Anonymous wrote:
In 2015, Senator Schumer Criticized The Practice Of Tying Immigration Reform To A Funding Bill Saying Congress Should "Not Hold Hostage The Funding Of The Department Of Homeland Security That Keeps Us Safe Over An Unrelated Fight On Immigration." SENATOR CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): "We would welcome a debate on immigration policies. Leader McConnell, he runs the Senate, He can start a debate on immigration on the floor, and in the -- on the floor of the Senate with the snap of his fingers. Let's vote on a clean bill. And then Senator McConnell, being the leader of the Senate, can put an immigration bill on the floor of the Senate. And we welcome that debate. We think we have the high ground on that debate. But we're not going to do it with a gun held to the head of the American people and say, you do this or we're going to shut down the government. Do not, we say to our Republican friends, do not hold hostage the funding of the Department of Homeland Security that keeps us safe over an unrelated fight on immigration." (Press Conference with Senators Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), 2/5/15)
Anonymous wrote:The shutdown is almost worth it just to toy with Trump's emotions. He can't tolerate staying in DC on the weekends.
For that alone, I give the Democrats props.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?
Why hasn’t the master “deal maker”offered something to the 15 Democrats they need?
He offered deals but stuck within 4 pillars and the Dims broke that by moving the goal post. We all know the Dims need these 800k voters for re-election and a path to citizenship is different than citizenship.
Your spelling is as good as your knowledge of events.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And don't worry about my "more constructive" things I could be doing, like just returning from Arlington to clean up the wreaths.
Good for you. BTW, this does not make you superior to anyone else on here.
Never said or alleged I was superior to anyone here. The problem with the left is they always resort to the "victim card" and frankly it's getting old.
Says the man who feels the need to brag about his charitable work in an unrelated discussion.
Says the man who was called out for his "pathetic life" and needed more "charitable" ways.
"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Liberal credo
Keep pretending. The DemocRATs blew it by letting illegal “Dreamers” force them into a shutdown. What a joke.
I just came from my kid’s hockey game, and ALL the Dads blame the DemocRATs and love how Trump is finally putting these people in their place. Even the couple who are fully shaven and NEVER have a mustache and goatee.
All the dads? What about the moms?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?
Why hasn’t the master “deal maker”offered something to the 15 Democrats they need?
He offered deals but stuck within 4 pillars and the Dims broke that by moving the goal post. We all know the Dims need these 800k voters for re-election and a path to citizenship is different than citizenship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?
Why hasn’t the master “deal maker”offered something to the 15 Democrats they need?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And don't worry about my "more constructive" things I could be doing, like just returning from Arlington to clean up the wreaths.
Good for you. BTW, this does not make you superior to anyone else on here.
Never said or alleged I was superior to anyone here. The problem with the left is they always resort to the "victim card" and frankly it's getting old.
Says the man who feels the need to brag about his charitable work in an unrelated discussion.
Says the man who was called out for his "pathetic life" and needed more "charitable" ways.
"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Liberal credo
Keep pretending. The DemocRATs blew it by letting illegal “Dreamers” force them into a shutdown. What a joke.
I just came from my kid’s hockey game, and ALL the Dads blame the DemocRATs and love how Trump is finally putting these people in their place. Even the couple who are fully shaven and NEVER have a mustache and goatee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?
Why hasn’t the master “deal maker”offered something to the 15 Democrats they need?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And don't worry about my "more constructive" things I could be doing, like just returning from Arlington to clean up the wreaths.
Good for you. BTW, this does not make you superior to anyone else on here.
Never said or alleged I was superior to anyone here. The problem with the left is they always resort to the "victim card" and frankly it's getting old.
Says the man who feels the need to brag about his charitable work in an unrelated discussion.
Says the man who was called out for his "pathetic life" and needed more "charitable" ways.
"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Liberal credo
Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?
Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the Dims trying to protect 800,000 dreamers or the Dims ignoring the other 325 million?