Anonymous wrote:Also some players who get tracked as “elite” continue to be considered elite thru high school when in fact other players easily outperform them. These tracked players are given the benefit of the doubt and are kept on high level teams despite mediocre performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My free advice: choose the best school that you can get into and the best academic fit. Then-- f lacrosse is part of the equation at that school-- great!.
Go to the best college possible. If your DD can get into, say UVA for example, but lacrosse is not an option-- and that's the best school she can get into and would be happy there-- then go to that school.
Best of luck to all the 2025s in finding the best school for them. At the end of the day, to me, the most important thing is-- the person should be happy and in a good place mentally.
This is good advice. A good number of commits will not continue playing all four years.
This is generally good advice. #1 being that the young woman is happy and healthy.
However, a driven to play in D1 young woman may not want the best academic schools that want her. So she choses perhaps a lower academic ranked school that offers her what she wants and needs to thrive academically and personally in order to play. This too is just as great.
One should not judge these these young women as they must make the decision for themselves based on their preferences, personal and family data points.
Agreed! Also, it’s important to recognize that not all majors benefit enough from a high academic to justify the extra cost (at least for undergrad). Lacrosse likely knocks a third off for a D1 recruit, but if the tuition is $85K per year, parents are still paying more than for a state school. And in state schools like Tech, UVA, and JMU have huge alumni networks in the D.C. area that can be an asset getting employed after college.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of a younger player and enjoy seeing such a great list of commitments from this area. Thank you all for sharing. Hoping not to derail the focus too much, I would love to hear any thoughts how the list of 2025 commitments would match up to expectations when these girls were in middle school. Was development through these years generally linear, where the "top" players in middle school remained so through high school (to this point)? Or was physical development such a wild card during these years that it significantly changed things? If I could take this great list of commitments back to your younger selves, would you be surprised, or would it be pretty much what you would have expected? Sincerely, this is not a troll post. Just curious.
Anonymous wrote:Cap O so far
Fairfield
Fairfield
Holy Cross
Colgate
Drexel
Holy Cross
American
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any more Cap B commits? I think 1 goalie and 1 attack are left.
I hear Cap O will have a few more after this weekend- Several waiting for NESCAC cycle
Any others @ Pride?
I'm shocked the remaining goalie hasn't committed. She's nationally ranked and an amazing goalie.
Agree. She goes to Potomac School though so must be super smart and driven. Betting she wants a top NESCAC.
It's okay for said player to visit schools and weigh all options. Relax....
Cap
25 Blue to UC Boulder
Is this true? Heard she was going to Cornell.
Goalie is going to Cornell
Anonymous wrote:Cap O so far
Fairfield
Fairfield
Holy Cross
Colgate
Drexel
Holy Cross
American
Anonymous wrote:From what I heard, she could have gone to many schools. Great student. Great player. Great young lady. This is a perfect fit.