It also saves money for the County allowing for renovations because the cost is less than half the projected cost to build a new building. And it removes the need for expansions. It provides relief to Westfield and Oakton. It could provide relief to Chantilly and maybe SLHS. That means it is serving to help 4 large communities and save money.
Anonymous wrote:The GF people are smart enough to realize that merely objecting to the possibility of GF getting moved to Herndon isn't a winning strategy. So they've very sensibly framed their concerns in broader terms that appeal to people in other pyramids AND they've been more than willing to continue to do legwork on behalf of others even when the boundary consultant's recommendations didn't include moving anyone out of Langley. If they were your School Board representative or member of Congress you'd say they are very good at constituent service.
I would contrast that with the attitude of the those near KAA who, once they got wind of the KAA acquisition, have made it clear they only care about getting a new school in their neighborhood and don't care about anyone else. They don't care if other renovation projects now get deferred. They don't care if other areas with facilities needs continue to get ignored. They don't care if there is already excess capacity at some schools in western Fairfax. They don't want to hear any questions that the utlimate price tag could be well in excess of $150M. All they want is their new school and they want it NOW.
Wow! I live in the KAA area.
Where has it been said that we don't care about others?
Contrast Great Falls with the KAA area. Great Falls has been untouched by THRU. That is fine with me. I've said from the beginning and I still think this county-wide boundary study is ridiculous. If they want their thirty minute bus ride when there is a much closer school, that is fine with me.
As for the renovation projects--this school has been promised for years. And, a bond was passed. Other schools may have to wait a year, but this is a relatively inexpensive opportunity. We all know that. You know that and I know that.
Centreville will still get a renovation--but, maybe, it will be scaled back from the 3000 member school planned. Take this into consideration, this school will ultimately help Centreville and the Centreville neighbors who have to go on a long bus ride to Fairfax. (You might want to note the VERY expensive renovation there which is way more than what is being paid for KAA.)
Why do we want this school?
Our area has been split in pieces for years. One by one, they have kicked neighborhoods out of Chantilly and sent them to Oakton because of overcrowding at Chantilly (which we love). THRU plans to kick additional students out.
Some neighborhoods have gone through three high school changes in recent history. This means kids in two different high schools at the same time--not out of choice.
We have seen no hope for this to change with this School Board. And, now, we have a wonderful opportunity to solve this problem NOW--while waiting for years.
Oakton is a thirty minute bus ride over winding back roads or rush hour I66. Oakton is a good school, but most would rather be at Chantilly which is close by.
Other neighborhoods in the area are bused over to Westfield. This area is essentially an attendance island--a big one. If you look at a map, you won't notice it because all the area between our neighborhoods and Westfield is commercial and industrial. And, Dulles airport. Not conducive to a community feel.
Then, there are the neighborhoods pretty close to Westfield that are sent to Centreville because of the high membership at Westfield.
And, you think WE are the selfish ones?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
The GF people are smart enough to realize that merely objecting to the possibility of GF getting moved to Herndon isn't a winning strategy. So they've very sensibly framed their concerns in broader terms that appeal to people in other pyramids AND they've been more than willing to continue to do legwork on behalf of others even when the boundary consultant's recommendations didn't include moving anyone out of Langley. If they were your School Board representative or member of Congress you'd say they are very good at constituent service.
I would contrast that with the attitude of the those near KAA who, once they got wind of the KAA acquisition, have made it clear they only care about getting a new school in their neighborhood and don't care about anyone else. They don't care if other renovation projects now get deferred. They don't care if other areas with facilities needs continue to get ignored. They don't care if there is already excess capacity at some schools in western Fairfax. They don't want to hear any questions that the utlimate price tag could be well in excess of $150M. All they want is their new school and they want it NOW.
The GF people are smart enough to realize that merely objecting to the possibility of GF getting moved to Herndon isn't a winning strategy. So they've very sensibly framed their concerns in broader terms that appeal to people in other pyramids AND they've been more than willing to continue to do legwork on behalf of others even when the boundary consultant's recommendations didn't include moving anyone out of Langley. If they were your School Board representative or member of Congress you'd say they are very good at constituent service.
I would contrast that with the attitude of the those near KAA who, once they got wind of the KAA acquisition, have made it clear they only care about getting a new school in their neighborhood and don't care about anyone else. They don't care if other renovation projects now get deferred. They don't care if other areas with facilities needs continue to get ignored. They don't care if there is already excess capacity at some schools in western Fairfax. They don't want to hear any questions that the utlimate price tag could be well in excess of $150M. All they want is their new school and they want it NOW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
The GF people are smart enough to realize that merely objecting to the possibility of GF getting moved to Herndon isn't a winning strategy. So they've very sensibly framed their concerns in broader terms that appeal to people in other pyramids AND they've been more than willing to continue to do legwork on behalf of others even when the boundary consultant's recommendations didn't include moving anyone out of Langley. If they were your School Board representative or member of Congress you'd say they are very good at constituent service.
I would contrast that with the attitude of the those near KAA who, once they got wind of the KAA acquisition, have made it clear they only care about getting a new school in their neighborhood and don't care about anyone else. They don't care if other renovation projects now get deferred. They don't care if other areas with facilities needs continue to get ignored. They don't care if there is already excess capacity at some schools in western Fairfax. They don't want to hear any questions that the utlimate price tag could be well in excess of $150M. All they want is their new school and they want it NOW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the class rations atm or over student count for local hs? Since people keep saying ‘overcrowding’ just curious.
The nearby high schools have some of the highest populations of any in FCPS which is a huge negative for students (impossible to make sports teams, be school leaders in any way, etc). Westfield has 2800, Chantilly has over 3000, Oakton has 2700, Centreville has 2600, etc.
I believe someone said or they thought KAA could be a 2000 student HS school max, but that it had only 1200 students in K-12 enrolled when it closed. Not sure where the extra 800 came from but perhaps they were not using the whole space, or perhaps FCPS would redo some of the public spaces to make more classrooms. But yes that would make KAA HS the smallest in that area by far. But there are other ~2000 student HS’s in the county. South County is the next-newest building and is around 2000. Falls Church is around 2000 as well, Yorktown in Arlington and Langley both come in around 2200. As long as they could get it to 1900-2000 I don’t think people would complain. Below that and they might not be able to offer as many classes as other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
The main thrust of your post is that no one wants their kids moved.
I think we can all agree in that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
DP but I am fine with the purchase because $150 million for a ready built building is a lot less then the over $400 million and multiple years to build option. I like saving time and money. And I don't see it as rubber stamping when the Western HS has been discussed for 20 or so years and no progress has been made.
A pro for me is that there is a chance my kid might end up there. Another pro, even if my kid doesn't end up there, the other schools int eh area will see a drop in enrollment opening up good pupil placement options that don't exist right now.
And I don't buy for a second that the Great Falls group is up in arms with the procedure that was used. Great Falls likes to present themselves as the champion for everyone but the reality is that all they care about is not moving to Herndon. If they can spin it so it looks like they are against all movement, then great, but the level of protest sure seemed to drop once they sae that Great Falls wasn't moving. And now that there is the possibility of a new school that would reduce overcrowding in the area and they are all worried about procedure. My guess is that GF is in part worried about more space at Herndon and a desire to move kids to Herndon and in part worried that they will only get a renovation and not an expansion because there is now space at Herndon.
GF is for GF and only GF. And that is fine, pretty much everyone is looking out for what they see as their kids interests and less worried about what happens to other schools. The difference is that the other groups are honest about it.
I believe someone said or they thought KAA could be a 2000 student HS school max, but that it had only 1200 students in K-12 enrolled when it closed. Not sure where the extra 800 came from but perhaps they were not using the whole space, or perhaps FCPS would redo some of the public spaces to make more classrooms. But yes that would make KAA HS the smallest in that area by far. But there are other ~2000 student HS’s in the county. South County is the next-newest building and is around 2000. Falls Church is around 2000 as well, Yorktown in Arlington and Langley both come in around 2200. As long as they could get it to 1900-2000 I don’t think people would complain. Below that and they might not be able to offer as many classes as other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the class rations atm or over student count for local hs? Since people keep saying ‘overcrowding’ just curious.
The nearby high schools have some of the highest populations of any in FCPS which is a huge negative for students (impossible to make sports teams, be school leaders in any way, etc). Westfield has 2800, Chantilly has over 3000, Oakton has 2700, Centreville has 2600, etc.
I believe someone said or they thought KAA could be a 2000 student HS school max, but that it had only 1200 students in K-12 enrolled when it closed. Not sure where the extra 800 came from but perhaps they were not using the whole space, or perhaps FCPS would redo some of the public spaces to make more classrooms. But yes that would make KAA HS the smallest in that area by far. But there are other ~2000 student HS’s in the county. South County is the next-newest building and is around 2000. Falls Church is around 2000 as well, Yorktown in Arlington and Langley both come in around 2200. As long as they could get it to 1900-2000 I don’t think people would complain. Below that and they might not be able to offer as many classes as other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the class rations atm or over student count for local hs? Since people keep saying ‘overcrowding’ just curious.
The nearby high schools have some of the highest populations of any in FCPS which is a huge negative for students (impossible to make sports teams, be school leaders in any way, etc). Westfield has 2800, Chantilly has over 3000, Oakton has 2700, Centreville has 2600, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol. Not everything is a conspiracy. FCPS made a mistake when selling this land and corrected it. It's been on the books to have a high school there for 20 or 30 years. There is no conspiracy.
Citizens asking for good governance and stewardship of taxpayer money are not conspiracy theorists.
When some of those citizens live less than 3 miles from one school and 13 miles from the school they currently attend, it is hard to justify the "taxpayer money" issue.
Purchasing this school IS good stewardship of taxpayer money:
1. It reduces bus transportation costs. THRU is adding MORE students to 30 minute bus rides. Hundreds of students are already being sent on these bus rides. Thru will add many more.
2. It reduces schools that the School Board claims are overcrowded.
3. It eliminates a very huge attendance island.
4. It reduces constant boundary adjustments of the community.
5. It keeps neighborhoods together that THRU plans to split.
Oh, you’re the poster that would rubber stamp $150 million because you dislike great falls. Big surprise. 🙄
No, I am the poster who does not want my neighborhood split and sent on a thirty minute bus ride. Good stewardship is important. Passing up this opportunity to have a high school that has been promised for years is appropriate. I have always supported being able to stay put--including Great Falls--but when they are trying to sabotage something that is a very good thing, I have lost my sympathy.
This school could be populated with students that live easily within ten minutes--on a bad rush hour day. Instead of being split in many directions. That is a good thing.
Epitome of selfishness. Gotta get me that taxpayer handout, no questions can be asked, because my precious little snowflake can’t be on the bus too long, she’ll get a cramp.