Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:no one at FCV gives a crap about MU. But there are a million mentions in this thread about FCV. It makes sense since FCV is better and have better players. But trying to tear down a club that has been so incredibly successful just shows so much jealousy.

This made me laugh out loud. The MU thread is the most active on this board. Obviously the FCV parents worry a lot about MU and have to come here to troll and then defend FCV when called out. Meanwhile every FCV thread is as quiet as their ID Sessions.

FCV parents that want people to stop tearing them down should stop trolling other team's threads. Simple.

+1

Truth

Anonymous wrote:no one at FCV gives a crap about MU. But there are a million mentions in this thread about FCV. It makes sense since FCV is better and have better players. But trying to tear down a club that has been so incredibly successful just shows so much jealousy.

This made me laugh out loud. The MU thread is the most active on this board. Obviously the FCV parents worry a lot about MU and have to come here to troll and then defend FCV when called out. Meanwhile every FCV thread is as quiet as their ID Sessions.

FCV parents that want people to stop tearing them down should stop trolling other team's threads. Simple.

Anonymous wrote:no one at FCV gives a crap about MU. But there are a million mentions in this thread about FCV. It makes sense since FCV is better and have better players. But trying to tear down a club that has been so incredibly successful just shows so much jealousy.

Lol is that why the cry baby “stop hating on FCV” thread was made?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No other da/ecnl club gives a crap about MU because they are all better than MU. Their parents get on here and try to create drama and rivalries. It’s more annoying than anything. Everybody gets a trophy.

Maybe look at the title of this thread for a moment?

Who did Washington Spirit VA get in their playoff draw?

Anonymous wrote:No other da/ecnl club gives a crap about MU because they are all better than MU. Their parents get on here and try to create drama and rivalries. It’s more annoying than anything. Everybody gets a trophy.

Maybe look at the title of this thread for a moment?

No other da/ecnl club gives a crap about MU because they are all better than MU. Their parents get on here and try to create drama and rivalries. It’s more annoying than anything. Everybody gets a trophy.

No one cares about St James FCV either. This just looks like information sharing to me.

Anonymous wrote:no one at FCV gives a crap about MU. But there are a million mentions in this thread about FCV. It makes sense since FCV is better and have better players. But trying to tear down a club that has been so incredibly successful just shows so much jealousy.

Success sometimes has a price. I have one DC at FCV and one who happily left for a place that was a better fit. It IS a pressure cooker. Some kids thrive on that and some don't. I suspect a lot of the hate and love on this board for FCV has to do with how your child fits in to the system....

no one at FCV gives a crap about MU. But there are a million mentions in this thread about FCV. It makes sense since FCV is better and have better players. But trying to tear down a club that has been so incredibly successful just shows so much jealousy.

FCV has always been willing to roster 20+. No new information here. They did it this year, if you'd been paying attention. What's hypocritical is MU defended the same practice this past fall (and laid into other MU/Spirit parents if they didn't tow the line). Whatever is convenient for the current narrative...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our team played FCV and I didn't see 21 girls on their bench. Looks more like 17 or 18. No dog in this fight but thought someone needed to be honest.

This year most FCV teams were capped at 18. Rosters for next year will be 21+. Unfortunate for players who will now not be rostered for games.

Another untruth. But nice try.

My guess is more players will be rostered -have to pay to play @ St. James for use of their facilities.

Too bad this is anonymous would love it if these idiots would have to put their names behind this nonsense. As has been said over and over, the FCV DA will train at the STJ rarely and the costs are staying exactly the same. Anyone telling you otherwise is just fantasizing and bitter that their situation is not what they want it to be for their DC.

Of course costs are staying the same this year because the deposits and the terms of the contracts were accepted before the sale was finalized and made public. Hard to jack the prices up afterword.

But you will see futsal prices increase and the location will be at the St James for the DA teams.

Things won't begin to migrate until late next spring. 2019-20 will be relatively the same for DA teams outside of futsal and and more and more winter training at the field house.

Late Spring and 2020-2021 is when DA will be pretty much at the St James.

Pricing structures will change starting in the 2020-2021 season likely to include lots of added gym extras that will be highly pushed to participate. They won't be "mandatory" but the pressure to do them will be high. By 2021 FCV's DA will become the most expensive elite soccer club in NoVA

Loudoun based NPL teams will remain in Loudoun utilizing Bles and the rest of the Evergreen leased fields while the DA is held at the St James. The club name will also be combined with the St James until after likely another year, 2022 "FCV" will no longer exist beyond NPL "United" teams.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our team played FCV and I didn't see 21 girls on their bench. Looks more like 17 or 18. No dog in this fight but thought someone needed to be honest.

This year most FCV teams were capped at 18. Rosters for next year will be 21+. Unfortunate for players who will now not be rostered for games.

Another untruth. But nice try.

My guess is more players will be rostered -have to pay to play @ St. James for use of their facilities.

Too bad this is anonymous would love it if these idiots would have to put their names behind this nonsense. As has been said over and over, the FCV DA will train at the STJ rarely and the costs are staying exactly the same. Anyone telling you otherwise is just fantasizing and bitter that their situation is not what they want it to be for their DC.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Oh Chris. Doesn't it get old to be this bitter all the time?

I only see Anonymous...how do people call others out on here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our team played FCV and I didn't see 21 girls on their bench. Looks more like 17 or 18. No dog in this fight but thought someone needed to be honest.

This year most FCV teams were capped at 18. Rosters for next year will be 21+. Unfortunate for players who will now not be rostered for games.

Another untruth. But nice try.

My guess is more players will be rostered -have to pay to play @ St. James for use of their facilities.

Too bad this is anonymous would love it if these idiots would have to put their names behind this nonsense. As has been said over and over, the FCV DA will train at the STJ rarely and the costs are staying exactly the same. Anyone telling you otherwise is just fantasizing and bitter that their situation is not what they want it to be for their DC.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Oh Chris. Doesn't it get old to be this bitter all the time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our team played FCV and I didn't see 21 girls on their bench. Looks more like 17 or 18. No dog in this fight but thought someone needed to be honest.

This year most FCV teams were capped at 18. Rosters for next year will be 21+. Unfortunate for players who will now not be rostered for games.

Another untruth. But nice try.

Very true, sorry to disappoint.
Rosters that were at 18 are now at 21+.
Just because you don’t want it to be true, doesn’t mean it isn’t.

Ok. Show us the age group where this is true. Come on big mouth.

Keep doubting. Once rosters are posted, you’ll see. Until then, just ask parents on the sidelines, they know.

I am one of the parents, maybe you aren't?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our team played FCV and I didn't see 21 girls on their bench. Looks more like 17 or 18. No dog in this fight but thought someone needed to be honest.

This year most FCV teams were capped at 18. Rosters for next year will be 21+. Unfortunate for players who will now not be rostered for games.

Another untruth. But nice try.

Very true, sorry to disappoint.
Rosters that were at 18 are now at 21+.
Just because you don’t want it to be true, doesn’t mean it isn’t.

Ok. Show us the age group where this is true. Come on big mouth.

Keep doubting. Once rosters are posted, you’ll see. Until then, just ask parents on the sidelines, they know.