Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:48     Subject: Epstein Files
“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:47     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.


I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.


So it’s fine that he raped girls and women because he didn’t enjoy it?! You didn’t even read the post that he was obsessed with her nipples.

WTAF.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:44     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.


I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:40     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:One thing that gets ignored is that if there were victims who "made deals" to not testify, then it would be almost impossible to have achieved a conviction. Prosecutors do not choose to prosecute if they won't succeed. It appears that may have been the case with the Acosta deal.

This is all very sad.


Did you watch the Netflix documentary? I don’t know all the details, but I don’t think it is the case that victims refused to testify. I truly believe it was that Acosta was compromised (implicitly or explicitly) and/or that they really did not believe that the crimes were that bad. This was still a period in time prior to me-too where shenanigans with a teen girl were naughty but not seen as criminal by many. It’d not hard to go from that mentality to believing that a jury would not convict.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:35     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:One thing that gets ignored is that if there were victims who "made deals" to not testify, then it would be almost impossible to have achieved a conviction. Prosecutors do not choose to prosecute if they won't succeed. It appears that may have been the case with the Acosta deal.

This is all very sad.


This is beyond naive, and I consider myself naive. C’mon. You know that the long arc doesn’t automatically band to justice. It never has, and never will because humans will always be corrupt, self-interested, and have blind spots and prejudices.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:35     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

Yup
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:34     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:One thing that gets ignored is that if there were victims who "made deals" to not testify, then it would be almost impossible to have achieved a conviction. Prosecutors do not choose to prosecute if they won't succeed. It appears that may have been the case with the Acosta deal.

This is all very sad.


Are those deals still enforceable or in effect now that Epstein is dead?
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:32     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.


That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b


Why would a photo of Ivanka be blacked out unless Trump trafficked her to Epstein and I would not bet against this!


They blacked out all minors. He has 2 daughters you dolt.


Are you not concerned about the fact that a pic if him with his daughter on a plane is in the Epstein files?
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:31     Subject: Epstein Files
Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:01     Subject: Epstein Files
SNL Donald Trump: “I’m inventing my own Hunger Games for high school athletes to compete. I thought, what’s the best way to distract from the Epstein Files? I know, invite a bunch of teenagers to my house. I’ll take things a pedophile might do for $1,000”
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:01     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:


He better be careful. This along with his anti-Israel sentiments, is going to get him the Venezuela treatment.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 09:01     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the smoking gun? There doesn’t appear to be any credible evidence of additional crimes by anyone on the list.


Well they have released a small fraction of the docs and are clearly carefully scrubbing Trump from each and every one, which is a smoking gun in itself.

For a guy that keeps telling the lie that he innocent he sure does sled a a lot of time having his name removed…and that’s in addition to the thousands of hours we know the FBI spent scrubbing his name.

Think about that, they had 1,000 agents working on it, still have to go through each file now, and are STILL missing references to Trump that they have to remove after release.

I think that we can safely assume that every black bar is covering up Donald J Pedo Trump. The man could not be more guilty.


So no smoking gun for Trump, Clinton, etc.?

DCUM has turned into conspiracy theory central.


So you just doubled down on stupid?
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 08:54     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 08:53     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the smoking gun? There doesn’t appear to be any credible evidence of additional crimes by anyone on the list.


Well they have released a small fraction of the docs and are clearly carefully scrubbing Trump from each and every one, which is a smoking gun in itself.

For a guy that keeps telling the lie that he innocent he sure does sled a a lot of time having his name removed…and that’s in addition to the thousands of hours we know the FBI spent scrubbing his name.

Think about that, they had 1,000 agents working on it, still have to go through each file now, and are STILL missing references to Trump that they have to remove after release.

I think that we can safely assume that every black bar is covering up Donald J Pedo Trump. The man could not be more guilty.


So no smoking gun for Trump, Clinton, etc.?

DCUM has turned into conspiracy theory central.
Anonymous
Post 12/21/2025 08:51     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
One thing that gets ignored is that if there were victims who "made deals" to not testify, then it would be almost impossible to have achieved a conviction. Prosecutors do not choose to prosecute if they won't succeed. It appears that may have been the case with the Acosta deal.

This is all very sad.