Anonymous wrote:Next Level: I know families that really like the program.
In fact, my son tried out for NL. They cut him. (Ironically, he tried out for NL because we weren't sure he would make DC Express.)
A week or three after NL cuts, he was recruited to play for DCE.
He has since played for DCE for the last couple of years. He gets a ton or playing time and is loved by the coaches at his position. He has gone on to play well against the NL teams--he likes competing against them given the history. As a parent, I love the DCE program. Take a look how DCE puts their bags down at tourneys--enough said. A big focus on lax of course, but also character and grades. (No slight on NL, I'm sure they do same.)
Maybe he had a bad tryout with NL. Maybe it was something else. All I can say is, he has done very well at DCE even after NL had zero interest in him. In fact, I would say it is less about NL, then about how crappy tryouts are and how badly they are run in general. For example, we all talk about how important GB's are. How much time do you see spent at tryouts on 50-50 GB's?
That said, I have a feeling the ability to spot talent plays a role in why DCE has done so well of late.
The bag thing...do you mean that literally or is that a figure of speech?
Good points overall. I'm assuming your guy wasn't on one of the NL or BLC pre-8th grade club teams? It's tough for a player coming in sight unseen to a tryout to stand out for the reasons you stated. A kid can have an average-to-poor two day tryout and if that's all the coaches/evaluators have to go on, they'll tend to favor a known quantity (i.e. a kid who's already on the team where they can evaluate ability over one or more seasons, or someone they know from camps/clinics) over the new guy. It sucks but that's how it goes. Nice to hear he had a good tryout with DCE and caught on with them.