Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS’s depth is impressive. That said, schedule-wise, it doesn’t look like they will be tested until 11 or 12 games in.

The coach should retire and get some new blood. Like watching Bob Hope on the Tonight Show.

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS’s depth is impressive. That said, schedule-wise, it doesn’t look like they will be tested until 11 or 12 games in.

Anonymous wrote:Who is the SJC hater? I get the jealousy of their boys team, but what's the issue with the girls? No one is talking smack and over-stating their potential this year. What gives?

And it's hard to be 0-4 if you have only played 3 games. Troll accurately at least.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS over Collegiate 16-4

SSSAS is quite good. Collegiate lost commits to graduation.

SSSAS is missing their entire starting offense from last season to injury. Collegiate struggled all game getting out of their own defensive zone. Kudos to the ladies playing - Next Women Up!

Collegiate’s drop off really highlights how good their Florida commit was.

How is SSSAS missing their entire starting offense from last season and yet their draw girl and the twins still played? Which girl were actually missing?

Draw girl and one of the twins plays middie

Attack last season was the other twin, Mercer commit, W&M commit, and 2027 attacker who are all out, with the twin barely playing.

So semantics last year’s attack is out - if you want to include middies they are missing the Michigan commit as well.

This is why the performance of the current “attack” has been so impressive so far. Still to really be tested, but the ladies have been holding their own.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS over Collegiate 16-4

SSSAS is quite good. Collegiate lost commits to graduation.

SSSAS is missing their entire starting offense from last season to injury. Collegiate struggled all game getting out of their own defensive zone. Kudos to the ladies playing - Next Women Up!

Collegiate’s drop off really highlights how good their Florida commit was.

How is SSSAS missing their entire starting offense from last season and yet their draw girl and the twins still played? Which girl were actually missing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS over Collegiate 16-4

SSSAS is quite good. Collegiate lost commits to graduation.

SSSAS is missing their entire starting offense from last season to injury. Collegiate struggled all game getting out of their own defensive zone. Kudos to the ladies playing - Next Women Up!

Collegiate’s drop off really highlights how good their Florida commit was.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi playing without their ND and VTech committed players soooooo….

Someone already conclusively explained why injury whining is weak. But since you want a comparison, SJC played without 4 returning starters including 3 of their 4 defenders, and a key middle. So........

Was SJC missing their flop specialist?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi playing without their ND and VTech committed players soooooo….

Someone already conclusively explained why injury whining is weak. But since you want a comparison, SJC played without 4 returning starters including 3 of their 4 defenders, and a key middle. So........

Was SJC missing their flop specialist?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi playing without their ND and VTech committed players soooooo….

Someone already conclusively explained why injury whining is weak. But since you want a comparison, SJC played without 4 returning starters including 3 of their 4 defenders, and a key middle. So........

Anonymous wrote:It was a great game. Either team could have won and both sides gave maximum effort.

Anonymous wrote:Visi playing without their ND and VTech committed players soooooo….