Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?

Seeing RWNJ accounts demanding to know if Elon has fired the 'CIA/FBI employees' at Twitter. There were no "CIA/FBI employees" at Twitter. They actually BELIEVED Taibbi's hyperbolic headline of "Twitter is an FBI subsidiary"

Had they actually read Taibbi's tweets beyond the salacious soundbite they'd know that this wasn't actually the case.

That hyperbolic headline was some straight-up irresponsible and dishonest "reporting" by Taibbi right there. That's the same kind of dishonest inciting bullshit like "stop the steal" that got people so riled that they attacked the US Capitol on January 6th.

There are a slew of former FBI/CIA employees at Twitter. There are the people we are talking about......
And, Facebook is even worse.

Thread:

So? People move from the government to corporations all the time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 7th installment is out. Says "EVERYTHING NY POST SAID WAS TRUE" - ehhh not necessarily, without context and specifics.

For example:
H BIDEN HAD FOREIGN BUSINESS DEALINGS!

Ehhh so what? So did Donald, so did Ivanka, so did Jared. Nothing about H Biden's business dealings was illegal.

THEY FALSELY CLAIMED THE LAPTOP WAS A HACK JOB!

Well do we *really* know what's true or false on that score? I don't. Chain of custody on the laptop is questionable and the laptop drive itself is super questionable as we know files on it were altered long after it was no longer in H Biden's possession.

And there are many other serious problems, for example the "corroborating proof" of the central "10 for the big guy" premise was even more sketchy and even more questionable, a photo of a cracked blackberry connected to a Russian cellphone provider showing a screenshot of what purports to be iphone text messages between H and Tony Bobulinski, who mysteriously had a $600k court judgement for fraud against him paid off just as he surfaced to "corroborate" the supposed "shady Biden dealings." Who bailed Bobulinski out from his legal problems? And does that 'who' happen to use that Russian cellphone provider?

The people who were recipients of the emails on the laptop have confirmed that they are authentic. Not ONE THING that has been revealed on the laptop has been proven to be fake. Not one.
Yes - the laptop is real and not a hack job.

And, what files on the laptop were altered? None.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?

Seeing RWNJ accounts demanding to know if Elon has fired the 'CIA/FBI employees' at Twitter. There were no "CIA/FBI employees" at Twitter. They actually BELIEVED Taibbi's hyperbolic headline of "Twitter is an FBI subsidiary"

Had they actually read Taibbi's tweets beyond the salacious soundbite they'd know that this wasn't actually the case.

That hyperbolic headline was some straight-up irresponsible and dishonest "reporting" by Taibbi right there. That's the same kind of dishonest inciting bullshit like "stop the steal" that got people so riled that they attacked the US Capitol on January 6th.

There are a slew of former FBI/CIA employees at Twitter. There are the people we are talking about......
And, Facebook is even worse.

Thread:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?

Seeing RWNJ accounts demanding to know if Elon has fired the 'CIA/FBI employees' at Twitter. There were no "CIA/FBI employees" at Twitter. They actually BELIEVED Taibbi's hyperbolic headline of "Twitter is an FBI subsidiary"

Had they actually read Taibbi's tweets beyond the salacious soundbite they'd know that this wasn't actually the case.

That hyperbolic headline was some straight-up irresponsible and dishonest "reporting" by Taibbi right there. That's the same kind of dishonest inciting bullshit like "stop the steal" that got people so riled that they attacked the US Capitol on January 6th.

Anonymous wrote:The 7th installment is out. Says "EVERYTHING NY POST SAID WAS TRUE" - ehhh not necessarily, without context and specifics.

For example:
H BIDEN HAD FOREIGN BUSINESS DEALINGS!

Ehhh so what? So did Donald, so did Ivanka, so did Jared. Nothing about H Biden's business dealings was illegal.

THEY FALSELY CLAIMED THE LAPTOP WAS A HACK JOB!

Well do we *really* know what's true or false on that score? I don't. Chain of custody on the laptop is questionable and the laptop drive itself is super questionable as we know files on it were altered long after it was no longer in H Biden's possession.

And there are many other serious problems, for example the "corroborating proof" of the central "10 for the big guy" premise was even more sketchy and even more questionable, a photo of a cracked blackberry connected to a Russian cellphone provider showing a screenshot of what purports to be iphone text messages between H and Tony Bobulinski, who mysteriously had a $600k court judgement for fraud against him paid off just as he surfaced to "corroborate" the supposed "shady Biden dealings." Who bailed Bobulinski out from his legal problems? And does that 'who' happen to use that Russian cellphone provider?

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I need a cliff notes of what these "Twitter Files" are. I have been living under a rock.

The first installment described the decision-making leading to blocking the New York Post story about Hunter's laptop. There were internal deliberations leading to a decision based on the belief that the laptop story violated Twitter's terms of service regarding hacked or stolen data.

The second , third, and fourth installments described the decision-making process leading to Trump being banned. Trump had repeatedly violated Twitter's terms of service but rules were changed to allow him to continue using Twitter. He reached the point of having only one remaining strike — meaning that one more violation would cause him to be banned — when January 6 came along. Twitter faced lots of pressure to ban him in the wake of the insurrection, but his subsequent tweets were not clear violations. Ultimately Twitter execs agreed that while no single tweet was a clear violation, taken as a whole they were sufficient to ban him and his account was suspended.

The subsequent installments were so not noteworthy that I can't even recall what they were about.

The basic pattern has been to promise huge revelations, spin normal procedures as somehow being signs of the apocalypse, and then wrap up saying that something that was not shown to be true was, in fact, true. Then have Musk and his fan boys run around claiming that Twitter was nothing more than a FBI front operation.

Anonymous wrote:I need a cliff notes of what these "Twitter Files" are. I have been living under a rock.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?

For what? They haven't exposed any criminality. Maybe they should be nominated for a comedy prize. Their overblown hype of "TwiTtEr iZ a SUbSidIaRy oF tHe fBi" was comically ludicrous.

Also: The only FBI involvement we heard about happened during the Trump administration. But sure, somehow that's Biden's fault.

"iT wUz tHE dEEp StATe"

Doesn’t exist:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/26/opinion/sunday/trump-civil-service-deep-state.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html

News flash: Career federal employees swear an oath to uphold the Constitution and uphold the law, and take annual ethics training They also follow their agencies' mission and strategic goals. As such they do in fact uphold the Constitution and the law, and resist Constitution-trampling chaos agents like Trump who try to dismantle the law and go against their agency mission and strategic goal.

It's called DOING THEIR JOBS. No "deep state cabal" required.

It's astounding that the right wing thinks the government should work like Game of Thrones, where everyone in the realm must bend the knee when the new king is crowned. It doesn't work that way. The constitution and the nation's laws are bigger than the President. No functioning democracy works that way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?

Seeing RWNJ accounts demanding to know if Elon has fired the 'CIA/FBI employees' at Twitter. There were no "CIA/FBI employees" at Twitter. They actually BELIEVED Taibbi's hyperbolic headline of "Twitter is an FBI subsidiary"

Had they actually read Taibbi's tweets beyond the salacious soundbite they'd know that this wasn't actually the case.

That hyperbolic headline was some straight-up irresponsible and dishonest "reporting" by Taibbi right there. That's the same kind of dishonest inciting bullshit like "stop the steal" that got people so riled that they attacked the US Capitol on January 6th.

Anonymous wrote:Pulitzer to Taibbi, Weiss, and others?