Anonymous
Post 10/13/2017 08:10     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.


Yes, they do. The group known for manipulating boundaries is already mobilized on social media.


And you think they're out to get you? Really?!?



Well, not me b/c I live close enough to W, that I won't be redistricted to S or K. However, I did watch the process unfold during the elementary process and I know how the system works. They were very $ucessful last time.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 23:42     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.


Yes, they do. The group known for manipulating boundaries is already mobilized on social media.


And you think they're out to get you? Really?!?

Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 23:10     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


No group is better than the others. They are all only interested in their self-interest and would gladly sell any opposing group down the river. Each will claim that they are acting in the best interests of everyone and that their farts are the sweetest smelling on earth. So, rip each other a new one while claiming you are political allies. There's nothing so interesting as watching a one party state disintegrate.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:57     Subject: Re:APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:It seems that DH and MM residents have chosen poorly. They need to get over the anger/bargaining stage and on to acceptance & hope.


Just acceptance. There is no hope.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:47     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.


Yes, they do. The group known for manipulating boundaries is already mobilized on social media.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:44     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.
.
+1 bingo! You save the newcomers the trouble of wading through 49 pages of mudslinging.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:40     Subject: Re:APS middle school boundary process
It seems that DH and MM residents have chosen poorly. They need to get over the anger/bargaining stage and on to acceptance & hope.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:17     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.


Judging from your syntax and vocabulary, I guess this comment came from Group 1, the poors!


I won’t even bother trying to educate you. You are a lost cause. Keep at it, skippy. Do tell us more about the “poors”.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:00     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.


Judging from your syntax and vocabulary, I guess this comment came from Group 1, the poors!
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 21:00     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:For what it's worth, I stopped fighting for putting a 4th comprehensive high school at Kenmore when I realized the FARMS percentages would put it at around 40% which I thought would be too high -- so better (I thought) for everyone to crowd into W-L and the Ed Center.

Of course, now my kids are being moved (maybe) to a Kenmore for middle with just that high FARMS rate or higher. I do t really know what to do, fight or not, but I HAVE stood up against ANYONE moving into a too-high FARMS situation in the past.



Ha! I knew it! I knew people suddenly wanted that bull shit career center option because of the west pike. Knew it!

Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 20:48     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


You don’t know what the f#ck you are talking about.
Truly your post is one of the most breathtakingly crap laden examples of low information commentary I have read on this thread.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 20:43     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Meant to say Group 1 (poors) and Group 2 (wealthy whites safe from FARMS) are attacking Group 3 (modestly affluent but not so much so to escape possibility of school with poors). Group 2- the wealthy whites are the worst of all 3 groups as they advocate to sacrifice Group 3’s kids to the poors.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 20:32     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
For what it's worth, I stopped fighting for putting a 4th comprehensive high school at Kenmore when I realized the FARMS percentages would put it at around 40% which I thought would be too high -- so better (I thought) for everyone to crowd into W-L and the Ed Center.

Of course, now my kids are being moved (maybe) to a Kenmore for middle with just that high FARMS rate or higher. I do t really know what to do, fight or not, but I HAVE stood up against ANYONE moving into a too-high FARMS situation in the past.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 20:27     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
I am in group 3 and would gladly allow my currently bused kid to be bused in the other direction to a better school. So there! I will bus my kid! I don't have to be convinced or cajoled.
Anonymous
Post 10/12/2017 20:27     Subject: APS middle school boundary process
Anonymous wrote:There are 3 competing groups here- 1) the poors who will do or say ansolutely anything so that their kids are not condemned to attending school with other poors, 2) the wealthy whites in North, North Arlington whose kids are safe for the time being from attending school with the poors and 3) modestly affluent families who have worked all of their lives in order to escape the poors, but who have not been quite successful enough to be able to buy in a neighborhood that is free of any risk of attending schools with the poors. Groups Nos 1 and 3 are attacking Group 2. Group 3 is the worst of all of these 3 groups bc they would behave precisely like Group 2 if they were in Group 2’s situation. They are happy to dispatch other people’s kids to high Farms schools, as long as it isnt their own kids.


I doubt there are many "poors" actually posting. They have neither the time nor the bandwidth to track and respond to a 40+ page thread on a school forum frequented by DC's elite.