Anonymous
10/19/2023 18:06
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Who are the serious democrats attached to the No Labels Party?
Because Penn/Jacobson and Leiberman are ...not Democrats and haven't been for more than a decade.
Why do you insist who is and who isn’t party of the party even when some are card holding members? It is such a bad look. So-and-so isn’t part of the party because this one time …. Clearly you are not interested in the Democrats winning an election as much as seeing your POV being the only POV. Anyone in the party who differs an inch from yours is dead to you.
Because what the loud mouth right and left wing nuts say is most important. Who cares what the other 95% think?
Anonymous
10/19/2023 17:57
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Who are the serious democrats attached to the No Labels Party?
Because Penn/Jacobson and Leiberman are ...not Democrats and haven't been for more than a decade.
Why do you insist who is and who isn’t party of the party even when some are card holding members? It is such a bad look. So-and-so isn’t part of the party because this one time …. Clearly you are not interested in the Democrats winning an election as much as seeing your POV being the only POV. Anyone in the party who differs an inch from yours is dead to you.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 11:16
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
They can't win because they have no candidate!! If they ran a can of beans against the awful RNC and DNC candidates, they'd peel some votes away but they have no can of beans in the race. Trump or Biden. Pick one.
Anonymous
10/18/2023 17:07
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:
There is no 3rd party threat to the RNC and DNC stranglehold on power in the US. We're 54 weeks away from election day 2024. Too late for a viable 3rd party candidate to emerge at this point. If Trump and Biden still have a pulse and Trump isn't jailed or disqualified, the choice for voters will be between Trump and Biden. Good times!
See? Commitment to the “both sides” trope at all costs! That’s paid shill discipline right there.
Anonymous
10/18/2023 16:06
Subject: "No Labels" Party
There is no 3rd party threat to the RNC and DNC stranglehold on power in the US. We're 54 weeks away from election day 2024. Too late for a viable 3rd party candidate to emerge at this point. If Trump and Biden still have a pulse and Trump isn't jailed or disqualified, the choice for voters will be between Trump and Biden. Good times!
Anonymous
10/18/2023 09:26
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No one is whining about “both sides” it is neither side and a new alternative.
Tiresome nonsense. It is not an alternative unless the phantom candidate could win and there is no mt even a theory about what states could deliver this possibility.
No labels equals a big load of crap.
Agree 100%. Without a candidate, they are a big load of crap. If they had a candidate, we may be having a different conversation depending on who that candidate is. If the RNC and DNC could figure out away to replace Trump and Biden with viable candidates, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
You’ve got incredible discipline in adhering to the BoThSiDeS talking point, I’ll give you that. Biden and Donnie are both old white men. That’s the end of the similarities.
Old men that are beyond the acceptable age threshold for starting a 4 year term as POTUS. This is basic common sense for 95% of Americans. Anyone who believes otherwise is discounting the important demands of the job or they're just not too bright.
Anonymous
10/18/2023 09:18
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No one is whining about “both sides” it is neither side and a new alternative.
Tiresome nonsense. It is not an alternative unless the phantom candidate could win and there is no mt even a theory about what states could deliver this possibility.
No labels equals a big load of crap.
Agree 100%. Without a candidate, they are a big load of crap. If they had a candidate, we may be having a different conversation depending on who that candidate is. If the RNC and DNC could figure out away to replace Trump and Biden with viable candidates, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
You’ve got incredible discipline in adhering to the BoThSiDeS talking point, I’ll give you that. Biden and Donnie are both old white men. That’s the end of the similarities.
Anonymous
10/18/2023 09:15
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No one is whining about “both sides” it is neither side and a new alternative.
Tiresome nonsense. It is not an alternative unless the phantom candidate could win and there is no mt even a theory about what states could deliver this possibility.
No labels equals a big load of crap.
Agree 100%. Without a candidate, they are a big load of crap. If they had a candidate, we may be having a different conversation depending on who that candidate is. If the RNC and DNC could figure out away to replace Trump and Biden with viable candidates, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Anonymous
10/17/2023 22:30
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Yes, of course this is possible. The fact that No labels has no candidate in the race at this point makes all of this conversation completely speculative. If No Labels put forth a well known candidate that has appeal to both moderate R & D voters, they'd have a chance to build momentum quickly but time is running out for that if it hasn't already. The bottom line- a majority of both R and D voters would like an alternative to Trump and Biden more so than in any election in modern history so the opportunity for a successful 3rd party candidate is in place more so than ever before. Without an announced candidate in place, we can only speculate on the intent of No Labels donors and whether or not their potential candidate would pull more votes from Trump or Biden.
it is really not difficult to figure this out. Trump has a snowball's chance in hell without shenanigans so shenanigans is what we will get. No labels will intend to pull votes from Biden.
I wish Trump had a snowballs chance in hell but polling data strongly suggests otherwise and we're in 2016 pre-election lala land if seriously thinking that is the case. No way to know how a strong 3rd party candidate would influence the race until there actually is a strong 3rd party candidate. As of now with the presumed choice being Trump or Biden, it's a toss up.
Totally disagree. They one hundred percent will choose the candidate they think will best influence the race for trump. They have zero intention of trying to win anything other than trump in the white house.
What is your evidence?
History. Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein. And I guess if you want to get real in the weeds, Perot. Without Perot Clinton wouldn’t have won.
I can’t tell if you faux hopeful people are really this dumb or if you’re just Republicans fully committed to getting a fascist dictatorship installed.
Just kidding. You’re obviously Republicans.
I mostly agree with you, except it’s a myth that Perot won the election for Clinton. Perot had 20% of the vote which was split equally between people who would have voted for Bush and people who would have voted for Clinton had he not been on the ballot. It’s actually a myth, started by Republicans who couldn’t believe they lost after twelve years, to blame the victory Clinton would have had without Perot on Perot.
Nope. My parents campaigned for Perot. The overwhelming majority of people they peeled off for Perot were Republicans.
Perhaps your parents were better at convincing Republicans. Despite your anecdote, there’s a lot of data to back this up.
https://www.pollingreport.com/hibbitts1202.htm
Anonymous
10/17/2023 22:24
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No one is whining about “both sides” it is neither side and a new alternative.
It is the GOP and it isn’t an alternative. It’s a spoiler.
Anonymous
10/17/2023 21:00
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No one is whining about “both sides” it is neither side and a new alternative.
Tiresome nonsense. It is not an alternative unless the phantom candidate could win and there is no mt even a theory about what states could deliver this possibility.
No labels equals a big load of crap.
Anonymous
10/17/2023 20:53
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Yes, of course this is possible. The fact that No labels has no candidate in the race at this point makes all of this conversation completely speculative. If No Labels put forth a well known candidate that has appeal to both moderate R & D voters, they'd have a chance to build momentum quickly but time is running out for that if it hasn't already. The bottom line- a majority of both R and D voters would like an alternative to Trump and Biden more so than in any election in modern history so the opportunity for a successful 3rd party candidate is in place more so than ever before. Without an announced candidate in place, we can only speculate on the intent of No Labels donors and whether or not their potential candidate would pull more votes from Trump or Biden.
it is really not difficult to figure this out. Trump has a snowball's chance in hell without shenanigans so shenanigans is what we will get. No labels will intend to pull votes from Biden.
I wish Trump had a snowballs chance in hell but polling data strongly suggests otherwise and we're in 2016 pre-election lala land if seriously thinking that is the case. No way to know how a strong 3rd party candidate would influence the race until there actually is a strong 3rd party candidate. As of now with the presumed choice being Trump or Biden, it's a toss up.
Totally disagree. They one hundred percent will choose the candidate they think will best influence the race for trump. They have zero intention of trying to win anything other than trump in the white house.
What is your evidence?
History. Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein. And I guess if you want to get real in the weeds, Perot. Without Perot Clinton wouldn’t have won.
I can’t tell if you faux hopeful people are really this dumb or if you’re just Republicans fully committed to getting a fascist dictatorship installed.
Just kidding. You’re obviously Republicans.
I mostly agree with you, except it’s a myth that Perot won the election for Clinton. Perot had 20% of the vote which was split equally between people who would have voted for Bush and people who would have voted for Clinton had he not been on the ballot. It’s actually a myth, started by Republicans who couldn’t believe they lost after twelve years, to blame the victory Clinton would have had without Perot on Perot.
Nope. My parents campaigned for Perot. The overwhelming majority of people they peeled off for Perot were Republicans.
Anonymous
10/17/2023 20:50
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Really? A viable alternative has a path to victory. What states are going to have no labels win the electoral college? A hypothetical "path to victory" will suffice. What is it?
You Trumpers and Bideners are so funny with all this wasted thought worrying about some entity that might be a political party yet they have never, ever actually had a candidate. Stop worrying; we will have the misfortune of a choice between the two 80 year old candidates and they'll have no competition. Aren't we so lucky!
So there is no actual path. No labels is full of BS and wants to just serve as a spoiler.
Yes, this is the case. They can whine about “both sides” all they want but they’re cheering for no labels solely for being a spoiler.
No Labels = no candidate! Are Trump and Biden so bad that they should be scared of a ghost candidate opponent?
I
Don’t think either campaign is scared of this, but “someone else” always polls better than an actual named person with a record, and third parties always poll better than they actually perform.
Anonymous
10/17/2023 20:48
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what's being posted here, the WH is definitely scarred and acknowledge how weak their position is
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/hillary-clinton-urges-joe-biden-not-to-sleep-on-third-party-spoilers
“Despite what’s being posted here”? Honestly, I fear for the children of tomorrow when the Republicans of today have reading comprehension like yours. Because I’m a Democrat - a real one, not a MoDeRaTe - and I’m the one who has twice posted “Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.” You know why? Because I understand that a spoiler doesn’t need to be huge in order to destroy progress. Too many people are way too stupid and will vote for Literally Any Corpse (R). To prevent fascism, to prevent the destruction of life as we know it, to prevent wars, we can’t afford to peel off votes for what is an obvious Kanye-for-President level BS gambit from the GOP.
Your hyperbole is getting tiresome. Time to take a chill pill and work toward achievable solutions rather than name calling, which is off-putting to those moderates and independents who the Dems need. I mean, you slam Dems because you think they aren’t true Dems or Dem enough. Keep it up though if you want people to vote 3rd party.
Voting no labels is voting for trump. Stop treating posters like fools.
They’re not dumb like they’re trying to pretend. They just have to troll that hard to try to hide their love for the GOP and all their sick policies.
Yes, yes, anyone who expresses a concern is a traitor.
I mean, why express concern when we are so fortunate to have a likely rematch of the two greatest presidential candidates in American history?
Whine and cry to all the voters that can't be bothered to vote in a primary. The solution is not billionaires coming in to try to manipulate things to their liking with third party stunt.
The solution certainly isn't hoping either party, one of them entirely lost to extremists and the other making alarming concessions to its own extremists, suddenly decides to correct its course and actually represent more moderate views. Many people are politically homeless. Deal with that instead of trying to browbeat anyone who dares question your Revolution. If Democrats need to hold onto my vote then return to moderate policies.
Vote for trump or vote for no labels. The effect is the same.
Maybe No Labels can ultimately throw its weight behind Democrats if Democrats can re-commit to being sensible rather than Revolutionary? Because if you keep doing what you're doing and simply insulting anyone who disagrees with you, you will also be voting for Trump because too many moderates can't endorse some of your policies.
No labels would only throw it's little weight to a Dem if that would help trump. What are you not understanding about no labels?
There is a real need for representation for moderates. No Labels has explanations other than dividing the vote.
Look how dogmatic you are... are you really prepared to work with people who want to consider things more carefully?
Narrator: it is a bunch of right wingers, funded by right wing billionaires, pretending to be moderate.
Let's not fall for it.
Yes, we can consider things more carefully, and in considering "no labels" - it is sham meant to split votes away from the Democrats in order to secure right wing fascism, so just own it for what it is.
No Labels has been around for a while. It looks to consist of a mix of disaffected DLC Democrats who have banded together with some Never Trumpers more recently. If you do not like the billionaires you assert without evidence are funding No Labels, then work at the grass roots level to find another candidate to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. The No Labels folks have agreed to go away if that happens.
Did you just show up to this long thread? There’s a ton of evidence throughout it and the links in it.
Since you apparently have spent time reviewing this thread, please provide one link with evidence showing that billionaires are behind No Labels and trying to elect Trump. Thanks in advance.
Why are you so uninterested in the thread in which you’re posting? Are you afraid of learning something if you read the whole thing? But here you go, lazy. https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow
Thanks. Crow donating a whopping $130,000 which is nothing by billionaire standards in either major political party. Here is what that looks like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/19/here-are-the-billionaires-who-donated-to-donald-trumps-2020-presidential-campaign/?sh=233614374667 Trump had 133 billionaires or their spouses backing him in 2020.
Plus, Crow, notwithstanding that he is apparently personal friends with a Supreme Court Justice appointed by a Republican, has made it clear that he is looking for a third party candidate not to reelect Trump:
In a statement to The New Republic, Crow said he supports No Labels because he believes that both parties have become too extreme. “America is in trouble if we keep going down the path of letting the two extremes dictate our politics,” Crow said in the statement. “I support No Labels because our government should be about what’s best for America, not what’s best for either political party. That’s also why I’ve supported candidates from both sides of the aisle who are willing to engage in civil discussions to move our country forward.”
The $130,000 is to a No Labels affiliated group that is disclosing its donors, but the actual No Labels is not and has hundreds of millions in dark money.
I have the list of donors and I've met with Nancy Jacobson. There are SEVERAL Trump donors on the list. Not just Crow. You cannot convince me that they would donate for any reason other than to get Trump elected. If it was just Crow, I would believe the story, but it isn't.
Isn't it possible that these so-called Trump donors have broken with him due to 1/6, multiple impeachments, his countless statements that have offended people, etc., and are looking for another candidate?
Of course plenty of republicans hate trump. What is not possible is that these folks actually believe that their third party candidate would win a presidential election. That is nonsense and they know it.
No one thought that Donald Trump could win either but he did once. Trump was covered on the entertainment pages well into the 2016 campaign by a respected news organization. Why exactly do you think it is impossible for No Labels to win? Especially since other posters are convinced that they have hundreds of millions in the bank, which would help getting on the ballot and in communications, etc.
Why dot you explain where these electoral college votes are going to materialize? Let's see that list.
You are missing the point. At this time during the 2016 cycle, (Oct. 2015), no one thought that Trump had a snowball's chance yet he won comfortably. Pollster Kellyann Conway was mocked even a week or so before the election when she explained Trump's numerous paths to victory. It is possible to change the electoral map.
You are missing the point. Do your best Kellyann and explain the no labels "path to victory".
I have not seen any polling. Keep in mind that we are more than a year out from the election. There are serious people from both major political parties attached to No Labels. If the major parties insist on running Biden and Trump, there will be a viable alternative.
Who are the serious democrats attached to the No Labels Party?
Because Penn/Jacobson and Leiberman are ...not Democrats and haven't been for more than a decade.