Anonymous wrote:From MLSNEXT.
Is this some form of Pro/Rel?
STARTING IN SEPTEMBER 2025, CLUBS IN THE PROGRAM WILL COMPETE IN REGULAR SEASON GAMES, REGIONAL TOURNAMENTS, AND VARIOUS MLS NEXT NATIONAL EVENTS AS WELL AS COACHING DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS, TALENT IDENTIFICATION, AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE OPPORTUNITIES.
THIS EXPANSION WILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THOUSANDS OF ADDITIONAL PLAYERS AND COACHES, ALLOWING MEMBER CLUBS GREATER ABILITY TO ALIGN TEAM TRAVEL AND SCHEDULING, OPTIMIZE PLAYER POOLS, AND MORE EFFECTIVELY ALLOCATE CLUB RESOURCES.
THE EXPANDED TIER OF MLS NEXT WILL BE MANAGED BY LEADING LEAGUE OPERATORS ACROSS THE YOUTH LANDSCAPE WITH A STRONG COMMITMENT TO PLAYER DEVELOPMENT. THE OPERATORS WILL FOLLOW MANDATED PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET BY MLS NEXT TO ENSURE A HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCT.
OPERATORS WILL INCLUDE THE NATIONAL ACADEMY LEAGUE (NAL) OPERATED BY 3STEP SOCCER, ELITE ACADEMY LEAGUE (EAL), SPORTING DEVELOPMENT LEAGUE (SDL), COBALT SPORTS, AND CAL NORTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION.
IN THE EXPANDED TIER OF MLS NEXT, CLUBS WILL PARTICIPATE IN ONE OF EIGHT REGIONAL TOURNAMENTS EACH SEASON IN ADDITION TO THE OPTION FOR ELIGIBLE AGE GROUPS TO ATTEND MLS NEXT FEST IN DECEMBER. THE REGIONAL TOURNAMENTS WILL SERVE AS QUALIFYING FOR A CHAMPIONSHIP EVENT AT MLS NEXT CUP LATER IN 2026.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ALBION SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
CITY SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
SD SURF - SD, California - ECNL/ECNL
A little feedback from a Socal parent with a g2010 and g2016.
Last summer we were at a youngers (boys and girls) tournament in Oceanside. It was ridiculously obvious that clubs like CitySC (with MLSN) has 1st, 2nd 3rd, 4th, etc boys teams for almost every age group while clubs like SD Surf (ECNL) could only field one team per age group.
Extrapolate from there and it becomes pretty obvious why clubs are fighting to get involved with MLSN.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember, SD Surf has their puppet teams
SDSC Surf in GA AND ECNL too.
SDSC doesn't have top tier (MLSN) boys teams.
The girls side is GA and the boys are ECNL.
Just interesting that mls has allowed for a ECNL feeder team.
Is mls finally playing nice
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember, SD Surf has their puppet teams
SDSC Surf in GA AND ECNL too.
SDSC doesn't have top tier (MLSN) boys teams.
The girls side is GA and the boys are ECNL.
Anonymous wrote:Remember, SD Surf has their puppet teams
SDSC Surf in GA AND ECNL too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ALBION SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
CITY SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
SD SURF - SD, California - ECNL/ECNL
A little feedback from a Socal parent with a g2010 and g2016.
Last summer we were at a youngers (boys and girls) tournament in Oceanside. It was ridiculously obvious that clubs like CitySC (with MLSN) has 1st, 2nd 3rd, 4th, etc boys teams for almost every age group while clubs like SD Surf (ECNL) could only field one team per age group.
Extrapolate from there and it becomes pretty obvious why clubs are fighting to get involved with MLSN.
Anonymous wrote:ALBION SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
CITY SC - SD, California - MLSN/GA
SD SURF - SD, California - ECNL/ECNL
Anonymous wrote:Folks… if SD surf goes MLSN……….
