Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares what some random club in some random place is doing.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody advocating for biobanding here, not that there's anything wrong with that. FYI, the PP didn't mention college recruiting and college coaches actually told teams that they don't care what age group you are in. You just have to reach out to colleges to let them know you are interested. Close to every club is not forcing grade year on anyone.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Every league announcement said it wouldn't be perfect. Deal with it. There's no playing down unless it's biobanding. Not everyone cares about playing with their grade.
Fewer recruiters OR families are interested in B OR C teams. They get less experienced coaches and less support from there clubs. So, kids forced there will likely quit earlier. Being the youngest means that's more likely. This is why you give more choice and flexibility for parents and clubs.
So dumb just to think there's one path and to create loopholes for playing up.
In all of my years playing soccer and having kids who play soccer, I've never once met a kid who is interested in playing with a younger grade. I've certainly met plenty of kids who are interested in playing with a higher grade. What you are saying is nonsense and sounds ridiculous - just so you know.
You are correct.
The play down troll has been advocating for playing down a grade for over a year on this and other threads.
Unfortunately hes just going to need to experience SY and Aug birthdays playing with their grade before reality settles in. Even then he'll shop around looking for a loser club that will let him play his kid down. You're also correct in that college coaches will ignore the play downs when recruiting.
So many Aug-Dec are going to stay up on their current team and about 10-15 percent of kids don't match their schools start year and a bunch of Aug and Sept went to school on time. Overall, so many going to be off grade for the first 2-4 years that this grade thing isn't going to get noticed just like it isn't now under BY.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Every league announcement said it wouldn't be perfect. Deal with it. There's no playing down unless it's biobanding. Not everyone cares about playing with their grade.
Fewer recruiters OR families are interested in B OR C teams. They get less experienced coaches and less support from there clubs. So, kids forced there will likely quit earlier. Being the youngest means that's more likely. This is why you give more choice and flexibility for parents and clubs.
So dumb just to think there's one path and to create loopholes for playing up.
In all of my years playing soccer and having kids who play soccer, I've never once met a kid who is interested in playing with a younger grade. I've certainly met plenty of kids who are interested in playing with a higher grade. What you are saying is nonsense and sounds ridiculous - just so you know.
You are correct.
The play down troll has been advocating for playing down a grade for over a year on this and other threads.
Unfortunately hes just going to need to experience SY and Aug birthdays playing with their grade before reality settles in. Even then he'll shop around looking for a loser club that will let him play his kid down. You're also correct in that college coaches will ignore the play downs when recruiting.
Experience ... 5% of kids "played down" last time, averaging 1 per team. How states have different school start times means no matter what you do, you'll have this. You just choose to ignore it.
Also, people aren't advocating for anything, except for these kids to have flexibility to do what's best for them, because sometimes playing up to play on grade isn't a good idea.
Nobody advocating for biobanding here, not that there's anything wrong with that. FYI, the PP didn't mention college recruiting and college coaches actually told teams that they don't care what age group you are in. You just have to reach out to colleges to let them know you are interested. Close to every club is not forcing grade year on anyone.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Every league announcement said it wouldn't be perfect. Deal with it. There's no playing down unless it's biobanding. Not everyone cares about playing with their grade.
Fewer recruiters OR families are interested in B OR C teams. They get less experienced coaches and less support from there clubs. So, kids forced there will likely quit earlier. Being the youngest means that's more likely. This is why you give more choice and flexibility for parents and clubs.
So dumb just to think there's one path and to create loopholes for playing up.
In all of my years playing soccer and having kids who play soccer, I've never once met a kid who is interested in playing with a younger grade. I've certainly met plenty of kids who are interested in playing with a higher grade. What you are saying is nonsense and sounds ridiculous - just so you know.
You are correct.
The play down troll has been advocating for playing down a grade for over a year on this and other threads.
Unfortunately hes just going to need to experience SY and Aug birthdays playing with their grade before reality settles in. Even then he'll shop around looking for a loser club that will let him play his kid down. You're also correct in that college coaches will ignore the play downs when recruiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Every league announcement said it wouldn't be perfect. Deal with it. There's no playing down unless it's biobanding. Not everyone cares about playing with their grade.
Fewer recruiters OR families are interested in B OR C teams. They get less experienced coaches and less support from there clubs. So, kids forced there will likely quit earlier. Being the youngest means that's more likely. This is why you give more choice and flexibility for parents and clubs.
So dumb just to think there's one path and to create loopholes for playing up.
In all of my years playing soccer and having kids who play soccer, I've never once met a kid who is interested in playing with a younger grade. I've certainly met plenty of kids who are interested in playing with a higher grade. What you are saying is nonsense and sounds ridiculous - just so you know.
You are correct.
The play down troll has been advocating for playing down a grade for over a year on this and other threads.
Unfortunately hes just going to need to experience SY and Aug birthdays playing with their grade before reality settles in. Even then he'll shop around looking for a loser club that will let him play his kid down. You're also correct in that college coaches will ignore the play downs when recruiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stay tuned for the next version of this thread
Red Lights vs green lights. Do you stop on red or go based on your car
AugSep is the yellow light in your analogy.
Anonymous wrote:
Every league announcement said it wouldn't be perfect. Deal with it. There's no playing down unless it's biobanding. Not everyone cares about playing with their grade.
Fewer recruiters OR families are interested in B OR C teams. They get less experienced coaches and less support from there clubs. So, kids forced there will likely quit earlier. Being the youngest means that's more likely. This is why you give more choice and flexibility for parents and clubs.
So dumb just to think there's one path and to create loopholes for playing up.
In all of my years playing soccer and having kids who play soccer, I've never once met a kid who is interested in playing with a younger grade. I've certainly met plenty of kids who are interested in playing with a higher grade. What you are saying is nonsense and sounds ridiculous - just so you know.
Anonymous wrote:Stay tuned for the next version of this thread
Red Lights vs green lights. Do you stop on red or go based on your car
Anonymous wrote:What's the point of the club making a team based on school grade when the league goes by birth date?
To appease neurotic parents who aren't serious about soccer?
Because the "league" told everyone to play kids by school grade. Did anyone actually read the guidance on the age group change? What's your agenda on pushing kids down a grade - does it somehow benefit your kid? There is no circumstance where a kid playing a grade below is positive for player development or for recruiting (not to mention longevity in the sport). The only benefit for that might be for a kid who is smaller and needs the time to develop. By high school, any player playing down is wasting their time, and no recruiter is interested in a kid that can't even handle playing with their grade. Clubs know this even if dumb parents don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:"A: School grade may be considered as part of the evaluation, but the decision to allow a player to play up is ultimately based on technical criteria including the player’s skill, maturity, and readiness for the older age group. Grade alone does not guarantee that a player will play up."
This is boilerplate CYA language for when kids get pushed to a B team or C team because they aren't as good as the kids coming down. It's fine and to be expected. The language to focus on is "school grade may be considered".
Where does it say kids should play on grade whenever possible? Your reading into it.Anonymous wrote:That's a big lashing out after the table is already set for next year.
No league said to play by grade. ECNL and NCSL said the opposite. Almost always best to be youngest in age group, RAE. College said they recruit players and don't care what team or age group you are on.
Here is the guidance on the age group change from US Club, USYS and AYSO - specifically noting that the goal here is for kids to play by school grade whenever possible. I really don't know how much clearer it can be said without there being consequences for clubs that specifically hold kids down from playing on grade level. People really love to twist around the rationale here. If a kid is relying on being the best/biggest in their age group by avoiding playing up because of the Aug 1 cut-off, there won't be a single recruiter that will be impressed by that.
Why is the age group cut-off changing from January 1 (birth year ages)?
There are multiple reasons for this change. First, the Aug. 1 age group cut-off most effectively reduces the number of “trapped players” in youth soccer and reduces negative impacts on these players at multiple stages of their career. “Trapped” players are those who, due to soccer age group cut-offs, are in an older soccer age group than their school year. Trapped players have significantly reduced competition opportunities and disrupted training experiences in 8th grade (when most of their team is in high school) and are similarly negatively impacted four years later when players from the older soccer age group, but who are still in high school, are moved down into the same soccer age group. Second, an Aug. 1 age group cut-off best aligns soccer age groups with school year ages, maximizing the number of players who participate in soccer programs with their school-year friends. This alignment has a positive correlation with increased numbers of youth players entering and staying in the sport.
Why is Aug. 1 a better age group cut-off than Sept. 1?
Initially, US Club Soccer, US Youth Soccer and AYSO had determined to use a Sept. 1 age group cut-off instead of Aug. 1. After receiving significant feedback and identifying missing information in Department of Education school year cut-off lists, it has been determined that the Aug. 1 cut-off best reduces misalignment between age and school year. The Aug. 1 cut-off reduces not only the trapped player effect, but it also reduces the number of “force-ups,” a term referring to players in a younger soccer age group but older school year who must play up an age group in order to be with their school-year friends.