Anonymous wrote:Found this summary of the last inspection:

"Work is incomplete and does not match approved plans. OK to install temporary weatherproofing to protect materials. While temporary weatherproofing may be installed; all weatherproofing must be removed prior to the next wind bracing inspection. Additional deficiencies have been identified. A Stop Work Order will be issued. Deficiencies Identified: 1. Foundation anchors missing in various locations throughout. 2. Not all fastening of sheathing complete. Some panels still loose. 3. Nail pattern incorrect at majority of braced wall panels throughout. 4. Interior braced walls not complete missing sheathing in various locations. 5. Header has not been installed at first floor front opening. 6. Strong wall panels not installed. 7. Opening layout has changed from approved plans. 8. Need to install blocking at seams of sheathing to fasten sheathing. 9. Unable to access upper floors and cannot verify wall to roof attachment or upper interior braced walls. 10. With respect to zoning compliance, based on the wall check survey prepared by Larry N. Scartz and dated October 29, 2025, the northwest corner of the addition is located only 7.4 feet from the northern side property line, where an 8-foot side yard setback is required for the R-3 Cluster District pursuant to Section 2102.6.B. of the Zoning Ordinance. "

Unable to access upper floors is good. This is how I built lego houses.

Found this summary of the last inspection:

"Work is incomplete and does not match approved plans. OK to install temporary weatherproofing to protect materials. While temporary weatherproofing may be installed; all weatherproofing must be removed prior to the next wind bracing inspection. Additional deficiencies have been identified. A Stop Work Order will be issued. Deficiencies Identified: 1. Foundation anchors missing in various locations throughout. 2. Not all fastening of sheathing complete. Some panels still loose. 3. Nail pattern incorrect at majority of braced wall panels throughout. 4. Interior braced walls not complete missing sheathing in various locations. 5. Header has not been installed at first floor front opening. 6. Strong wall panels not installed. 7. Opening layout has changed from approved plans. 8. Need to install blocking at seams of sheathing to fasten sheathing. 9. Unable to access upper floors and cannot verify wall to roof attachment or upper interior braced walls. 10. With respect to zoning compliance, based on the wall check survey prepared by Larry N. Scartz and dated October 29, 2025, the northwest corner of the addition is located only 7.4 feet from the northern side property line, where an 8-foot side yard setback is required for the R-3 Cluster District pursuant to Section 2102.6.B. of the Zoning Ordinance. "

Anonymous wrote:I love the smell of property rights in the morning

Virginia has a long history of being on the wrong side of property rights. The idea of telling other people what can and can't do runs deep there.

I love the smell of property rights in the morning

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

The houses are 15-20ft apart. That's unlikely.

Don’t the houses have to be a minimum of 16 feet apart since there’s a minimum setback of 8 feet on each side of the property line?

It looks like they're both built on the setback line.

At least part of the new addition is possibly over the setback line. The county is investigating the situation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

The houses are 15-20ft apart. That's unlikely.

Don’t the houses have to be a minimum of 16 feet apart since there’s a minimum setback of 8 feet on each side of the property line?

It looks like they're both built on the setback line.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

The houses are 15-20ft apart. That's unlikely.

Don’t the houses have to be a minimum of 16 feet apart since there’s a minimum setback of 8 feet on each side of the property line?

Anonymous wrote:30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

Isn't it a flat roof? Seems like the ice will just pile up, same for water.

Anonymous wrote:30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

The houses are 15-20ft apart. That's unlikely.

30 feet off ground, if ice storms as we have, couldn’t the ice hit the neighbor house? Or snow when it does the shift off roof slam onto neighbors house when slipping from that height?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you to the above poster who laid out the whole BZA process.

I do suspect that the homeowner is going to be very close (if not over) the 10% setback variance threshold.

A 10% threshold is 9.6 inches (10% of 96 inches) They are currently sitting at 6 inches short. An additional 3.5 inches more will be over 10%. Add in siding, gutters, roof line, etc it could easily go over the 10% threshold.

Gutters alone are 5 or 6 inches.

Standard gutters, yes. But you can get narrow gutters that are only a few inches wide.

I'm not sure if the county was already measuring to the current roof line. If so, they can probably squeak under 9.6 inches with special gutters. The siding isn't going to extend past the roof line.

Regarding gutter widths:

Mini Gutters (approx. 3 inches / 75mm): These are the narrowest option available and are generally used for small structures like sheds, greenhouses, summer houses, or bay windows. They are not intended for full-sized residential properties.

4-Inch Gutters: These are considered an outdated or narrow standard for modern homes. They are typically only sufficient for very small roofs in areas with light rainfall and are not recommended for most residential applications due to the risk of overflowing during heavy storms.

5-Inch Gutters: This is the most common and standard size for residential properties in the United States. They offer a good balance of capacity and affordability for average-sized homes in moderate climates.

Hope the owner doesn’t go with narrow gutters or the neighbor may have some overflow issues into their yard.

The neighbor is uphill.

Uphill doesn’t matter on gutter overflow

It's a fun thought exercise to see if you could use the height to your advantage to built up enough momentum to jump the property line. I'm not sure that would be legal, but it's possible the ordinances leave a loophole for it.

Simply running over the gutter wouldn't be enough, but if you picked up speed by dropping 10 feet you could probably get a decent distance.

More like 30 feet, it’s a 3 story addition

Sure, but there's an elevation difference between lots and you need some space for it to continue falling as it travels laterally. You'd probably only want a 10-15 foot drop before launching it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you to the above poster who laid out the whole BZA process.

I do suspect that the homeowner is going to be very close (if not over) the 10% setback variance threshold.

A 10% threshold is 9.6 inches (10% of 96 inches) They are currently sitting at 6 inches short. An additional 3.5 inches more will be over 10%. Add in siding, gutters, roof line, etc it could easily go over the 10% threshold.

Gutters alone are 5 or 6 inches.

Standard gutters, yes. But you can get narrow gutters that are only a few inches wide.

I'm not sure if the county was already measuring to the current roof line. If so, they can probably squeak under 9.6 inches with special gutters. The siding isn't going to extend past the roof line.

Regarding gutter widths:

Mini Gutters (approx. 3 inches / 75mm): These are the narrowest option available and are generally used for small structures like sheds, greenhouses, summer houses, or bay windows. They are not intended for full-sized residential properties.

4-Inch Gutters: These are considered an outdated or narrow standard for modern homes. They are typically only sufficient for very small roofs in areas with light rainfall and are not recommended for most residential applications due to the risk of overflowing during heavy storms.

5-Inch Gutters: This is the most common and standard size for residential properties in the United States. They offer a good balance of capacity and affordability for average-sized homes in moderate climates.

Hope the owner doesn’t go with narrow gutters or the neighbor may have some overflow issues into their yard.

The neighbor is uphill.

Uphill doesn’t matter on gutter overflow

It's a fun thought exercise to see if you could use the height to your advantage to built up enough momentum to jump the property line. I'm not sure that would be legal, but it's possible the ordinances leave a loophole for it.

Simply running over the gutter wouldn't be enough, but if you picked up speed by dropping 10 feet you could probably get a decent distance.

More like 30 feet, it’s a 3 story addition