Anonymous wrote:Did he run out of suits yet?

Anonymous wrote:Did he run out of suits yet?

Anonymous wrote:Did he run out of suits yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Your idea of justice is like the Wild West-- just shoot the bad guys. Seems you're okay with everyone executing those they think wronged or hurt them.

No, my idea of the justice system is equity for crimes, and not getting off easy (or entirely) if you're rich and/or white.

And also criminalizing people who profit on the misfortune of others.

That's an interesting idea. Will you get a scaled penalty depending on how white you are? Do mixed race people get half or quarter penalties? We would genetic tests to determine this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Your idea of justice is like the Wild West-- just shoot the bad guys. Seems you're okay with everyone executing those they think wronged or hurt them.

No, my idea of the justice system is equity for crimes, and not getting off easy (or entirely) if you're rich and/or white.

And also criminalizing people who profit on the misfortune of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Your idea of justice is like the Wild West-- just shoot the bad guys. Seems you're okay with everyone executing those they think wronged or hurt them.

No, my idea of the justice system is equity for crimes, and not getting off easy (or entirely) if you're rich and/or white.

And also criminalizing people who profit on the misfortune of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Your idea of justice is like the Wild West-- just shoot the bad guys. Seems you're okay with everyone executing those they think wronged or hurt them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Your idea of justice is like the Wild West-- just shoot the bad guys. Seems you're okay with everyone executing those they think wronged or hurt them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just as prison and the death penalty are supposed to be deterrents to bad behavior by others, maybe this will act as a deterrent to other health insurance executives acting in ways that screw their paying clients. I doubt it, but if the stakes were high enough, maybe these people would act in good faith and with empathy. After, of course, their 3rd vacation home is paid off.

Guess you're in favor of just shooting to death the violent men who stabbed and set fire to the innocent women traveling on public transportation? Just shoot all murderers to death?

As long the number of people you kill is less than the number they killed, you are golden.

I will assume that equal numbers, i.e., eye for an eye is OK as well.

Go to your nearest prison and assist with the death of all murderers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just as prison and the death penalty are supposed to be deterrents to bad behavior by others, maybe this will act as a deterrent to other health insurance executives acting in ways that screw their paying clients. I doubt it, but if the stakes were high enough, maybe these people would act in good faith and with empathy. After, of course, their 3rd vacation home is paid off.

Guess you're in favor of just shooting to death the violent men who stabbed and set fire to the innocent women traveling on public transportation? Just shoot all murderers to death?

As long the number of people you kill is less than the number they killed, you are golden.

I will assume that equal numbers, i.e., eye for an eye is OK as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.

Well, our justice system is an interesting justice system.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict jury nullification. United Health can afford to pays its executives $$$$$$$$$$$$, so it can deny $$$ insurance claims. Didn't feel sorry for the man then and still don't feel sorry for him or his family because they benefited from screwing people who paid hefty premiums for their claims to be denied.

There's nearly no chance for jury nullification unless the defense can come up with something that lets jurors argue reasonable doubt, even if it is a stretch. Otherwise the most you'll get is a hung jury, with him remaining remanded pending retrial.

Every one has an insurance horror story and it doesn't have to be United.

And most people know murder is wrong.

+1 I can't believe the people in this forum who rationalize breaking the law in various ways, including murder. Disgusting.

Murder is wrong, but let's not pretend like "the law" is based around morality or ethics. The UHC CEO may have been doing legal things, but far from moral or ethical. Luigi has blood on his hands, yes. But far, FAR less than the guy he killed.

That's an interesting justice system.