Anonymous wrote:Has anyone’s child gotten in with a nnat score of 106?
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone’s child gotten in with a nnat score of 106?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi - I am trying to make sense of my DS's rejection for AAP. I submitted an application for my 2nd grader who is currently attending a private school (he was in FCPS for 1st grade, we moved him for 2nd). WISC score was a 126, 4 COs on the GBRS, top of the class grades for the last 2 years or report cards that we submitted. The teacher wrote in the recommendation letter that he is currently excelling at 3-5th grade level of schoolwork in all subjects, not just math and that he is naturally curious, loves learning and is emotionally mature when interacting with his peers. I am assuming that I used poor work examples from his classwork and that the parent letter I submitted worked against him somehow? I'm confused and at a loss. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Did he get good score for NNAT in 1st grade? His WISC is good but not 130. WISC 130 = 98 percentile.
He got a 119 on the 1st grade test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi - I am trying to make sense of my DS's rejection for AAP. I submitted an application for my 2nd grader who is currently attending a private school (he was in FCPS for 1st grade, we moved him for 2nd). WISC score was a 126, 4 COs on the GBRS, top of the class grades for the last 2 years or report cards that we submitted. The teacher wrote in the recommendation letter that he is currently excelling at 3-5th grade level of schoolwork in all subjects, not just math and that he is naturally curious, loves learning and is emotionally mature when interacting with his peers. I am assuming that I used poor work examples from his classwork and that the parent letter I submitted worked against him somehow? I'm confused and at a loss. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Did he get good score for NNAT in 1st grade? His WISC is good but not 130. WISC 130 = 98 percentile.
He got a 119 on the 1st grade test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi - I am trying to make sense of my DS's rejection for AAP. I submitted an application for my 2nd grader who is currently attending a private school (he was in FCPS for 1st grade, we moved him for 2nd). WISC score was a 126, 4 COs on the GBRS, top of the class grades for the last 2 years or report cards that we submitted. The teacher wrote in the recommendation letter that he is currently excelling at 3-5th grade level of schoolwork in all subjects, not just math and that he is naturally curious, loves learning and is emotionally mature when interacting with his peers. I am assuming that I used poor work examples from his classwork and that the parent letter I submitted worked against him somehow? I'm confused and at a loss. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Did he get good score for NNAT in 1st grade? His WISC is good but not 130. WISC 130 = 98 percentile.
Anonymous wrote:Hi - I am trying to make sense of my DS's rejection for AAP. I submitted an application for my 2nd grader who is currently attending a private school (he was in FCPS for 1st grade, we moved him for 2nd). WISC score was a 126, 4 COs on the GBRS, top of the class grades for the last 2 years or report cards that we submitted. The teacher wrote in the recommendation letter that he is currently excelling at 3-5th grade level of schoolwork in all subjects, not just math and that he is naturally curious, loves learning and is emotionally mature when interacting with his peers. I am assuming that I used poor work examples from his classwork and that the parent letter I submitted worked against him somehow? I'm confused and at a loss. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think one piece of the admissions puzzle everyone is missing here is the fact that the committee wants to see how/why your child "Needs" to be in AAP. My understanding is many parents write narratives that only talk about how great their kid is. They want to know why you child will not do as well if they stay in general education. Perhaps some of the children with lower test scores have parents who wrote referrals clearly explaining this -- with concrete examples. It's not just all about high performance, it's also about justifying *why* your kid needs AAP to succeed.
I agree 100%. People seem to view the application as something that will be viewed objectively, rather than as something that a person with human feelings will read and be persuaded one way or the other by intangibles in the application. The whole thing is ridiculous, because acceptance is more about whether the parent knows how to present his/her child well and less about the child's actual merits. When I first applied for my oldest, I made the mistake of thinking that it was mostly about the scores, so I presented my child as a smart, good student rather than presenting her as a child who "needs AAP." She was rejected with a 97th percentile CogAT, 15 GBRS, and LII in math and language arts since K.
When I had to appeal for my DD, the AART gave me a lot of advice on what to include and what not to include in the letter. These were things like DON'T: Try to prove that your kid is smart, suggest your kid is bored in regular classes, suggest that the AAP committee or your child's teachers made a mistake, criticize anything about the process, compare your child to anyone else who got in. DO: Give concrete examples of how your child is being held back or denied opportunities in gen ed that your child needs, Give specific examples of why your child would thrive in AAP. My kid got in on appeals, so the advice must have been decent.
I'm betting that a decent number of the mystery rejections are from parents who are doing things on the "Don't do" list. The AART seemed to suggest that saying your kid is bored in school, coming across as arrogant or presumptive, or in any way criticizing your kid's teachers or the AAP process would irritate the reviewers and lead to almost certain rejection.
Oops, I did not get this advice and I included in my parent sheet "[Child] has been saying that second grade is boring." She still got accepted. Not saying it's a good idea to include that, but it's not an auto-reject... probably depends on what reviewer you get.
No parent should be writing anything, it should not be allowed. Ever. Just another way that many parents have gamed the AAP process.
Perhaps the reviewer read it more in the vein of "my child is bored and I am worried she is learning her love of learning and becoming depressed because of the lack of being challenged," rather than reading it as your kid just complaining second grade is too easy. There's nuance there, but it could definitely go either way. I was also ready to write about how bored my kid was, but then someone warned me against it and instead suggested I include information about how she needed AAP for her personality to blossom, etc. It worked for us. But also.. yeah, she's crazy bored in second grade LOL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT : 150
Reports: all 4
GBRS: dont know but strong
Not in
Has anyone figured out any logic? What is the success of appeals? What can we do to make the appeal successful?
We are in a similar boat. We had NNAT of 150 and NOT IN.
I got the GBRS today and 2 sections showed "Frequently observed" and 2 sections as "Occasionally observed".
Not sure what it means. Can someone please explain GBRS based on it?
Not In
NNAT 149
If GBRS has "Occasionally Observed" - can we discuss with teacher or AART to upgrade GBRS or can anything else be done - so it will have less impact when we Appeal?
They are based on teacher observations. 2 Occasionally Observed is unfortunately your kiss of death[u]. There shouldnt be any--from what i can tell.
Anonymous wrote:
There are other posters who will tell you that their 140+ or 135+ IQ DC is being well served by the AAP program (including my older DC, fwiw). I'm not sure I'd take that I'd take that post as gospel. Experiences vary.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, almost everyone in AAP scored 97% or higher on COGAT
Anonymous wrote:
Isn't a 97% COGAT a relatively mediocre score compared to those in the AAP pool? Was it 97% local or national?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think one piece of the admissions puzzle everyone is missing here is the fact that the committee wants to see how/why your child "Needs" to be in AAP. My understanding is many parents write narratives that only talk about how great their kid is. They want to know why you child will not do as well if they stay in general education. Perhaps some of the children with lower test scores have parents who wrote referrals clearly explaining this -- with concrete examples. It's not just all about high performance, it's also about justifying *why* your kid needs AAP to succeed.
I agree 100%. People seem to view the application as something that will be viewed objectively, rather than as something that a person with human feelings will read and be persuaded one way or the other by intangibles in the application. The whole thing is ridiculous, because acceptance is more about whether the parent knows how to present his/her child well and less about the child's actual merits. When I first applied for my oldest, I made the mistake of thinking that it was mostly about the scores, so I presented my child as a smart, good student rather than presenting her as a child who "needs AAP." She was rejected with a 97th percentile CogAT, 15 GBRS, and LII in math and language arts since K.
When I had to appeal for my DD, the AART gave me a lot of advice on what to include and what not to include in the letter. These were things like DON'T: Try to prove that your kid is smart, suggest your kid is bored in regular classes, suggest that the AAP committee or your child's teachers made a mistake, criticize anything about the process, compare your child to anyone else who got in. DO: Give concrete examples of how your child is being held back or denied opportunities in gen ed that your child needs, Give specific examples of why your child would thrive in AAP. My kid got in on appeals, so the advice must have been decent.
I'm betting that a decent number of the mystery rejections are from parents who are doing things on the "Don't do" list. The AART seemed to suggest that saying your kid is bored in school, coming across as arrogant or presumptive, or in any way criticizing your kid's teachers or the AAP process would irritate the reviewers and lead to almost certain rejection.
Isn't a 97% COGAT a relatively mediocre score compared to those in the AAP pool? Was it 97% local or national?