Ok, I might be old but is it normal for adult men to be playing these video games and making channels for them?

Anonymous wrote:Video from BB's gaming channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cPvjX7_G28

Channel Link

https://www.youtube.com/@ApocD21/featured

Is BB is earning any money from YouTube from this channel? I never click on channels of people I despise - would never want to put anything in their pocket.

When I heard the fake scripted line he made up for poor Joe, “she’s mine, she gave herself to me” I knew BB must be a dweeb gamer. And the vid was even more cringe than I expected. Smdh.

RIP Christine and Joe!

Anonymous wrote:The daughter is all over CB's PUBLIC instagram, so her mother clearly had no problem sharing her name and images.

Yes her mother might feel differently now that she, the mother, has been murdered by the father, and there are national headlines about the murder, and she might- MIGHT- not want this atrocity to follow her daughter around for the rest of her life as weirdos on the internet all talk about her by name and talk about how she should be raised. Just a guess.

Anonymous wrote:The daughter is all over CB's PUBLIC instagram, so her mother clearly had no problem sharing her name and images.

Uhhh what does that matter? Millions of moms post stuff about their kids. If my husband later murdered me and was found guilty in a highly publicized trial, I’d want my kids protected online as much as possible. But you can’t update your insta from the grave.

I love the last few weeks of Juliana’s life -

First, she had to get on the stand and explain in detail what she and BB did. Even though she minimized her role, that must have sucked so bad to admit all that stuff in front of a courtroom of people staring at her, horrified.

And while she’s on the stand, she looks over at that balding buffoon and realizes that she threw her life away for that… thing. He’s so gross. Girl, what were you thinking.

Then, her mortifying letters to BB and “Mimi” become public. People on the internet conclude she is hella dumb.

Then, her boyfriend, the “love of her life,” gets on the stand and basically dogs her. Says that she came on to him, he wasn’t really all that into it, and that she’s a total moron.

The only way this could get better is if she gets sentenced to 10 years. Let’s go!

The daughter is all over CB's PUBLIC instagram, so her mother clearly had no problem sharing her name and images.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Video from BB's gaming channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cPvjX7_G28

Channel Link

https://www.youtube.com/@ApocD21/featured

Omg!

Sweet mother of Jesus! What was a beautiful, accomplished woman like Christine doing with this loser?

As someone who has been following this case intently since Juliana was arrested in October 2023, I have to agree with some of the previous posters that the posts regarding the child are getting extremely repetitive and almost obsessive. Let's focus on the fact that BB was found guilty and at least Joe and Christine are getting some justice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got around to reviewing the evidence. A question for those who work in the court system. Why wasn’t Valerie‘s face redacted/blocked out in the defense’s pictures of her with BB?

I guess I understand the jury being shown her image but I don’t think the public at large needs to know what she looks like.

Didn't they seal the body cams that showed her the day of, for privacy reasons?

As for the pictures, my guess is either because those pictures were already public (from Facebook, instagram etc which I understand has been public for some time) or BB is the one who showed the pictures so it would be him asserting a right to privacy on behalf of his daughter. If he didn't want to seal it, up to him.

I hope whoever ends up with custody of her spends some time scrubbing the internet of her name and then legally changing it. And then moving away with her. So she can go through life without people staring at her and googling her, the way that they probably still do Burke Ramsey (as one example)

Anonymous wrote:I just got around to reviewing the evidence. A question for those who work in the court system. Why wasn’t Valerie‘s face redacted/blocked out in the defense’s pictures of her with BB?

I guess I understand the jury being shown her image but I don’t think the public at large needs to know what she looks like.

Didn't they seal the body cams that showed her the day of, for privacy reasons?

As for the pictures, my guess is either because those pictures were already public (from Facebook, instagram etc which I understand has been public for some time) or BB is the one who showed the pictures so it would be him asserting a right to privacy on behalf of his daughter. If he didn't want to seal it, up to him.

Anonymous wrote:Video from BB's gaming channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cPvjX7_G28

Channel Link

https://www.youtube.com/@ApocD21/featured

Omg!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems especially cruel that the Banfield family denied V from seeing Christine's sister who is probably the person in the world who shares the most DNA with her and I assume is the most similar in looks, age, demeanor. Etc. It could have been a great comfort.

The fixation on the daughter is getting creepy. It's just the same things being posted again and again.

I agree and I wish the posts where people are using her name would get deleted. Strangers talking like they know
Who the best person to raise her is, speculating about old babysitters and cousins and aunts and grandparents- leave this poor child alone. You don’t know her at all. And if you do know her, then stop posting your thoughts about her private business on DCUM for gods sake.

Anonymous wrote:The extreme secrecy around family courts permits them to operate to protect abusers, and there needs to be accountability and balance. In this case there is no way to remove the child from public knowledge. Ignoring what happens to her now is not giving her privacy. Continued placement with Tess, who appears to have erased child’s mother, denied contact with her family, and conducted a smear campaign against her son’s victims is not in the best interest of the child. She needs to be with safe adults who love her and will provide the extensive therapeutic support she needs.

Generally, family court reform is badly needed. The fox is in charge of the henhouse and think about every organization or system you know that works this way. Secrecy and lack of outside accountability always leads to bad outcomes.

We all hate that that evil murderer's family have control over the child, but what goes on with a family in family court is not your business. It should be private. That court does not owe accountability to you or other strangers. The accountability is to the family members not to crazed outsiders who want to storm a building with pitch forks.

Anonymous wrote:It seems especially cruel that the Banfield family denied V from seeing Christine's sister who is probably the person in the world who shares the most DNA with her and I assume is the most similar in looks, age, demeanor. Etc. It could have been a great comfort.

The fixation on the daughter is getting creepy. It's just the same things being posted again and again.