Anonymous wrote:


Amazing why no one has ever come forward before now, if it’s so important and terrible.

Coincidentally, WaPo endorses his opponent.

Convenient.

Either the women are telling the truth and Roy Moore is lying, or Roy Moore is telling the truth and the women are lying. Evidently you believe that Roy Moore is telling the truth and the women are lying. Why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

This. I want proof that she voted for Trump or it didn't happen. Probly trying to give herself some cred.

Obviously. Nothing else to go on.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

This postmodern stuff about how nobody can really know anything about anything or anybody, and we all construct our own reality out of our own facts, used to be a liberal, Ivory Tower thing. When did the Republicans take it over?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Christian, I'm really appalled by all the excuses these so-called Christian people are coming up with, especially the ones using the Bible. I'm also disgusted how Christian leaders are silent on this issue, not about condemning Moore per se since they shouldn't make a comment on allegations, but about how these so called Christians are using the Bible to excuse this disgusting behavior. It's no wonder why so many Americans are turning away from Christian churches.

+1. No real Christian would excuse this behavior.

“No REAL Christian” would allow a war criminal to be a professor at Rutgers. Alas, we are. I’ll take Moore over your corrupt crew any day of the past 4 decades. 500,000 dead Syrians would also.

I'm not sure which professor at Rutgers you are referring to but I'm guessing the hiring official does not hang out on this board.

Whatever suits your political needs. 24/7. You should look it up now that you have become the Religious Right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

WaPo can get her to say anything. They hate Moore.
Apparently they had already endorsed the Democrat opponent.

I'm not sure why this would surprise you. Has the WaPo ever endorsed a candidate like Moore? I'm also not sure why it even matters, because I doubt the newspaper has many readers in AL.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

This. I want proof that she voted for Trump or it didn't happen. Probly trying to give herself some cred.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

WaPo can get her to say anything. They hate Moore.
Apparently they had already endorsed the Democrat opponent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Christian, I'm really appalled by all the excuses these so-called Christian people are coming up with, especially the ones using the Bible. I'm also disgusted how Christian leaders are silent on this issue, not about condemning Moore per se since they shouldn't make a comment on allegations, but about how these so called Christians are using the Bible to excuse this disgusting behavior. It's no wonder why so many Americans are turning away from Christian churches.

+1. No real Christian would excuse this behavior.

“No REAL Christian” would allow a war criminal to be a professor at Rutgers. Alas, we are. I’ll take Moore over your corrupt crew any day of the past 4 decades. 500,000 dead Syrians would also.

I'm not sure which professor at Rutgers you are referring to but I'm guessing the hiring official does not hang out on this board.

I don't know who that ^PP is referring to, either, but here's the difference.. Christians aren't supporting and excusing a war criminal by quoting the Bible, nor is that war criminal running for a political office. What corrupt crew are you referring to?

I guess we could just keep going.. "no real Christian would advocate raising taxes on the middle class but cutting taxes for the rich"... "no real Christian would advocate taking away funding to feed poor kids and elderly"... "no real Christian would excuse pedophilia using the Bible".

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

There will be Moore stories.

Um, all Democrats?

The primary accuser is a Trump voter.

Says she has a a Trunp voter. Unless you took her to the polls and watched her fill out her ballot, you’ve no clue

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Haven't seen everything on this story,
but is there a paper trail to the woman's allegations?

I'd think this would be important.

There are records showing the date the mother was in court and the location of the hearing, and there is a courthouse directory showing the location of his office down the hall from that courtroom. Two contemporaneous pieces of paper to corroborate the witness testimony.

i don't mean those records exist in theory. I mean the reporters tracked them down already and used them to verify the witness stories before publishing. They have already found the paper trail.

The two were in the same building? Ok. That's not a paper trail of anything, except they were in the same building. And that's it??

Amazing!

It is an amazing coincidence. And also an amazing coincidence that the mother and friends of the main accuser back up her story because she told them about it years ago. Did she have some kind of amazing soothsayer talent that she knew Moore would be running for office in 2017 and she was scheming to take him down already in 1979 when she was 14 and told her friends? How did she even know who Moore was back then?? Amazing.

Amazing why no one has ever come forward before now, if it’s so important and terrible.

Coincidentally, WaPo endorses his opponent.

Convenient.

This is the same Washington Post you loved a week ago, because they broke Donna Brazille and the primary was rigged on the eve of the VA election. They also broke email and leak scandals at inconvenient times for Dems last year. Their editorial board is liberal. They report news on both sides. Sorry this is bad for you. But the Donna Brazille stuff sucks for Democrats.

GOP: WE believe Democrats ran a child sex ring in the basement of a pizza parlor that had no basement.


Also GOP: We don't believe the major newspaper story with 30 SOURCES about a Republican pedophile.

Hardly anyone excuses his behavior and just about all prominent Republicans who have commented on this say that IF the report is true, Moore has no place in the senate and should withdraw.

The real question is whether it is true and what is more important when it comes to the election next month, whether Alabamans who vote will be believe the reports. I would wager that unless there is more that comes out on these stories, they will view it as a hatchet job by the WAPO and Moore will be elected.

What will carry weight in terms of Moore's claims that the story is fake is when he says that the WAPO actually endorsed his opponent so he will say they are in the tank for the Democrat and are trying to destroy him - and voters will believe him.

Certainly pedophilia is the point where the Republican Party draws a line in the sand and shows Moore the way to the door. Right? Because if they don’t, the Republican Party is broken.

Also, Moore may be on the ballots, but didn’t Murkowski lose a primary and win a write in campaign recently in Alaska? Alabama is very red. And 5 weeks is enough time to organize a writein campaign.

I am from the South, and I do not get this stand by our pedophilia mentality. Nope. Your dump Moore. Wage a write in campaign for a solid Republican candidate. And in Alabama, you stand a fighting chance.


Plus, you get to stop being the party of sex crimes and pedophilia, and become the party that took a risk to do the right thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Haven't seen everything on this story,
but is there a paper trail to the woman's allegations?

I'd think this would be important.

There are records showing the date the mother was in court and the location of the hearing, and there is a courthouse directory showing the location of his office down the hall from that courtroom. Two contemporaneous pieces of paper to corroborate the witness testimony.

i don't mean those records exist in theory. I mean the reporters tracked them down already and used them to verify the witness stories before publishing. They have already found the paper trail.

The two were in the same building? Ok. That's not a paper trail of anything, except they were in the same building. And that's it??

Amazing!

It is an amazing coincidence. And also an amazing coincidence that the mother and friends of the main accuser back up her story because she told them about it years ago. Did she have some kind of amazing soothsayer talent that she knew Moore would be running for office in 2017 and she was scheming to take him down already in 1979 when she was 14 and told her friends? How did she even know who Moore was back then?? Amazing.

Amazing why no one has ever come forward before now, if it’s so important and terrible.

Coincidentally, WaPo endorses his opponent.

Convenient.

Exactly. Why not a single peep before now?
His Democrat opponent is desperate. How sad.

They have "peeped" plenty - to their friends and family over the years. Just now, they're also peeping to the press. Sort of like the Weinstein and Spacey sex abuse scandals.

For those that want "proof" of Moore's pedophelia, I'm guessing more stuff will be unearthed before long. I doubt his tendencies evaporated overnight, there's probably stuff on his computer even.