Not affiliated with any good team being discussed: no one locally has answer for GC zone. STAB looked like they not seen one this season. It’s something that needs many practices against, and not sure how you can replicate it in practice

Anonymous wrote:Very much enjoying all of the time GC seems to occupy in your minds.

No. STAB wasn’t missing anyone. GC is just that good and when they play clean and don’t get themselves into card trouble, that’s what you get from them.

Wrong on the first point. Correct on the second.

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know final of SJC and Collegiate ?

SJC won by a few

Anyone know final of SJC and Collegiate ?

Very much enjoying all of the time GC seems to occupy in your minds.

No. STAB wasn’t missing anyone. GC is just that good and when they play clean and don’t get themselves into card trouble, that’s what you get from them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC running clock on STAB

18-6 final, GC beats STAB.

That's impressive play by GC. STAB must have been having an off day - to only lose to Potomac by one and then 18-6 to GC?? GC is a great team but so is STAB. Wondering if they were down a player??

Potomac is not GC, not by a long shot.

STAB had multiple starters not at the game for various reasons, per a parent. Not an excuse, but they did have players not there.

Visi v SJC. SJC loses in overtime. Great, great game and good lacrosse played by both. Visi won, but they were equally matched.

Anonymous wrote:Any other scores from today?

Shocked to see the GC STAB score. Suspect STAB was missing more than one starters?

Exhausted from playing Potomac

Any other scores from today?

Shocked to see the GC STAB score. Suspect STAB was missing more than one starters?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC over SR today. GC with the stall for 8 minutes and scored with 1 second left.

GC with 4 cards and played down a player for whole 4th quarter. NW commit carded out.

Don’t think they would’ve stalled otherwise.

Of course they would have

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR only got into the game because GC got into card trouble. It was not a close game until then.

They only scored twice after the second yellow card

After the second yellow on NW commit, yes. But GC had 4 cards total and SR scored 8 goals during those 4 yellows combined by my count.

Maybe GC should work on playing cleaner - just a suggestion.

I’m sure they’ll heed your advice

Maybe they should - sounds like they're using cards as an excuse for getting scored on

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR only got into the game because GC got into card trouble. It was not a close game until then.

They only scored twice after the second yellow card

After the second yellow on NW commit, yes. But GC had 4 cards total and SR scored 8 goals during those 4 yellows combined by my count.

Maybe GC should work on playing cleaner - just a suggestion.

I’m sure they’ll heed your advice

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC running clock on STAB

18-6 final, GC beats STAB.

That's impressive play by GC. STAB must have been having an off day - to only lose to Potomac by one and then 18-6 to GC?? GC is a great team but so is STAB. Wondering if they were down a player??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR only got into the game because GC got into card trouble. It was not a close game until then.

They only scored twice after the second yellow card

After the second yellow on NW commit, yes. But GC had 4 cards total and SR scored 8 goals during those 4 yellows combined by my count.

Maybe GC should work on playing cleaner - just a suggestion.