Anonymous wrote:Also the fact Anna had that software on his computer tells me she might have a slight tiny bit of a backbone - I’m slightly more hopeful she’s going to dump his a@& take the kids and move somewhere away from this insanity
Anonymous wrote:According to this article, Anna "thinks that this case is a conspiracy theory against her husband set up by the Biden administration" and she "believes that if Donald Trump was still in power this would not be happening, and refuses to believe he's done anything wrong."
https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2827783/josh-duggars-wife-anna-is-in-denial-and-at-war-with-jim-bob/
Anonymous wrote:I just read an article that described some of the images and I wish I hadn't. He is a monster. Absolute monster.
Anna is not going to protect those children from him. She's been trained since birth to defer to a man. And she's financially dependent on his family of enablers. This is a horrible mistake. Those poor children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also the fact Anna had that software on his computer tells me she might have a slight tiny bit of a backbone - I’m slightly more hopeful she’s going to dump his a@& take the kids and move somewhere away from this insanity
She had this monitoring software when the event happened two years ago, and has since chosen to have another child with him, so I don't think that's going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Also the fact Anna had that software on his computer tells me she might have a slight tiny bit of a backbone - I’m slightly more hopeful she’s going to dump his a@& take the kids and move somewhere away from this insanity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When the judge says the images were the "worse of the worst," it's got to be awful. He should not be out on bail and should not have access to his children.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/josh-duggar-child-pornography-case-trial-bail-home-confinement-000211966.html
I don't think that was the judge who said that. It was the investigator. A judge wouldn't comment on evidence at this stage,
Anonymous wrote:When the judge says the images were the "worse of the worst," it's got to be awful. He should not be out on bail and should not have access to his children.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/josh-duggar-child-pornography-case-trial-bail-home-confinement-000211966.html
Anonymous wrote:Funny, none of my evangelical "save the children" Facebook posters are saying a peep about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny, none of my evangelical "save the children" Facebook posters are saying a peep about this.
I wish I didn’t delete them to see how hypocritical they are.
Hypocritical like people coming on here to mock their "friends"
Anonymous wrote:Anna may be a complete idiot and continued to procreate - but there is no way he was truthful about the raid two years ago - that family is huge and this would have leaked. There are a few of them with actual morals. He had to have claimed the raid was about something else. Anna is a moron but I don’t think she’d have had more babies with someone about to go to 40 years of jail for child porn - and yes JB and M must be funding the legal fees and Anna’s life now - fortunately for her - her life might actually be slightly better with them than him - he’s probably abusive and a sex addict - at least w them the house is bigger, a few siblings live right there, she won’t be as isolated as she probably was