Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:29
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Grow up, even FARMS families pay taxes.
Oh? If true... A much lower amount than me and other WJ families. That I can assure you
How many families do you think are equal in worth to your own family?
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:29
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Go lobby for your own new school. Clearly you are inept and were incapable. Us in the WJ area are far more clever and resourceful. Your only hope would be the govt granted lottery to maybe re zone you into Woodward or WJ. You want a handout . Standard FARMS DCC
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:27
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Seriously? Have you ever been to Silver Spring or Takoma Park?
Yes, they are dumps. With poor people who dont generate as much income and tax revenue as others.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:26
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Grow up, even FARMS families pay taxes.
Oh? If true... A much lower amount than me and other WJ families. That I can assure you
Anonymous
10/15/2025 17:24
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Simpletons ignore Montgomery County has income tax too. Pretend to yourself as if DCC generates more income tax revenue. It does not.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:44
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Grow up, even FARMS families pay taxes.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:35
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Pat O'neill hoarding resources for District 1 for her entire tenure is part of why we're here.
I mean, that's what she was elected to do, but it's a big part of the issue and it also made her clusters feel they were forever going to be entitled to suck up 50% of available MCPS funding in every CIP cycle.
Talk about entitlement.
I think you mean District 3? https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/boe/about/redistricting/
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:31
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
You're the one demanding to hoard a school paid for by 1 million people, ALL of whom pay taxes, for a community of 40000-60000. Yes, everyone pays property taxes either directly or indirectly.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:30
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Pat O'neill hoarding resources for District 1 for her entire tenure is part of why we're here.
I mean, that's what she was elected to do, but it's a big part of the issue and it also made her clusters feel they were forever going to be entitled to suck up 50% of available MCPS funding in every CIP cycle.
Talk about entitlement.
I mean, that's what she was elected to do, but it's a big part of the issue and it also made her clusters feel they were forever going to be entitled to suck up 50% of available MCPS funding in every CIP cycle.
Talk about entitlement.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:29
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still have yet to see a table showing housing in the pipeline for each school.
Where is the "buffer" for downtown Bethesda which is zoned for BCC? Just take a drive and see the development going up? It is lunacy to keep South Kensington at BCC.
Sorry BCC. You and DCC need to get your own new school built to solve your problem. Woodward is for WJ and you all are trying to hard to re-write history
MCPS serves all students in the county, not just in zip code 20814.
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:28
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).
Seriously? Have you ever been to Silver Spring or Takoma Park?
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:24
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still have yet to see a table showing housing in the pipeline for each school.
Where is the "buffer" for downtown Bethesda which is zoned for BCC? Just take a drive and see the development going up? It is lunacy to keep South Kensington at BCC.
Sorry BCC. You and DCC need to get your own new school built to solve your problem. Woodward is for WJ and you all are trying to hard to re-write history
You're counting on what the late Pat O'Neill said over a decade ago as some sort of eternal decree that will guide decisions here and now?
Oh Lord, may she rest in peace
Anonymous
10/15/2025 12:21
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still have yet to see a table showing housing in the pipeline for each school.
Where is the "buffer" for downtown Bethesda which is zoned for BCC? Just take a drive and see the development going up? It is lunacy to keep South Kensington at BCC.
Sorry BCC. You and DCC need to get your own new school built to solve your problem. Woodward is for WJ and you all are trying to hard to re-write history
You're counting on what the late Pat O'Neill said over a decade ago as some sort of eternal decree that will guide decisions here and now?
Anonymous
10/15/2025 11:58
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Still have yet to see a table showing housing in the pipeline for each school.
Where is the "buffer" for downtown Bethesda which is zoned for BCC? Just take a drive and see the development going up? It is lunacy to keep South Kensington at BCC.
Sorry BCC. You and DCC need to get your own new school built to solve your problem. Woodward is for WJ and you all are trying to hard to re-write history
Anonymous
10/15/2025 11:56
Subject: Second round options for Woodward boundary study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My order of preference from best to worst: B; A; C; D.
How about everyone else?
Option 1 from the initial options but moving Wheaton Woods to WJ or Woodward (ideally WJ)
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/boundarystudyoptions/home/woodward-initial-options
Use the current options. Which do you like in order for A-D
I don't really like any of them. I dislike D the least, followed by A, B and C which I dislike the most.
I prefer status quo too, but reality is change is coming. I dislike D the most. Why do you dislike it the least?
Because it doesn't leave 3 DCC schools overcrowded while WJ and Woodward are left 20% empty
Woodward is meant to solve WJ issues of over crowding. You need a buffer because very soon WJ and Woodward will be at capacity. The master plan has housing congregate on the Pike and throughout WJ. Just take a drive through and see the development going up. And maybe one day Lerner will put something at White Flint.
And it's silly to say DCC pays more taxes than the West side of the county, bc that's not true.
Option D is the worst
WJ taxpayers didn't pay for even half of Woodward. GMAFB and learn some basic math.
Show your math. And I don't mean Eureka place value discs and number bonds. Real math.
WJ definitely paid for Woodward. Not the DCC and many of whom don't pay any tax and most of whom receive benefits (see FARMS).