Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:John James of MI wins
So he can lose his third statewide general election in six years.
Anonymous wrote:John James of MI wins
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Senate is looking solid, 50-52 Dem is likely. With 51 the most probable. I’m way less confident the Dems can hold the house, it may be especially bad with all the gerrymandering.
Nate Silver's models are showing the Dems behind in the House but rising fast in the last month.
trumps’s eric lost in the mo senate primary
Trump's Eric was apparently Schmidtt
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Senate is looking solid, 50-52 Dem is likely. With 51 the most probable. I’m way less confident the Dems can hold the house, it may be especially bad with all the gerrymandering.
Nate Silver's models are showing the Dems behind in the House but rising fast in the last month.
trumps’s eric lost in the mo senate primary
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Senate is looking solid, 50-52 Dem is likely. With 51 the most probable. I’m way less confident the Dems can hold the house, it may be especially bad with all the gerrymandering.
Nate Silver's models are showing the Dems behind in the House but rising fast in the last month.
trumps’s eric lost in the mo senate primary
Guess who's down there helping to run that election? Fontes, same guy who was voted out of Maricopa. SurPRISE....notAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Senate is looking solid, 50-52 Dem is likely. With 51 the most probable. I’m way less confident the Dems can hold the house, it may be especially bad with all the gerrymandering.
Nate Silver's models are showing the Dems behind in the House but rising fast in the last month.
Anonymous wrote:Senate is looking solid, 50-52 Dem is likely. With 51 the most probable. I’m way less confident the Dems can hold the house, it may be especially bad with all the gerrymandering.