Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Walls is a humanities high school and Basis is an academic.
You do know that humanities are part of academia and thus also academic, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis is a lottery admission school that starts at 5th grade and does not admit 9th graders. It's not a high school accessible to academic all stars from across the city.
Based on what we just experienced with Walls I’d say it’s the same. The words arbitrary and farcical come to mind
Anonymous wrote:Basis is a lottery admission school that starts at 5th grade and does not admit 9th graders. It's not a high school accessible to academic all stars from across the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some schools have no representation while others are overrepresented, which suggests that there aren’t school-specific quotas. It seems that teachers have the final say in the process, likely grouping students into tiers so that their top candidates are selected for interviews.
What's your source for this? Are you actually comparing number invited to middle school size, or you just guessing?
Not the PP you’re responding to but the Edscape school enrollment pathways data show this information. You can see which middle schools Walls students come from, and how many students specific middle schools send. PP is correct. Deal and Hardy consistently send a greater proportion of students than other middle schools. https://edscape.dc.gov/node/1640846
But my guess is they send a smaller proportion of kids who are even plausible candidates.
Circular argument. If Walls was admitting a quota from each middle school, as the PP suggested, the strongest applicants from each middle school would be plausible candidates by definition.
There’s just no direct or statistical evidence that Walls uses middle school quotas.
I don't know of any kids from my kid's school who have gotten an interview, my kid included. I know several applied.
Anonymous wrote:Walls is a humanities high school and Basis is an academic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This means that a student who’s academically brilliant might not get the same boost if they’re not seen as a natural “community player.” Teachers may have boosted kids who they thought would fit better into the community. I wouldn’t say it’s who they like better. They may have genuinely been answering the questions asked of them on the form. It’s not all academic.
(Re-posting to fix the quotes.)
A question for you - what public high school in DC is equipped to effectively educate the kids who are academically brilliant, but not natural "community players"?
As a taxpayer and parent, I want Walls to be that school. I want it to take the academically brilliant kids and build a community in which they can excel academically and in community with one another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This means that a student who’s academically brilliant might not get the same boost if they’re not seen as a natural “community player.” Teachers may have boosted kids who they thought would fit better into the community. I wouldn’t say it’s who they like better. They may have genuinely been answering the questions asked of them on the form. It’s not all academic.
A question for you - what public high school in DC is equipped to effectively educate the kids who are academically brilliant, but not natural "community players"?
As a taxpayer and parent, I want Walls to be that school. I want it to take the academically brilliant kids and build a community in which they can excel academically and in community with one another.
Basis
Anonymous wrote:This means that a student who’s academically brilliant might not get the same boost if they’re not seen as a natural “community player.” Teachers may have boosted kids who they thought would fit better into the community. I wouldn’t say it’s who they like better. They may have genuinely been answering the questions asked of them on the form. It’s not all academic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This means that a student who’s academically brilliant might not get the same boost if they’re not seen as a natural “community player.” Teachers may have boosted kids who they thought would fit better into the community. I wouldn’t say it’s who they like better. They may have genuinely been answering the questions asked of them on the form. It’s not all academic.
A question for you - what public high school in DC is equipped to effectively educate the kids who are academically brilliant, but not natural "community players"?
As a taxpayer and parent, I want Walls to be that school. I want it to take the academically brilliant kids and build a community in which they can excel academically and in community with one another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some schools have no representation while others are overrepresented, which suggests that there aren’t school-specific quotas. It seems that teachers have the final say in the process, likely grouping students into tiers so that their top candidates are selected for interviews.
What's your source for this? Are you actually comparing number invited to middle school size, or you just guessing?
Not the PP you’re responding to but the Edscape school enrollment pathways data show this information. You can see which middle schools Walls students come from, and how many students specific middle schools send. PP is correct. Deal and Hardy consistently send a greater proportion of students than other middle schools. https://edscape.dc.gov/node/1640846
But my guess is they send a smaller proportion of kids who are even plausible candidates.
Circular argument. If Walls was admitting a quota from each middle school, as the PP suggested, the strongest applicants from each middle school would be plausible candidates by definition.
There’s just no direct or statistical evidence that Walls uses middle school quotas.
Anonymous wrote: The children who were selected (or not) from our charter school for interview make no sense when it comes to academic apples to apples.
Anonymous wrote:Has there ever been a FOIA unified effort on SWW process? The children who were selected (or not) from our charter school for interview make no sense when it comes to academic apples to apples.