Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Which one has better coaching? Which one has better exposure. I’m confused.
Not a ton of exposure when you are at AS, 0-3 on day two and playing on field 13 while the contenders are in the stadium with the coaches.
However, imagine I was aware Deemer would attend, and there was a possibility he’d need to pass by field 13 on his way to the porta-potties. You never know what could come of that situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Which one has better coaching? Which one has better exposure. I’m confused.
Not a ton of exposure when you are at AS, 0-3 on day two and playing on field 13 while the contenders are in the stadium with the coaches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP and my daughter played for Capital as well. DO NOT LISTEN WHEN THEY TELL YOU NOT TO HELP YOUR KIDS WITH EMAILS ETC. These kids are overloaded and do not have time for anything more than grades and extra curriculars. Help them draft emails, let them give final approval and meet together to send them. Way too much for a teenager to do alone.
And yes 99% of the work is on the families. The club is simply brand recognition.
Thank you. I'm so sick of hearing people say if a teenager isn't good at administrative activities like emails and spreadsheets then they aren't D1 material. Please. Fact of the matter is many adult are overwhelmed and mystified by the process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Which one has better coaching? Which one has better exposure. I’m confused.
Anonymous wrote:Good luck to all the girls starting year 2 on varsity this spring. Wishing a healthy season to all of them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Which one has better coaching? Which one has better exposure. I’m confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Me. I don’t give a $hit about the coaching. It’s about exposure.
Anonymous wrote:Who wants to pay $900 for bad coaching.
Anonymous wrote:What fix is in?