Anonymous
10/16/2025 07:16
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
What does this have to do with Option D? What are your problems with it?
To be blunt, it has the highest FARMS rates for Woodward and WJ than the others. Woodward crosses the "20% tipping point" where the community is less served. We don't need another bad school
Moreover, it draws the map for areas that weren't meant to be included in the Woodward zone. By that I mean, current WJ has more development coming. Why push the limits to DCC more with this map? It will be a problem for WJ/Woodward espexially. County ignored this population boom in the rockville study for the elementary that became Bayard Rustin .
Agree with this. Also, Wheaton area has many illegals/undocumented who don't pay taxes but use our resources. To believe otherwise is just ignorant.
Anonymous
10/16/2025 07:04
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
What does this have to do with Option D? What are your problems with it?
To be blunt, it has the highest FARMS rates for Woodward and WJ than the others. Woodward crosses the "20% tipping point" where the community is less served. We don't need another bad school
Moreover, it draws the map for areas that weren't meant to be included in the Woodward zone. By that I mean, current WJ has more development coming. Why push the limits to DCC more with this map? It will be a problem for WJ/Woodward espexially. County ignored this population boom in the rockville study for the elementary that became Bayard Rustin .
Anonymous
10/16/2025 06:59
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
You need to educate yourself. Taxes are not fees. Where did you go to school?
I went to DCC schools. Grew up poor and poorly educated.
Anonymous
10/16/2025 06:49
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
What does this have to do with Option D? What are your problems with it?
Anonymous
10/16/2025 06:40
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
You need to educate yourself. Taxes are not fees. Where did you go to school?
To be fair to the PP, the county council has started talking about taxes like they’re fees to rationalize some of their big developer handouts. The PP isn’t getting that concept out of thin air.
MCPS is one school system. The programs available at every school need to be equivalent. If you want something different then pay for private.
Anonymous
10/16/2025 06:24
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
You need to educate yourself. Taxes are not fees. Where did you go to school?
Anonymous
10/16/2025 05:10
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
DCC and those who want option D take from those who pay more taxes (by virtue of being higher income you pay more tax), and claiming them as your own because your poor (yes, you and your neighbors don't make as much money... It's not just a lifestyle choice to live in a 1950s ranch or a 1960s era apt or next to MS13).
The county's own data clearly illustrates the poverty and thus lower income in the FARMS data for DCC. By virtue of being FARMS, at double and triple the rates of schools like WJ, BCC, Whitman, you inherently pay less income tax because your income is lower. Your landlords pay your property tax. Your personal share of that particular property tax is also lower because the property are worth less than those in WJ, etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zOiiclIJIYTpJu8QkeZtMYQ_ho2xGcx7/view
Anonymous
10/15/2025 20:40
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Simpletons ignore Montgomery County has income tax too. Pretend to yourself as if DCC generates more income tax revenue. It does not.
Some of us in the DCC make far more than WJ families, we just don't choose to live in the same way and save, save for college and make other lifestyle choices. Shocker. We pay more than our fair share in property, income and sales taxes.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 20:03
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
By clever and resourceful, PP means selfish and obnoxious.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 20:01
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
This has always been the plan. Woodward was for WJ.
The BOE should have written that down instead of approving a boundary study that includes the DCC. If you all want to hoard everyone else's tax dollars for yourselves, at least be honest about it.
Oh, I think the PP's comments were very honestly over-entitled.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 19:50
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Grow up, even FARMS families pay taxes.
Oh? If true... A much lower amount than me and other WJ families. That I can assure you
How many families do you think are equal in worth to your own family?
15%
Anonymous
10/15/2025 19:03
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Please elaborate. This should be fun.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 18:27
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
That's option D.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:52
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
By resourceful you mean good at taking resources meant for everyone and claiming them as your own
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:38
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Well this thread continues to be klassssssy