check it out on her own first. Then 15 min later the next call was made? And 5ish min later EMS arrived? And CB was still alive?
If BB went into the house and ran upstairs and saw this scene where Joe was stabbing her, why would he wait 15min to call 911? Why would he move Joes body?
Juliana called 911 when they were both back at the house. I think that was established. So it’s not disputed that she called 911, waited 15min and called again. If BB didn’t do the crime, what was he doing in those 15min? His story is she was already stabbed when he ran into the room. So why the delay in calling? That plus the blood evidence is all anyone needs. The digital evidence is ambiguous and we will never know the true story there