Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HUH?

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Biden Justice Department to produce a copy of a search warrant executed at his Mar-a-Lago estate, where the FBI conducted a nine-hour-plus search on Monday.

Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ordered the DOJ to “file a Response to the Motion to Unseal” the warrant after requests were made by the Times-Union, a newspaper located in Albany, N.Y., as well as the conservative legal group Judicial Watch.

The judge said that the DOJ must respond no later than Aug. 15, reports said.

Show source or I'm reporting.

Anonymous wrote:HUH?

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Biden Justice Department to produce a copy of a search warrant executed at his Mar-a-Lago estate, where the FBI conducted a nine-hour-plus search on Monday.

Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ordered the DOJ to “file a Response to the Motion to Unseal” the warrant after requests were made by the Times-Union, a newspaper located in Albany, N.Y., as well as the conservative legal group Judicial Watch.

The judge said that the DOJ must respond no later than Aug. 15, reports said.

Anonymous wrote:HUH?

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Biden Justice Department to produce a copy of a search warrant executed at his Mar-a-Lago estate, where the FBI conducted a nine-hour-plus search on Monday.

Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart ordered the DOJ to “file a Response to the Motion to Unseal” the warrant after requests were made by the Times-Union, a newspaper located in Albany, N.Y., as well as the conservative legal group Judicial Watch.

The judge said that the DOJ must respond no later than Aug. 15, reports said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI was required to provide a receipt for the inventory of siezed materials. Why isn’t every Democrat in Congress demanding that this be released by TFG?

Please share a reputable source claiming this.

Claiming what? That the FBI has to leave a receipt? That's the law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41

Are you saying they should demand Trump release it or it should be released without his consent? I asked for a source because I thought you meant that the FBI didn't give Trump release a receipt of seized material. Trump's lawyer confirmed they took boxes.

NP, but the sentence above obviously saying that they should demand Trump release it. He has the receipt.

No, it didn't clearly state that. "Every Democrat in Congress should be demanding that Trump release the FBI warrant and receipt of seized materials," is clear.

The only difference between what you wrote and the quote above is that the one above is in the passive voice. Maybe you don't know that "TFG" is slang for Trump?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI was required to provide a receipt for the inventory of siezed materials. Why isn’t every Democrat in Congress demanding that this be released by TFG?

Please share a reputable source claiming this.

Claiming what? That the FBI has to leave a receipt? That's the law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41

Are you saying they should demand Trump release it or it should be released without his consent? I asked for a source because I thought you meant that the FBI didn't give Trump release a receipt of seized material. Trump's lawyer confirmed they took boxes.

NP, but the sentence above obviously saying that they should demand Trump release it. He has the receipt.

No, it didn't clearly state that. "Every Democrat in Congress should be demanding that Trump release the FBI warrant and receipt of seized materials," is clear.

I'm sorry but I have to laugh at you somehow making it Democrats' fault that Trump hasn't released the warrant. It is our fault he forgot to wipe himself after pooping today, too? Did we force him to commit all his crimes on top of that?

The guy does what he wants to do, always has and always will. Ask the couple dozen women who've credibly accused him. He is who he is, and who he is is the kind of guy who steals classified documents, for gd knows what but certainly not to save the world, and buries his first wife and the mother of his kids in a golf course to save a few dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

You mean like how Trump tried to weaponize the DoJ to go after his political opponents... HRC, Biden?

Trump broke his own law - mishandling of classified docs. More fool him.

Why don't republicans think things through before they pass these laws?

Karma. It's what's for dinner.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI was required to provide a receipt for the inventory of siezed materials. Why isn’t every Democrat in Congress demanding that this be released by TFG?

Please share a reputable source claiming this.

Claiming what? That the FBI has to leave a receipt? That's the law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41

Are you saying they should demand Trump release it or it should be released without his consent? I asked for a source because I thought you meant that the FBI didn't give Trump release a receipt of seized material. Trump's lawyer confirmed they took boxes.

NP, but the sentence above obviously saying that they should demand Trump release it. He has the receipt.

No, it didn't clearly state that. "Every Democrat in Congress should be demanding that Trump release the FBI warrant and receipt of seized materials," is clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI was required to provide a receipt for the inventory of siezed materials. Why isn’t every Democrat in Congress demanding that this be released by TFG?

Please share a reputable source claiming this.

Claiming what? That the FBI has to leave a receipt? That's the law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_41

Are you saying they should demand Trump release it or it should be released without his consent? I asked for a source because I thought you meant that the FBI didn't give Trump release a receipt of seized material. Trump's lawyer confirmed they took boxes.

NP, but the sentence above obviously saying that they should demand Trump release it. He has the receipt.

No, it didn't clearly state that. "Every Democrat in Congress should be demanding that Trump release the FBI warrant and receipt of seized materials," is clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

You mean like how Trump tried to weaponize the DoJ to go after his political opponents... HRC, Biden?

Trump broke his own law - mishandling of classified docs. More fool him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

You mean like how Trump tried to weaponize the DoJ to go after his political opponents... HRC, Biden?

Trump broke his own law - mishandling of classified docs. More fool him.

Anonymous wrote:
The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm what changed?

The rhetoric is so dangerous. The FBI is coming for you. Desantis called it a regime and said we’re in a banana republic. They are stoking violence.

Oh, please.
After weeks of obnoxious protests outside the homes of SCOTUS justices, don't talk about "rhetoric."

The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm what changed?

The rhetoric is so dangerous. The FBI is coming for you. Desantis called it a regime and said we’re in a banana republic. They are stoking violence.

Oh, please.
After weeks of obnoxious protests outside the homes of SCOTUS justices, don't talk about "rhetoric."

The dangerous thing here is the DOJ being weaponized against political opponents.

Anonymous wrote:

Presumably this is the reason TFG is legally barred from releasing the warrant and itemization of documents siezed.

Says who? He can release the warrant.