Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

Except some of the victims said they did have experiences with Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

Anonymous wrote:If you search "Trump" you get zero results.

If you search "Trump " you get over 600 hits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

What legal justification is there for removing Trump's and Sergey Brin's names? They only need to redact victims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.