Anonymous wrote:

Typical

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Piers Morgan:
The only hookers in this story are the cheap, lazy journalists who ran with fake Trump sleaze to urinate on his presidency

Oh yes, Pierss Morgan, what a heavyweight, that is the problem with being a Trumpkins, only losers on your side.

What? Liberals loved him when he was here - especially for his gun control stance.

You liberals are a fickle bunch...or you have ADHD...I suspect both.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Piers Morgan:
The only hookers in this story are the cheap, lazy journalists who ran with fake Trump sleaze to urinate on his presidency

Oh yes, Pierss Morgan, what a heavyweight, that is the problem with being a Trumpkins, only losers on your side.

Anonymous wrote:Piers Morgan:
The only hookers in this story are the cheap, lazy journalists who ran with fake Trump sleaze to urinate on his presidency

Except we have a formal arrangement with NATO, like it or not. Don't sell them out when you owe the threatening country hundreds of millions of dollars.

Anonymous wrote:Here is Paul Wood:
One Russian specialist told me that Vladimir Putin himself sometimes says there is kompromat on him - though perhaps he is joking. The specialist went on to tell me that FSB officers are prone to boasting about having tapes on public figures, and to be careful of any statements they might make.
A former CIA officer told me he had spoken by phone to a serving FSB officer who talked about the tapes. He concluded: "It's hokey as hell."
Mr Trump and his supporters are right to point out that these are unsubstantiated allegations.
But it is not just sex, it is money too. The former MI6 agent's report detailed alleged attempts by the Kremlin to offer Mr Trump lucrative "sweetheart deals" in Russia that would buy his loyalty.
Mr Trump turned these down, and indeed has done little real business in Russia. But a joint intelligence and law enforcement taskforce has been looking at allegations that the Kremlin paid money to his campaign through his associates.

Still a nothingburger...

Anonymous wrote:The BBC report from Paul Wood was very specific and telling. This story has legs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, liberals are understanding the disclaimers that came with the publication of the dossier. How about mroe concerning is the timeline and circumstantial evidence against Trump and the Administration to be around the collusion with a foriegn state.

If you re going to say that it was ok for the Russians to hack the DNC and publish emails (as most Trump supporters have lauded) then this is ok too.

Please don't be a hypocrite.

All fake generated by the media. Have you no shame?

Except your fake news put your guy in the white house. If you buy this "fake news" then how do you explain that Trump now says there is no Russian money when his sone said 9 years ago there was disproprotionate Russian money in the TO deals? How do you explain the deference to Putin and the excoriaton of NATO by Trump? There is a lot to suggest these claims have at least some merit.

Don't waste your time. There is one maybe two Trumpkins who seemto have nothing better to do then post this fake news meme all day long.. They are either pad trolls or insane. In any case, best to just ignore.

Reality must be hard for you. Do you need to up your anti-depressants?

Oh a cute little concern troll.... anything to distract or deflect from bad news about dear leader.

Just like distracting from the real issue with #pissgate stories. Well done CNN/BuzzFeed...you've made the media almost irrelevant.