Anonymous wrote:
This is insane. What's next, a law requiring that every women's shelter have a convicted rapist on its board?
+1 I suppose they want to have a different perspective. Absurd.
Everyone has their lived experience and own truths.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if at the end of this, they pass a bill that reduces punishments and penalties for criminals even more?
I mean, after slipping in the item about the Sentencing Commission nominee now MUST be a criminal, who knows what other "adjustments" they have made? And then when Mendo chose not to identify any of the groups that had sought changes, doesn't seem to bode well.
The Council seem to have NO FEAR of consequences from dc voters which is striking.
The recall Allen effort has raised $60,000 in a very short time, that could get their attention if successful or close.
This is insane. What's next, a law requiring that every women's shelter have a convicted rapist on its board?
This is insane. What's next, a law requiring that every women's shelter have a convicted rapist on its board?
+1 I suppose they want to have a different perspective. Absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if at the end of this, they pass a bill that reduces punishments and penalties for criminals even more?
I mean, after slipping in the item about the Sentencing Commission nominee now MUST be a criminal, who knows what other "adjustments" they have made? And then when Mendo chose not to identify any of the groups that had sought changes, doesn't seem to bode well.
The Council seem to have NO FEAR of consequences from dc voters which is striking.
The recall Allen effort has raised $60,000 in a very short time, that could get their attention if successful or close.
This is insane. What's next, a law requiring that every women's shelter have a convicted rapist on its board?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if at the end of this, they pass a bill that reduces punishments and penalties for criminals even more?
I mean, after slipping in the item about the Sentencing Commission nominee now MUST be a criminal, who knows what other "adjustments" they have made? And then when Mendo chose not to identify any of the groups that had sought changes, doesn't seem to bode well.
The Council seem to have NO FEAR of consequences from dc voters which is striking.
The recall Allen effort has raised $60,000 in a very short time, that could get their attention if successful or close.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if at the end of this, they pass a bill that reduces punishments and penalties for criminals even more?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the response to this was to REQUIRE a criminal to be appointed, by law, in a public SAFETY bill. The Commission provides technical guidance to judges, it is made up of judges, lawyers and academics. No one on the commission represents a victim advocacy group. Some on the Commission objected to his appointment in part due to his lack of relevant expertise. This is really pretty extraordinary at a time DC is making international news for crime. And shows the degree of capture by these groups, imo.
https://wtop. com/dc/2024/01/stop-this-revolving-door-us-attorney-pushes-back-on-dc-councils-sentencing-commission-nominee/
Do you think prisons are safe?
Anonymous wrote:So the response to this was to REQUIRE a criminal to be appointed, by law, in a public SAFETY bill. The Commission provides technical guidance to judges, it is made up of judges, lawyers and academics. No one on the commission represents a victim advocacy group. Some on the Commission objected to his appointment in part due to his lack of relevant expertise. This is really pretty extraordinary at a time DC is making international news for crime. And shows the degree of capture by these groups, imo.
https://wtop. com/dc/2024/01/stop-this-revolving-door-us-attorney-pushes-back-on-dc-councils-sentencing-commission-nominee/