God this is spectacular.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was concerned about the phased in subsidies for childcare as we wouldn’t have qualified until youngest was almost school age as we’re at about 150% of median state income.
But I’m still sad. This country sucks. Guess they’re going to have to ban birth control too. Who in their right minds would have kids now?
So if having a kid qualify you for a handout, you see no point in having a kid at all. Nice logic.
You better hope robot AI is ready to care for you when you hit the nursing home.
I have three kids and we are doing fine. But raising kids is work and it was nice to see a year in which the US government acknowledged that. I guess it’s done now. I’m glad that we save and live lean.
I do not think the US will ne thriving anytime soon and certainly not with a Japan level birth rate. We do need young people to have kids.
![]()
If this is the best argument you can come up with you might as well just admit this bill was a bad idea. The US is in absolutely no danger of running out of people now or at any point in the foreseeable future.
If you can't afford to raise your own kids you shouldn't be having them. It isn't the job of the general public to pay for your kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was concerned about the phased in subsidies for childcare as we wouldn’t have qualified until youngest was almost school age as we’re at about 150% of median state income.
But I’m still sad. This country sucks. Guess they’re going to have to ban birth control too. Who in their right minds would have kids now?
So if having a kid qualify you for a handout, you see no point in having a kid at all. Nice logic.
You better hope robot AI is ready to care for you when you hit the nursing home.
I have three kids and we are doing fine. But raising kids is work and it was nice to see a year in which the US government acknowledged that. I guess it’s done now. I’m glad that we save and live lean.
I do not think the US will ne thriving anytime soon and certainly not with a Japan level birth rate. We do need young people to have kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was concerned about the phased in subsidies for childcare as we wouldn’t have qualified until youngest was almost school age as we’re at about 150% of median state income.
But I’m still sad. This country sucks. Guess they’re going to have to ban birth control too. Who in their right minds would have kids now?
So if having a kid qualify you for a handout, you see no point in having a kid at all. Nice logic.
Anonymous wrote:I was concerned about the phased in subsidies for childcare as we wouldn’t have qualified until youngest was almost school age as we’re at about 150% of median state income.
But I’m still sad. This country sucks. Guess they’re going to have to ban birth control too. Who in their right minds would have kids now?
Anonymous wrote:I was concerned about the phased in subsidies for childcare as we wouldn’t have qualified until youngest was almost school age as we’re at about 150% of median state income.
But I’m still sad. This country sucks. Guess they’re going to have to ban birth control too. Who in their right minds would have kids now?
Anonymous wrote:
2024. Pelosi already said she isn't stepping down on the House side. No idea what Schumer plans to do.