Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

HA! He was just glad the negative focus was on someone else. I am telling you, people like this care deeply about their public image, so much so that they are willing to try to taint others' - as in this case.Someone like this does not care one iota who gets thrown under the bus, as long as it is not him.

Of course he was monitoring it and of course he knew others were being accused. If he’s been repeatedly aggressive towards others, then this latest “apology” and “church” nonsense is all bs PR.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven’t read the entire thread. So someone may have already said this. Attorney here. I think he is acting on the advice of counsel and speaking from a script intended to minimize the consequences of his actions. They are likely looking for a deal of some kind where he agrees to anger management. I don’t know if jail time is a possibility for what he did. If it is, They are trying to avoid that. Trying to persuade the prosecutors to reduce the charge is also a possibility.

Grabbing papers out of someone’s hands in a threatening manner should not result in jail time absent some priors or political point being made.

Didn't he pin down one person with his bike? Assault with a deadly weapon.

Unlikely that the bike in this instance, especially starting from still would be considered a deadly weapon. The chances of serious injury in this instance are low. Most likely he'll get simple assault, although maybe more if the kid taking the video had more substantial injuries or his phone was damaged. Looks like he actually connected with that kid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

Nope he was going to "church" when he got pulled over. Then skipped church, went straight to his lawyer.

PP here and that's the part the bothers me the most. If he knew others were being accused and didn't immediately turn himself in at that point then his subsequent apology is worthless. Of course I don't know what he knew. And no he's not going to jail for thirty years nor should he.

I disagree. There is nothing wrong with talking to a lawyer before turning yourself in. You would be foolish not to. Honestly, I don’t see anything wrong with not turning yourself in period. There’s no obligation to do that and often that would be a very bad move.

As for going to the priest, you could just as easily be going there to seek penance and guidance for dealing with his problems as many more nefarious motive.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

HA! He was just glad the negative focus was on someone else. I am telling you, people like this care deeply about their public image, so much so that they are willing to try to taint others' - as in this case.Someone like this does not care one iota who gets thrown under the bus, as long as it is not him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

Nope he was going to "church" when he got pulled over. Then skipped church, went straight to his lawyer.

PP here and that's the part the bothers me the most. If he knew others were being accused and didn't immediately turn himself in at that point then his subsequent apology is worthless. Of course I don't know what he knew. And no he's not going to jail for thirty years nor should he.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

Nope he was going to "church" when he got pulled over. Then skipped church, went straight to his lawyer.

People,
This is montgomery county. He will not get jail time. He will likely get terms of a probation before judgement that includes therapy and community service.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine all the outrage if he had been black. Y’all definitely wouldn’t be pushing for just a slap on the wrist.

Not true for me. I’d say anger management and community service for a person of any background absent a recidivist.

DP.. maybe you would but many non black people would not. They would want him to face jail time.

I've been thinking about why some people are so quick to defend this guy.

I think some people see themselves in this guy, a non black person, and so they they defend him. They could maybe see themselves in this guy, and of course, would want people to not be so harsh. If he was black, they would probably be the first to claim he should get jail time since they have no idea what it is like to be a black man.

It's all about empathy and being able to see through the lens of a different person.

NP. I think it is worth engaging with this in the context of widespread calls for restorative justice and police abolition.

In a world in which not every "crime" deserves incarceration, what would we do with folks like this?

I beleive he should be punished. I also believe incarceration is wildly overutilized in the United States, and the PIC damages both jailer and jailee.

So, what do we do? Restorative justice? Make him apologize directly to his victims and hear about the damage of his actions? What does justice look like?

I wonder if he heard about others being falsely accused on social media. Did he go straight to the police and confess so that those being wrongly identified could have their names cleared?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so indicative of how there was a time in this country where we tried and executed witches.

The mob mentality runs high here. And we consider ourselves enlightened liberals.

Ask yourself why this hits home for you.

I doesn't hit home. Even I can recognize that this guy has not been charged or tried for anything yet. The people on this board behind their social media muscles would try and burn him (Yes I realize no witches were burned) and they would do it under the cover of 'woke' good tidings. I just think that if we cannot step back and enjoy the irony here, we are deluding ourselves.

I am allowed to think that he might not be a great person and that this crime might not rise to the level of imprisonment.

Anyway, enjoy watching the witch trial.

YET.

Key: Hide evidence in four different places, and after a few days, after other people have been implicated, run (don't walk) to your attorney, who will preach your carefully crafted narrative, including "remorse".

Nice guy. How many times do you think he has called the cops on his neighbors? What kind of imagination do you suspect this guy has, to cover his tracks, until now?

Hope he is paying through the nose for that attorney.

I caught the same details that you noticed, and the apparent conflict with the accused’s narrative. So you have that conflict + widespread attention on this case during a crisis that involves different treatment of people. Very curious how this one will turn out.

Anonymous wrote:Imagine all the outrage if he had been black. Y’all definitely wouldn’t be pushing for just a slap on the wrist.

Not true for me. I’d say anger management and community service for a person of any background absent a recidivist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so indicative of how there was a time in this country where we tried and executed witches.

The mob mentality runs high here. And we consider ourselves enlightened liberals.

Ask yourself why this hits home for you.

I doesn't hit home. Even I can recognize that this guy has not been charged or tried for anything yet. The people on this board behind their social media muscles would try and burn him (Yes I realize no witches were burned) and they would do it under the cover of 'woke' good tidings. I just think that if we cannot step back and enjoy the irony here, we are deluding ourselves.

I am allowed to think that he might not be a great person and that this crime might not rise to the level of imprisonment.

Anyway, enjoy watching the witch trial.

YET.

Key: Hide evidence in four different places, and after a few days, after other people have been implicated, run (don't walk) to your attorney, who will preach your carefully crafted narrative, including "remorse".

Nice guy. How many times do you think he has called the cops on his neighbors? What kind of imagination do you suspect this guy has, to cover his tracks, until now?

Hope he is paying through the nose for that attorney.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so indicative of how there was a time in this country where we tried and executed witches.

The mob mentality runs high here. And we consider ourselves enlightened liberals.

Ask yourself why this hits home for you.

I doesn't hit home. Even I can recognize that this guy has not been charged or tried for anything yet. The people on this board behind their social media muscles would try and burn him (Yes I realize no witches were burned) and they would do it under the cover of 'woke' good tidings. I just think that if we cannot step back and enjoy the irony here, we are deluding ourselves.

I am allowed to think that he might not be a great person and that this crime might not rise to the level of imprisonment.

Anyway, enjoy watching the witch trial.

Anonymous wrote:He will get a deal. Anger management plus lots of community hours and probation.

What he has to deal with on the civil side is another matter altogether.

+1